GASabresIUFAN Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Right now we have 4 players on IR - Greenway, Power, Kesselring and UPL Who goes when they come back? Our extra players are 2 goalies (Ellis and Georgiev), 2 forwards (Geeraten & Kozak) and arguably 1 D if we keep only 7 D in Buffalo (Bryson or Johnson) If I were making the decisions: Greenway in for Kozak Kesselring in for Georgiev Power in for Bryson UPL in for Ellis Quote
Brawndo Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Power is skating in a non contact jersey and Alexandar Georgiev is not on the ice. On waivers perhaps? Quote
Porous Five Hole Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Power is skating in a non contact jersey and Alexandar Georgiev is not on the ice. On waivers perhaps? Apartment hunting in Rochester Quote
dudacek Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Power is skating in a non contact jersey and Alexandar Georgiev is not on the ice. On waivers perhaps? It's almost like the couldn't get him to sign a PTO, so they paid him a year's salary to essentially be on one. Quote
Pimlach Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, LGR4GM said: I think that's a problem. If you aren't willing to defend yourself or you teammates because Gertie is sitting on the bench, your team is going to be weaker not stronger. Not saying that's what will happen but toughness is a team effort. True, but I got tired of seeing those 3 having to drop them and no one else (accept maybe Clifton) and certainly no follow up (see Noeson and Thompson). Ruff wants to carry a tough guy, yet he didn't put Gilbert on the ice after Thompson got nailed, he wanted to score a goal. That was fine, but Gilbert bever even got a shift after that. Why carry Gertie if that is how he is going to use him? 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, LGR4GM said: What's funny is this team could have Bernard-Docker or Grezlyc for basically the same money but went with Jones and Bryson. Just amazing how much they mismanaged the easy parts. It sure seems that Adams loves to work on, 5/6/7/8 defenders, fourth line forwards, and backup goalies. Could that be why they don't get better? 1 1 Quote
ponokasabre Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Power is skating in a non contact jersey and Alexandar Georgiev is not on the ice. On waivers perhaps? Great to hear about Power, he should be "fingers crossed" ready for Thursday Quote
French Collection Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Pimlach said: True, but I got tired of seeing those 3 having to drop them and no one else (accept maybe Clifton) and certainly no follow up (see Noeson and Thompson). You forgot the willing lightweight Krebs. Quote
dudacek Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Pimlach said: It sure seems that Adams loves to work on, 5/6/7/8 defenders, fourth line forwards, and backup goalies. Could that be why they don't get better? I'm not prepared to dig in again, but the number of 6-9 defencemen that have come through here over Adams' tenure is off the charts long. Edited 1 hour ago by dudacek 1 Quote
shrader Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 45 minutes ago, dudacek said: It's almost like the couldn't get him to sign a PTO, so they paid him a year's salary to essentially be on one. So if they mutually agree to part ways and then the contract doesn’t get paid, it winds up essentially as a PTO. I don’t know, I get NHL or nothing vibes from this one and now that they’re not interested, he’ll leave. Quote
Pimlach Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Just now, French Collection said: You forgot the willing lightweight Krebs. He scraps, he defends himself, he agitates, but his is not going to deter someone from taking liberties. Same with Benson and a few others. The team needs a fighter that can play a regular shift. 1 1 Quote
shrader Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 40 minutes ago, Pimlach said: True, but I got tired of seeing those 3 having to drop them and no one else (accept maybe Clifton) and certainly no follow up (see Noeson and Thompson). Ruff wants to carry a tough guy, yet he didn't put Gilbert on the ice after Thompson got nailed, he wanted to score a goal. That was fine, but Gilbert bever even got a shift after that. Why carry Gertie if that is how he is going to use him? It’s easier to write off one of 12 forward slots than it is 1 of 6 on D. Were they down any D back when all of that happened? Im not crazy about carrying the guy, but I could see him shuttling back and forth a lot. Is he Rempe insurance for game 1 and then he’s down already? Quote
Thorny Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 39 minutes ago, dudacek said: I'm not prepared to dig in again, but the number of 6-9 defencemen that have come through here over Adams' tenure is off the charts long. 1 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted 33 minutes ago Report Posted 33 minutes ago 1 hour ago, dudacek said: I'm not prepared to dig in again, but the number of 6-9 defencemen that have come through here over Adams' tenure is off the charts long. The amount of churn is ridiculous -- even at a group of positions where you would expect churn. But what is the most damning of it is how many of them were brought in and immediately inserted higher in the lineup than that, plus Bryson has been here the entire time holding one of those slots and cannot be improved upon. (And again, that's not to disparage Bryson who is a valid 8-9 tweener guy, depending on the rest of the roster construction.) And he started with a D-corps that had Montour and McCabe (and Ristolainen, though the trade return was excellent). And he got Matt Irwin! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.