Campy Posted July 18, 2014 Report Share Posted July 18, 2014 That is an interesting look at the Sabres contract situation to be sure. Moulson and Gionta are the most interesting aspects of this, with the date on Gionta's NMC shifting over to a limited NTC, I have to wonder if Murray wouldn't be looking to move them after the 2/3 season mark as well. Time limit on instilling character and leadership qualities on the kids? The bolded part got me thinking that, as as a whole, this group seems like a more mature group than the previous core that moved up from Rochester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted July 18, 2014 Report Share Posted July 18, 2014 The bolded part got me thinking that, as as a whole, this group seems like a more mature group than the previous core that moved up from Rochester. Boy, let's hope so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudacek Posted July 18, 2014 Report Share Posted July 18, 2014 That is an interesting look at the Sabres contract situation to be sure. Moulson and Gionta are the most interesting aspects of this, with the date on Gionta's NMC shifting over to a limited NTC, I have to wonder if Murray wouldn't be looking to move them after the 2/3 season mark as well. Time limit on instilling character and leadership qualities on the kids? Maybe both sides are open to shipping Gionta to a cup contender for one last run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted July 19, 2014 Report Share Posted July 19, 2014 Hmmmm... http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bemuse I see M-W has an alternate definition that accedes to the word's modern misusage. I wonder if its definition of 'crescendo' does the same. I come from the prescriptive camp of dictionary formation not the descriptive. Oh snap - it DOES do the same with crescendo. http://i.word.com/idictionary/crescendo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted July 19, 2014 Report Share Posted July 19, 2014 I see M-W has an alternate definition that accedes to the word's modern misusage. I wonder if its definition of 'crescendo' does the same. I come from the prescriptive camp of dictionary formation not the descriptive. Oh snap - it DOES do the same with crescendo. http://i.word.com/idictionary/crescendo OED or nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted July 19, 2014 Report Share Posted July 19, 2014 OED or nothing. Thought that might be: OED or GTFO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastPommerFan Posted July 19, 2014 Report Share Posted July 19, 2014 M-W has literally conceded the definition of every word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted July 20, 2014 Report Share Posted July 20, 2014 M-W has literally conceded the definition of every word. I see what you did there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.