PerreaultForever

My high school had it first.

I'm not paying Rosen a bag of nickels.

You'll have to explain how this statement affects things. Adams brought in this 5 years down the road thinking more than anyone and he should have been fired but he wasn't so we are where we are. We can't not behave like a proper organization because of it though. Tuch is valuable, but he's not THAT valuable.

I think that's pretty extreme. The cap is going up but so will ALL the salaries. 10 million is still a lot for him. Peterka signed with Utah for 7.7 . He's younger, he had 68 pts. Tuch had 67. Now you can argue that Tuch brings leadership and other factors but to get from 8 to 10 is a lot. If it's 8 years that makes him 37 at the end of it. Since they are still negotiating I'm assuming there is no hometown discount in play. The right number for Tuch is 8x8. That overpays him in the last 3-4 years but it's fair since he's valuable now. The because it's the Sabres overpay number is 9x8. So this is the number where you say win for the Sabres win for Tuch. 10x8 or anything higher will help close the Sabres window before it's barely open a crack. Bad idea.

I understand the sentiment, and I also understand why nobody would want another rebuild, but you can't get anywhere building something unsustainable either can you? If you end up with a bunch of big contracts and you are still not winning what do you do? The only logical thing is get rid of those contracts and try again. They've done it so many times and for so long that the idea does not inspire the type of hope it does in other rebuild franchises but what else can you do? If your "core" can't get you into the playoffs your "core" isn't what you need.

I don't ever remember Kassian being referred to as hard to play against. Dropping the gloves doesn't equate to that. Samuelsson was simply over hyped because of size and name recognition. Will Borgen is actually better than him, and Will is mediocre. The failure to assess their talent properly is a Sabres thing.

Oh no, that's why I said the re-rebuild. You trade him you have to tear it ALL down and you have to start with a new GM and a new ethos. It's a bind like I said, but we will never get anywhere if we overspend on a mediocre team. It'll crash when Benson etc. want to be paid.

10 with term is a BAD idea.

If I'm Tuch's agent I hold to a ridiculous ask and see how the season plays out. Tuch can keep saying "I love Buffalo" "I want to be in Buffalo" and "I'm not thinking about it. My agent will work all that out." If the season tanks he can walk into that big free agency class, save face, and have all his options available. If I'm the Sabres, I wait to see how the season goes and if I can't get a reasonable deal done I just play out the season. If it is not looking like playoffs I move him for a haul at the deadline and begin the new new re-rebuild. If the Sabres give him a huge overpay they are screwed no matter what happens. They are in a tough spot and a full rebuild might be the only way (potentially) out of it. Nobody wants to hear that but if your only option is to continually overpay or look like a league farm team constantly having players walk you'll never get anywhere.

Nope. Makes no sense. Two completely different players with different histories.

Nah, it's simply not possible for the Leafs to beat any team with Marchand on it 🙂 McDavid, however, might get his cup.

and here I thought you were going to say you'd installed a toilet in your living room.

Huh? How is this in any way accurate?

The league is pushing kids into the line ups sooner than they used to, that is true. I'd argue against Dahlin being pretty good right off the bat but it's not worth getting into. The point overall is they learn bad habits and lack the physical size and muscle to learn to play the right way. Risto is actually the perfect example. A guy who got messed up and didn't know who or what he was. Cozens can still be fixed but he has to unlearn and relearn. He might, he might not. My basic argument would be if your line doesn't have a veteran on it (preferably two) it's a bad idea and Cozens-Quinn-Peterka was a bad idea. Rookie D not paired with a veteran also a mistake. You'll have a hard time convincing me otherwise.

What is the logic in making this game "unavailable in your area" ? It's a preseason game, it's not on sportsnet +, so what does anyone gain by not making it available? It's almost like they don't want fans.

Cozens was rushed and the kid line as your 2nd line was stupid, Risto was rushed, Meyers was definitely rushed. There's a list and it doesn't matter. The main thing on all of them is minutes, roles, and responsibilities. Power for example should have had less minutes and sheltered minutes along with more one on one coaching. Since we didn't have veterans to mentor him on ice we should have hired an assistant to work with him one on one. Jay McKee would have been good for example. They placed him 2nd pairing and he saw big minutes as a rookie. It was stupid and that's the definition of "rushed". Scoring stats don't matter for rookie D either. It's about learning D.

I feel you but am undecided on this. Helenius is more NHL ready than other prospects so if he earns it I have a hard time holding him back. I want to see Doan show something. I do not want him on the roster simply to validate a trade. I want to see something out of him that says he deserves a spot. If Helenius is markedly better than Doan I'm going Helenius.

Ya, lol, preseason. I just watched Seattle put a beat down on Edmonton. Anyone want to argue Seattle's a better team than the Oilers? Wasn't our preseason record with no NHLers (as they went to Europe) stellar last year too? This is why I just look at guys with something to prove and see what they do. We can be excited at the potential of Helenius and Mrtka. Georgiev might not suck. Kesselring might upgrade the D and Norris and Thompson might have some chemistry. That's all I can say at the moment.

They might keep 3 goalies up but if both Lyon and Georgiev are playing well you try to trade UPL (unlikely with his salary) and if there's no trade you waive him and send UPL down. Nobody is picking up that salary unless they are goalie desperate at the moment. If there is someone goalie desperate there's your trade. Otherwise, obviously if Georgiev or Lyon are not playing well then you just waive one of them. No big deal.

I can see this happening too (especially if this team fails again this year) but if Jarmo is made GM would he hire Appert as coach? If he did, that would mean he's just another Pegula puppet. Otherwise I'd expect him to work with his own people and a clean slate of all new coaches. That is the only thing that would give me hope for change. A new development guy is a good idea. It's been a weakness.

Faster yes, Have to utilize that though. Many if not most teams seem to be looking at big centers and some of them are slower. Sabres aren't small but overall they are not that physical so we will have to see how that works in a league that appears to be headed more towards the physical this year due to the Florida effect. and the cup winner is always a thing. The thing for me is we always try to be a possession team and we end up with lots of perimeter play. I truly believe this team would be successful if we did two simple things. One, emphasize physicality more (not every guy just a few bigger and tougher bodies) and two, play a simpler north south game. Dump it in and use that speed to chase. Heavy forecheck to create turnovers and then that dreaded drop pass might actually work if the D pinches with the forecheck. It's the Florida plan. It would work. This team is a little more physical. Not sure it's enough. Don't think it is. We shall see.

Sportsnet didn't deem this game worthy of coverage. So I only saw the highlight package and couldn't tell much from it. So only one question, was Norris any good? Did he have chemistry with Tage?

Bruins used this on their cup run. So maybe not. Just bring back the Sabre Dance. BUT make it the Dave Edmunds Love Sculpture version.

That's all true. I just thought he was more of a physical thumper than he appears to be. Being in Utah I didn't see much of either of them last year so it's just my wrong impression. We'll see how he actually is over time.

Maybe. Sportsnet had the Columbus broadcast on. They were saying Danforth was their "swiss army knife who could play up and down the roster". I didn't see anything to validate that but if it's true maybe he's that injury plug in guy.