thewookie1 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago They have been trying to sell the team for awhile now; owning 2 teams in the same league is a tad odd to say the least. 2 Quote
tom webster Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I’m not surprised by decision but giving a one week notice seems like a bit of a pressure move. Quote
Eleven Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago I'm sitting with Josh Byrne's sister-in-law right now. She's a little concerned about what this means for Josh's brother Taylor. Quote
Porous Five Hole Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/lacrosse/2025/06/23/rochester-knighthawks-looking-for-new-owners-after-pegula-divest/84319445007/ More info here, but soft paywall. This coincides with the Pegula’s giving up control of the arena, so it makes sense for them. I can confirm the Pegula’s made their intentions known with the NLL a long time before today. “I can confirm there are local entities that have interest in keeping the team in Rochester,” Guelli said. “That’s the goal…The league is basically taking over those conversations, with the goal of getting someone in place before next season starts. They’re pretty bullish that they can get somebody in here and take over.” Personally, I think this franchise is cooked, unfortunately. They may play in ROC for one more year, but the love for this team left when the Hawks relocated the first time. It was never the same after that. Quote
Taro T Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Brawndo said: Interesting. TIL. Honestly thought the Pegulas had sold that team about 1-1/2 years ago. Didn't realize they still owned and ran them. Guess they just put them up for sale 1-1/2 years ago. Oops. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, Taro T said: Interesting. TIL. Honestly thought the Pegulas had sold that team about 1-1/2 years ago. Didn't realize they still owned and ran them. Guess they just put them up for sale 1-1/2 years ago. Oops. I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. Quote
pastajoe Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 24 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. The attendance of their biggest attraction, the Amerks, averages around 6,000. So there is no justification for that large of a venue. Quote
Timonthy 76 Posted 35 minutes ago Report Posted 35 minutes ago 1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said: I can't believe they couldn't sell an NLL franchise. They are in demand. Was there a clause to keep them in Rochester? Maybe that's the rub. Blue Cross Arena is not exactly state of the art. A city the size of Rochester ought to have a 16-18K seat venue. NLL is a money loser, look for the owner of the Rock to sell in the next 4 months, he’s had enough of losing money. With Toronto, Philadelphia and others I can see NLL folding in 5 years Quote
Taro T Posted 10 minutes ago Report Posted 10 minutes ago 58 minutes ago, pastajoe said: The attendance of their biggest attraction, the Amerks, averages around 6,000. So there is no justification for that large of a venue. Thanks, Jabba. Thank you for bringing in the Swamp Cats as the parent to the Amerks when they were what the Sabres are now. Thank you for killing a very vibrant hockey market. Too bad for you, you only essentially killed pro hockey in the area. Youth hockey is thriving and one of the local rinks is even adding a new sheet this summer. Go fork yourself, Donner the Hutt. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.