-
Posts
20,476 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
The Hockey Battlefield
Recent Profile Visitors
19,360 profile views
Pimlach's Achievements

Hall of Famer (8/8)
15.9k
Reputation
-
I am opposed to either of these trades.
-
Series tied 2-2. I love it. Great to see the Oiler's battle back. May the best team win.
-
Chad D: expect a Byram trade at or around the draft
Pimlach replied to dudacek's topic in The Aud Club
Who won the Mitts-Byram trade is strange hill to die on. The Sabres as a team did not improve in the standings, they regressed. Colorado had another post season that disappointed them, but that Sabres fans would absolutely love to experience. It looks to me like Byram is the better player of the two. That’s my opinion based on comparing two players on different teams that play different positions. As @LGR4GM stated, it appears Byram has more value today than Mitts had (he was traded for 3rd line player Charlie Coyle), supporting the notion that Byram is the better player. Did the trade improve the Sabres? That answer unfortunately is NO. The Sabres finished lower in the standings with 5 fewer points, but certainly there were other factors at play as well. Where Byram would fit was always a question. Did we hurt our center spline by removing Mitts was also a question. Mitts clearly did not cut it as a 2C in Colorado, and while Byram was effective when playing with Dahlin (as all other Sabres defensemen were) he did not much bring otherwise. He (and others) did not step up when Dahlin was hurt which is when it was needed most. A big team need is still there - a solid and steady defense first player at RHD to compliment Power or Dahlin. Adams, always late to the party, said himself that he wasn’t sure how to use Byram. A big consideration, since Mitts is a center, is to evaluate the play of the Sabres centers. Lindy most definitely considered the center spline to be a weak spot on the team. There was much line shuffling because of the center play. Cozens folded under the weight of the “A” and the 2C role and was moved out. Even after bringing in McLeod in a separate deal, who was good, the center spline was an area of concern and it still is. Getting the better player is nice. Now they have to somehow leverage that to improve the roster. At some point this was to about improving the team, and not “winning trades”. -
Goal in the last minute. Oilers not working enough.
-
Reinhart wanted out when he saw another rebuild coming and the Eichel injury situation unfolding. He did the one year extension prior to that year, and then wanted out. Some people may have said culture changes were needed when the narrative was Eichel was a bad boy, so Reinhart by association must be one too. Of course both players have matured and disproved all of that.
-
Vegas had a great start thanks to the excellent work of their management team. Vegas is a favored destination for players and is not a good comparison for Buffalo. My point is we had many excellent draft picks, but look at the results. You have to do more than draft a bunch of top ten players.
-
I know your company and industry as you and I have talked on PMs. As far as his resume, the hiring manager usually gets that from the job posting portal. I have seen this situation a lot and have hired sons/daughters of several employees myself. It can and does work in a very big company with no problems. Since you are in physically close proximity, it is more up to you not getting involved in his workday than anything else. If he gets hired chances are he moves to a new project in the first few years and you never see him at work.
-
Marketing fluff but what I see: Adams does lots of catering to Terry. Ok, he is involved and he is the owner. Adams is a consensus builder, but how do they handle objecting opinions we don't see that here. Ruff wants players that change the culture. Appert likes Norris. Lindy comfortable that he is a 1C/2C. The rest if the guys playing with laptops, pretending they get a vote. Terry was 100% comfortable, that is so nice. Adams congratulates himself for making "nearly impossible" hockey trades.
-
Old does not mean impatient. In the case of the Sabres, old fans equate to resilient and steadfast. Since the Tank we have drafted these players in the "top 10 overall": Reinhart (2), Eichel (2), Nylander (8), Mitts (8), Dahlin (1), Cozens (7), Quinn (8), Power (1), Savioe (9). How is the "draft in the top ten" strategy working and when is the "help us win right now" part ever going to happen?
-
Chad D: expect a Byram trade at or around the draft
Pimlach replied to dudacek's topic in The Aud Club
All this gloom and doom that we won't get a good return for Byram. If there are really several teams interested in Byram then a savvy GM can play that to his advantage. Lets not forget we have Jarmo now, maybe he can help make something good happen for a change. -
Some of you think that it is players agents rumblings, but in the case of Peterka, he must really want to leave to have his agent rumbling for him. The Peterka rumors go back to the last trade deadline and there is the Dahlin story out there, indicates some unrest with Peterka. I agree with taking a hard line with him if that is the best choice for the team and fair compensation cannot be obtained in trade The Sabres do not have to accommodate a trade. Caving to RFAs sets a dangerous precedent in the future and this team is already known to quickly move people out when they are unhappy.