carpandean

Yeah, that would be terrible .... we might only make it to the SC finals ...

Thanks for quoting my post, which has since disappeared. Good job connecting it to the discussion at hand. I should clarify that Jon Favreau has the original trilogy ingrained in his spirit (soul), not the bottom of his foot (sole). 😣

Agree to disagree. There were so many things that weren't good - and I'm not even one who minded Luke's fall from glory. Plus, it felt very disconnected from TFA, so when was it really that they didn't commit. To me, it felt like twice. I didn't mean to imply that you just get fans together for the project. The team needed someone who was qualified technically, but also had a passion for the lore that came before. Jon Favreau is the obvious example of someone who is in the industry, but also clearly grew up with the original series ingrained on his sole. And not everyone would need to be a fan. You'd still want outside voices, too, or the franchise can't grow. Anyway, we should best leave the SW talk for another thread.

I agree with much of your point, but The Last Jedi was terrible. Their mistake was not having someone or even a team that included real fans of the franchise*, plan the path of the trilogy in advance. It was relatively directionless at the start, and then Johnson and Abrams (again) were seemingly allowed to completely change the direction from the prior episode as they saw fit. It was like two people, who aren't from the area, grabbing for the wheel while driving in the fog without a map (or navi), and then being surprised when both the trip and destination weren't good. * While The Mandalorian had its flaws, watching the behind the scenes process was inspiring, and the results were certainly better than the third trilogy.

I almost posted that same thing yesterday. 👍

15 years later, I can still watch this with the sound off and hear every word Rick and Jim said.

Done without thinking very much. 🤪

You've wandered North of the border?

My ideal scenario is that the Sabres beat Pittsburgh twice in regulation, and then Anaheim pushes one game to OT. 😁

No, but still notably more likely not to happen than to happen. We play Pittsburgh twice and they play Minnesota twice. They have similar records (including last 10), and both have clinched playoff spots. Pittsburgh is playing for the top spot in the East Division, while the Wild are only playing for third in their division. Anaheim is likely to lose both, but getting a point or even one win wouldn't be that surprising. However, even with the Sabres playing like they are, winning both against Pittsburgh is a big task. If they do manage to do that on the back of Houser winning four straight, though, I'll be OK with it.

Unfortunately, this won't even be true if we do finish behind Anaheim. The first two picks are up for grabs (lottery) this year. Right now, we're guaranteed one of the two highest odds of getting the first pick, but currently can pick as low as 4th overall. If (still a big if) we finish behind Anaheim, we can still pick as low as 3rd overall.

It's hard not to look good when you're on the 2nd line behind one of the top 1st lines in the league and this guy is on the line with you:

From the "Not a tank" thread:

No matter what, the Ducks have to lose both in regulation for the Sabres to possibly pass them. Likewise, the Sabres need to win both, but not necessarily both in regulation, to pass them: If at least one of the Sabres' two wins is in regulation, they pass the Duck based on RW tiebreaker. If both Sabres wins are in OT/SO, they would be tied in points and RW, but would trail the Ducks in the ROW tiebreaker (at most 13 vs. the Duck's 15.) In summary, for the Sabres to not finish last, the Ducks have to lose both in regulation and the Sabres must win both with at least one coming in regulation.

So, we can't catch NJ anymore, since we can at best tie in points and RW, but we can't get to 17 ROW. For Vancouver, we'd have to win out in regulation ... and they'd have to lose 11 straight in regulation. 😲 Just Anaheim is left. They have us in ROW (16 vs. 14 max), so we'd either have to beat them in points (need at least 7 out of 8 ) or tie (6-8 points, depending on what they do in their last 4) w/ more RW (they start with a lead of 1.)

Jack is definitely more talented, but as the old saying goes, "Hard work beats talent when ..." (you know the rest)

Yeah, with as bad as things were in the first half of the season, I want them getting as many good vibes as possible in the second. They'll lose, too, but they'll be better losses. In the end, they dug enough of a hole that they've got some room to win before they threaten their draft position too much.

He was already working on his "who has two thumbs and two wins?" joke for the locker room.

Did I really not see ... Top Gun Hunt for Red October Crimson Tide 5th Element 🤪

Notably, the first player in Sabres history to do so.

The O'Reilly trade was more embarrassing despite actually getting a #1 in that deal.

For what they're worth, there were rumors for the past couple of weeks that several teams were in discussion with Buffalo, but that nobody wanted to give up the first that Adams was insisting on. So, if those were true, he was working on deals for weeks, but didn't have anything better than what he ended up getting to present to Taylor.

Either that or he scores a hat trick tonight (Steve Bernier effect), SabreSpace explodes, and then he goes back to being mediocre in Boston for the rest of season. Despite that, he is used for years as an example of Sabres players going on to be much better elsewhere.

Asplund leads the team in goals per game (excluding R2, since he's played so few.) So, that's something. 🤪