Jump to content

PickaPecaPickles

Members
  • Posts

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PickaPecaPickles

  1. Since this thread is about offense, that was the focus. You seem to believe that bringing in some veterans is NOT without the possibility they will under-perform. Adding players like ROR, Kane or Hall didn't put the Sabres over the playoff hump, so there's no guarantee your plan will work either. Personally, I like what they're doing, building chemistry with the young talent they have, and I think this group is more than capable of scoring at a playoff level clip. That said, it's clear the #1 issue for next year is to address goal tending.
  2. Yes, that was what my attempt was about, to see how realistic it is for them to hit your goal total, and I also think it's very doable. As for the top line, I think Tage has even more room to grow. He and Skinner are at 68 now, and I think they will hit at least 70 next year too. Looking forward to it.
  3. Seems reasonably doable with the projected group? Skinner Tnt Tuch = 95-100 VO Mitts Quinn = 60-70 Z Asplund KO = 40 Krebs Cozens JJP = 45 D = 20-25 Total = 260-280 or 3.17 - 3.41 ppg
  4. In sports, it should be known as "hyper" or "fanatical" recency bias.
  5. Certainly, it's a combination of things, but I think coaching tops the list. Every so often, I catch Granato's Tuesday morning sessions on WGR and he has mentioned several times how they work individually with each player on different aspects of their games. My interpretation of several related comments was that he expected their individual work to eventually translate to better overall team play--call it synergy or the "whole being greater than the sum of its parts" strategy. Most of the comments I'm referring to I heard months ago, so it appears the coaching is paying off.
  6. You misinterpreted that. 11 said "when it gets a good goalie." I simply added that he (the good goalie they get) needs to stay healthy too, given how many injuries Sabres goalies have experienced the past couple years.
  7. Opposite problem for me. I recently dropped (money sucking) spectrum TV and went to Hulu LIve with ESPN+ package because I thought most of the games would be shown there, only to find they're blacked out locally. First game I'll get to see in a few weeks.
  8. An absolute "NO!" in response. The odds of him missing the Olympics due to injury are 100% as a Sabres goalie.
  9. In case anyone is interested, Amerks down 4-2 after 2; JJ with 2 assists.
  10. Let's see if he goes back to Cozens on that line, given how well they played the other night?
  11. One impression to note, it seems to me that Asplund hasn't had a good game in over a month...?
  12. This is probably a good take. I think Cozens is like a lot of talented R1 picks who are used to winning. It's not naivete, it's what we should expect from young guns. I think the necessary ingredient is a winning culture that pervades the organization. It's not unlike what the Bills went through. How many coaches and GMs over the 17-year drought? All brought "hopium" when they arrived, but only one was able to drain the swamp in the organization and start over. McDermott and Beane also got rid of Non-process guys. I don't think Eichel, Rhino and Risto are non-process, but the organization needed to start fresh, and also keep a few holdover vets to help the young'uns along (Kyle O = Kyle W?). It seems to me that Adams has tried to clean house and create a similar culture change, but I'm not familiar enough with the org itself, at least compared to the Bills. The source of toxicity of the Bills org was mostly Russ Brandon and somewhat Whaley. I don't think there was an equivalent in the Sabres org that made it dysfunctional--was there? It does appear that Adams has started anew by hiring his own people (like Karmanos). So, in my limited view of the org, Cozens is like Tre White coming in and saying something similar, but it only matters if there is the culture to support it, as was established by McDermott and Beane. Is KA getting done?
  13. Maybe it's his size, or the way he skates, or both, but it looks like he plays in 3rd gear, and has another one (or two) he can ratchet up to.
  14. Yes, good entertainment on the ice. Observations: TT is getting so many good chances, his luck will change and he'll get on a nice scoring run. At one point, I reflected on Donnie G's comments from the other night, that Dhalin will get to a point where the good things he does will outweigh the bad (or something like that). There was a "WTF is he doing?" moment when he put a pass between his legs from behind his own net and only UPL prevented a score. Despite that, it seemed he had another really strong game. I admit, I thought MInny would win in OT, especially when it got to a shootout. Good for UPL getting the W. I'm wondering if between the Sabres and Amerks, there's only one stopper to plug two holes? I hope those young'uns don't lose confidence.
  15. I recall Butcher had a couple of giveaways too. Substitute Power and Samuelson for Hagg and Butcher, and their ability to compete takes a big jump. Another person who I thought played a good game was Hinostroza. Early in the season, I was not impressed at all, but it could've been because I kept mixing him up with Caggiula.
  16. Related to this discussion, there's a Good piece in TheAthletic about Granato's plan, which is to focus on the offensive development of the players.
  17. Ahhh, history. I seem to recall reading not too long ago the Sabres hadn't won a game against the Lightning since November 13, 2018.
  18. My sentiments exactly. I don't expect much from the goal tending and overall D (though they looked much better for about 1.5 periods last game). I know it's not kosher, but I'm hoping for a top 5 pick. If they can average about 3 gpg along the way, I'll be entertained; especially if the 4 you mention get 20+ each (well, at least the pace would be 20+ for Mitts).
×
×
  • Create New...