woods-racer Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 I think the brilliance of acquiring Kane and ROR is that those are the big names, along with Eichel, who will attract attention, which will hopefully lead to a little more room for people like Ennis and Reindhart. Reindhart? From you of all people. P.P.A.A. (Pedantic Peoples Association of America) will be calling for their card back mister! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Reindhart? From you of all people. P.P.A.A. (Pedantic Peoples Association of America) will be calling for their card back mister! At least that's a creative place to put the D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woods-racer Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 (edited) At least that's a creative place to put the D. He does have this thing about naming himself after goalies, so putting the D where he wants them must come naturally? Edited October 28, 2015 by Woods-Racer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 :flirt: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 He does have this thing about naming himself after goalies, so putting the D where he wants them must come naturally?This is... not where I thought this thread was going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Sorry. I thought we could mention other players in this thread. There's probably a Redinhart thread around where I can post comments about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woods-racer Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Sorry. I thought we could mention other players in this thread. There's probably a Redinhart thread around where I can post comments about him. I think your looking for the [please change title] thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Sorry. I thought we could mention other players in this thread. There's probably a Redinhart thread around where I can post comments about him.Ahahaha I meant that's not the joke I was expecting when I mentioned "the D." Woodsie's head is above the water level of the gutter, it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woods-racer Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Ahahaha I meant that's not the joke I was expecting when I mentioned "the D." Woodsie's head is above the water level of the gutter, it seems. AAAHH! That D. I should remember your use of capitalizing letters is more strategic in nature, than for looks. Next time..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7+6=13 Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Just type the stuff into the subject, it's not that hard. Better than than 20 new posts with 20 words total in the subjects. It's not difficult for sure and I agree that short titles are not descriptive enough to determine whether you want to click on it or not - but I'd take 20 new posts over one post with 75 pages. Like I said in earlier posts it makes it somewhat difficult for new members to jump in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 It's not difficult for sure and I agree that short titles are not descriptive enough to determine whether you want to click on it or not - but I'd take 20 new posts over one post with 75 pages. Like I said in earlier posts it makes it somewhat difficult for new members to jump in.Right, nobody is arguing against new threads. You could make the argument that it's easier for new posters to jump in if the threads are named better, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 So... did we see the goal of the year and the save of the year in one night, from one team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 So... did we see the goal of the year and the save of the year in one night, from one team?I think Jack Eichel's second goal is comparable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJFIVEOH Posted October 28, 2015 Report Share Posted October 28, 2015 Just type the stuff into the subject, it's not that hard. Better than than 20 new posts with 20 words total in the subjects. Yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7+6=13 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 Right, nobody is arguing against new threads. You could make the argument that it's easier for new posters to jump in if the threads are named better, too. Have I argued against the need to have threads named better? Not sure you followed my point - but I get it you really really don't like threads that aren't named better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 Have I argued against the need to have threads named better? Not sure you followed my point - but I get it you really really don't like threads that aren't named better. ...okay... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvelo Posted October 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 I haven't been aware of the big controversy surrounding naming the freeking post. I don't think it's a big deal but that's me. I would've liked to see more comments on Tyler Ennis here but I guess having controversy, however manufactured, is the main thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 So how has Tyler Ennis or mighty mouse, managed to stay consistent on a team that has wallowed in suckitude for so long? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 (edited) So... did we see the goal of the year and the save of the year in one night, from one team? That's not even a goal of the year candidate. Probably top 10 on this weeks "Top Shelf" show on NHL network. Its more lucky than good... I mean he just hacked at it and the goal didn't have the far side angled off enough. It's not like he went bar down, he just threw it at the net from the goal line. GOod idea, sometimes pucks just find their way in. That save tho. Anderson had a sparkling save in OT last night against CGY. 3-on-3 OT is going to produce some spectacular plays, it's good for the game. How long before they just go 3-on-3 the entire time? Or drop one additional player each period as the game advances until it's just 1-on-1. Eichel vs McDavid all alone on the ice? I'd watch. Edited October 29, 2015 by pi2000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skaught Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 How long before they just go 3-on-3 the entire time? Or drop one additional player each period as the game advances until it's just 1-on-1. Eichel vs McDavid all alone on the ice? I'd watch. They need to get rid of the shootout and go 3v3, 2v2, 1v1 for OT, just remove a player every 4 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 So how has Tyler Ennis or mighty mouse, managed to stay consistent on a team that has wallowed in suckitude for so long? I think he put his mind to improving his own game the last two seasons. No performance expectations? Fine. Then he did what *he* wanted to do to improve his game. Now we're seeing the payoff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi2000 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 They need to get rid of the shootout and go 3v3, 2v2, 1v1 for OT, just remove a player every 4 minutes. i like it. after 1v1 they should start adding pucks to the ice 1v1 with 2 pucks, 3 pucks, 4 pucks.. until somebody buries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwksndmonster Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 i like it. after 1v1 they should start adding pucks to the ice 1v1 with 2 pucks, 3 pucks, 4 pucks.. until somebody buries.That is the most insane idea I've ever heard. They should do a multipuck game in the all star skills competition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 (edited) That is the most insane idea I've ever heard. They should do a multipuck game in the all star skills competition. I would watch that. You'd have to have multicamera views though... one for each puck. At the whistle each team skates pucks out of their zone, one puck from each of the defensive faceoff dots. Edited October 29, 2015 by The Big Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohickie Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 So what's up with Ennis? I was doing some things during the game last night so I couldn't follow the game as closely as I wanted to or get to read the GDT. Apparently he missed the game with a LBI? Was it just a one-day thing or will he be out for a while? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.