All Activity

Pegula has ruined my hockey fandom. Haven’t watched much of the playoffs, and don’t really care about watching the finals. Thanks you f’ing buffoon.

Can we come up with some catchy slogan to put the A back in Byram?

The Colorado Rockies would like a word.

I'm not talking about Byrum. I'm talking about what a real offer would look like. Peterka, 9oa, and a prospect. Do you think that's too much for Robertson.

Sturm hired in Boston. The mantra seems to be they plan on being very defense first in terms of team identity. (They may have to be with their lack of offense outside of Pasternak).

No. Big no. At this time we do not have any of the leadership or experience required for the playoffs. They would be so far over their heads so fast they'd exit faster than the Leafs did when they first got back in. Look at Ottawa. They even had some playoff experience on the roster and they showed they were way out of their depths. You are dreaming if you think they will do well. Unless they add veteran leaders of course. But they have not shown any desire to do that so far.

Of course not. I said that if it was the deal, one for one, I would pounce on it. And what I also said is that if Byrum was thrown in the deal I would with no hesitation walk away.

As Napoleon once said "never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake"

You truly believe JJ Peterka for Jason Robertson straight up, is a reasonable trade offer?

I have no problem being laughed off. I would hang up and move on.

And Dallas would laugh you off the phone for your offer here, which is why I'm not going to refer to it 25 times because ik you know that not a full deal.

Focus. Peterka, 9oa, prospect

In a previous post you were willing to throw in Byrum into the deal. That would bring me to an absolute no because I would prefer using him in another deal.

What do you think a 100pt forward in their prime costs? Like for real? Peterka, 9oa, and a prospect is basically the price. It's always the price give or take a sweetener. Eichel: Tuch (Peterka), Krebs (prospect), 1st round pick (which was 16th oa), and a 3rd round pick.

True, 71-65-15 is over NHL .500. But his wins/loss record is 71-80, below in DeLuca .500.

A more proper evaluation is that the Sabres would have a better record if a more consistent goalie was in net.

My hairstylist asked me how would I like my hair cut. I told her to cut the gray off. I ended up leaving the establishment very bald. On the positive side I now where my Bills cap a lot.

You have a keen eye in recognizing that my position is grounded in my having more faith/expectations in our players than many here have. We shall see.

If the deal was straight up Peterka for Robertson, I would take the deal. In my opinion, some of your previous proposals were too generous for what we would give up .

Just had to sit back and wait. Evil never makes it to the finish line.

Well, if that's the price, you do it.

They all look like my daddy.

If Dallas is looking to move Robertson, they most likely will not want peterka in return. Their motive would be cap based, and peterka counters that. I could see 9, kulich and a B level prospect/2nd rounder getting it done

Mmmk. But he's over .500 for his career so expecting to lose more than win if he's in net for 30 games, is at least not supported by the numbers.

I don't consider a single one of those players, if involved in a trade, blockbuster.