triumph_communes

Looks like Eichel’s old agent overplayed the injury card and thought Buffalo would have gotten desperate and dumped him for nothing. Well played Kevyn. Eichel blinked first.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/intelligence-community-releases-covid-origin-report-without-conclusion-on-where-virus-originated Fed intelligence just gave full merit to the lab leak theory that Eleven would have banned me for for over a year for purporting. Funny how that works.

That’s how leftists work. If they can’t get their way they burn it all down. Sorry not sorry for ignoring the hilarious identity fallacy Eleven purports, lol

ESPN fluff piece is fluffy

Lamar has been figured out. Honeymoon over.

Yes, so I will admit here this is where it starts to get into poor information territory. However, this vice video goes into a good background as to why there is bad vaccine data around women and menstrual cycles (symptoms related to menstrual cycles have a history of being purposefully ignored in research and they have a really hard time distinguishing levels of it) https://m.facebook.com/vicenews/videos/the-unstudied-link-between-the-covid-vaccine-and-periods/587895985550914/ I couple this with personal anecdotes of clotting type effects that had never been observed in females lives until the two weeks following the second jab of a Pfizer puts it all too close to home for me Another trustable source going through some background on women: https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/health/coronavirus/menstrual-changes-to-be-expected-after-covid-19-vaccine-during-pandemic-experts-1.5391236 also in response to any claims about LNO getting to ovaries etc they simply cite data of ‘only 35 confirmed cases out of million if jabs’, when good scientists know this is junk way to report things. 90+% of people don’t report anything to VAERS or minor symptoms are immediately ignored as not related. I believe just recently a top BBC reporter just died to brain clots immediately after a jab so it’s getting harder for them to publicly ignore.

Double standards. I show the source references CDC uses and they’re glossed over by the ones jumping to conclusions based on poor statistics. Why are you getting high and mighty about quotes and paraphrases when nobody here is willing to talk p values and n=14 studies with controls having no clue about vaccination status being junk science?

I’m vaccinated myself. My focus of caution has been for younger females. Y’all need to stop putting words in people’s mouths and thinking they’re extremists.

The opposite was never proven to be true. Only theorized. I linked the four ‘studies’ the CDC used to justify those statements earlier and they’re all questionable and hopeful at best. Y’all must not science much to be working in such ultimatums.

The absurd claims that the vaccine is perfectly safe and anyone who dares question this should be banished. Fact is the innocent marker protein isn’t so innocent. And even the original rat study for LNP localization showed liver and ovary build up. Any scientist claiming that the high dose somehow is proof it can’t spread in humans is selling snake oil. There’s no shortage of breakthrough medicines discovered every year and they all fall apart in human trials because drug delivery is so damn difficult. mRNA was no exception until politicians had motive to throw all caution to the side to get a cure all.

Mods are apparently unable to go back a few posts and read links to now? Walensky said CDC investigations have found that the amount of virus present in vaccinated people infected with Delta is similar to the levels found in unvaccinated people with Delta infections. That's an indication that vaccinated people can easily transmit the virus — even though they're less likely to get sick on the whole. https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-fully-vaccinated-people-can-spread-delta-variant-2021-7?op=1

https://news.northeastern.edu/2021/02/08/covid-19-can-affect-the-blood-its-spike-protein-may-be-the-culprit/

You’re the one who made those claims. The Director literally said the vaccine isn’t lowering the spread of delta variant. You’re blaming on unvaccinated to create a divide the very person you hold holy disagrees with.

Link to director is a few posts ago Sweden being in the clear and the US going through a second wave is callous? Empathy isn’t what policy should be made from. If they wanted to end a million deaths per year tomorrow they’d enforce speed limits. Policy draws a line everywhere.

The all knowing eleven who fully understands how vaccines with respiratory viruses and mutations work. The spike protein is a coagulant on its own. Fact. If the spike protein or generation of it leaves the injection site it can cause blood clots, fact. The novel mRNA treatment with a novel delivery mechanism is not thoroughly studied is also a fact. The one rat model isn’t proof of anything. Silencing people because you don’t understand the science well enough? How Democratic of you. It’s not screaming fire in a threater to be hesitant.

This is pure misinformation. The CDC director literally came out last month contradicting your assertions here, particularly with regards to the Delta variant. They even said it seems odd given the intent of the method, but they can’t argue with the facts. Instead here you are with complete conspiracy heresay about the source and outbreaks. The irony is completely surpassing you.

https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2021/07/is-sweden-vindicated-on-covid/

The vaccine is just going to prevent deaths. It’s a respiratory disease — it’s not going to stop transmission. If this hasn’t been clear you’ve been wishful thinking and not listening to the unbiased scientists this whole time. There is a good argument we should have not done anything significant and let it run it’s course and we’d be better off. Just quarantine the elderly. Didn’t help standard medical protocol accelerated people’s deaths early on. There are countries like Sweden who followed this approach on and they’re doing fine.

Nothing has ever said stopped. They stated ‘growing body of evidence’ and ‘reduce’. I then linked that growing body of evidence that is clearly all no better than wishful thinking but wi the huge fundamental flaws as far as data science goes. Go search for the CDC director who clearly says it doesn’t stop transmission and how the Delta variant is showing breakthrough which would undermine most of the wishful ‘reduction’ claims. If you think this is a non answer then stop replying here’s a link: https://www.rollcall.com/2021/07/30/cdc-report-shows-vaccinated-people-can-spread-covid-19/

Well the one debate from the get go is vaccines that don’t kill only mitigate will accelerate the mutation of the strains and is why they’re getting strong enough now to get kids sick.

Please point out the lie

I can’t help you if you can’t distinguish those statements. The nuance is what science is all about. It’s pretty clear.

That’s all there is

All they’ve done is a few very tiny studies show a lower viral load. Read the references. None of which have statistical power of any sort to them. The statement above is pure conjecture. Presenting otherwise is BAD science. There is much better data/science that ivermectin Dave’s patients than there is to back this claim. Jones NK, Rivett L, Seaman S, Samworth RJ, Warne B, Workman C, et al. Single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine protects against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Elife. 2021;10. Levine-Tiefenbrun M, Yelin I, Katz R, Herzel E, Golan Z, Schreiber L, et al. Initial report of decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Nat Med. 2021;27(5):790-2. McEllistrem MC, Clancy CJ, Buehrle DJ, Lucas A, Decker BK. Single dose of a mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is associated with lower nasopharyngeal viral load among nursing home residents with asymptomatic COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. Petter E MO, Zuckerman N, et al. Initial real world evidence for lower viral load of individuals who have been vaccinated by BNT162b2. medRxiv. 2021;https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.08.21251329v1external icon.

Yes. Though I will argue for healthy individuals below 35 the risk reduction is very debateable. Granted that excludes all the obese people that’s 70% of the populace.. but I’ll digress Same with all the nonsense with kids now. The ones dying are the morbidly obese kids yet they’re making it out to be something else. It’s Darwinism finally catching up