-
Posts
2,687 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Porous Five Hole
-
Are we going to play this "in the hunt" game again?
Porous Five Hole replied to PASabreFan's topic in The Aud Club
Moneypuck is predicting 84 points for the last wildcard spot in the East. Imagine that? All it takes is 85 pts and the Sabres still couldn’t break the drought. -
Are we going to play this "in the hunt" game again?
Porous Five Hole replied to PASabreFan's topic in The Aud Club
Sure do. 2.6% to make the playoffs, and 8.1% to win the lottery. https://moneypuck.com/predictions.htm -
He seems quite vocal, but maybe not so much between whistles?
-
I made it two minutes and bailed 🤮
-
Sunday 1pm playoff game!!!
-
Ever since the Rona, I cannot stand cilantro. Strangely, I didn’t lose my sense of taste when I got sick in 2021. I used to love cilantro.
-
What would you trade for Elias Petterson?
Porous Five Hole replied to freester's topic in The Aud Club
I want to be good asap. Gimme Petts with Byram and Cozens versus the concept of Misa & Petts in 2027-28. -
What would you trade for Elias Petterson?
Porous Five Hole replied to freester's topic in The Aud Club
IF Vancouver would bite on the concept, I would do it. Why hold the 2025 pick and hope you get an elite guy in 2-3 years time…when that pick can be used to acquire Pettersson, a guy you *hope* said 2025 pick would turn into one day…and you get the player right now. See if you can grab some advanced stat graphs from Petts 22-23 and 23-24 seasons. The guy is elite. It’s a unique situation. Vancouver would have to decide 1) Miller & Pettersson will be problematic for the locker room forever, 2) Miller’s no trade protection gets them pennies on the dollar for JT in a trade, and 3) the Canuck’s need to move Petts before his NMC kicks in for max value. The Sabres are one of a few teams who can absorb Petts AAV and they will have ammo to make a deal. -
Good call on if we had to choose. If we had to, I agree with you & would also ride or die with Byram. It doesn’t hurt that Power would probably bring more back in a trade…the league averages about nine defensemen who can eclipse 60 points annually, and he projects to be one of them. Plus we already have one of those guys in Dahlin.
-
Power isn’t a pylon. He moves well for a big guy. He is not good defensively today, but he’s also 22 and on a bad team. Struggling defensively as his age isn’t uncommon even for his draft position. And let’s not forget his GM has done him no favors in the form of a veteran partner worth a damn. He has all the tools to be elite offensively. He can improve in front of the net. Actually I expect it. I am as frustrated as everyone else at this craptacular season, but I’m not moving Power (or Byram).
-
It slightly depends on Byram’s long term AAV, but I think they can afford both. And I don’t think you NEED to move on from one because of handedness. The team improvement you’re referencing is having three elite players on the blue line in their prime. To expect it from a 22 year old Power and 23 year old Byram today is misguided. I do not expect GMKA to fold his hand and trade out either of these pieces. And I wouldn’t either. Plenty of other deck chairs to throw overboard for a shakeup. I would be much more concerned about Dylan Cozens being a $7MM earner & a 45 pt player.
-
What would you trade for Elias Petterson?
Porous Five Hole replied to freester's topic in The Aud Club
I know conventional wisdom is to not trade the pick. But I’m getting the top five pick back fully formed. That’s my angle. No more development. A top 5 pick, our boy Quinn, Krebs or Muel, a first round prospect, and millions in cap flexibility. I don’t think it is an automatic no. I will concede Vancouver only does this if they absolutely have to split up Miller & Pettersson. I’m working under that premise.