Hank

It's one loss. Klinsmann's a good coach. They will be fine.

There's nothing presumptive about it. Clinton lost.

Next year YOU run a fantasy gambling contest and YOU put the time and effort into keeping track of it and then YOU can run it any way YOU want to. Okay?

Simply priceless :w00t: LGR, I often give you grief, frequently unwarranted. I commend your ability to remain level headed regarding the outcome and necessary(?) changes.

Bet is invalid. No bet. Pastajoe and N'eo, your running totals are a little off. Again, the week goes from Monday thru Sunday. Some of you did not bet the MIN-TOR-OTT week and are on the "Failed to meet the weekly betting requirement" list. If I made a mistake and you placed a bet that I missed please reference the post number. Ignore the blue. At the beginning of the week I make everyone blue and change them to black as they place bets. Standings: 16NOV16 Thru post #468 Rakish $2,195 Pastajoe $2,010 Touched by Boyes $1,865 Taro T $1,820 Eleven $1,750 TrueBlueGED $1,635 Wyldnwoody44 $1,370 Drunkard $1,315 Qwksndmonster $1.235 Ubkev $1,100 Claude Verret $1,045 N’eo $945 Hank $520 Wjag $475 Sabills $245 Busted Cereal Out because they did not meet the weekly bet requirement Pi2000 Murray’s Rats Derrico SwampD MattPie Wildcard 3putt JujuFish If you feel I made a mistake please let me know…

Blues units are 200 each, you have 245. Do you want one unit on the blues or two on the Sabres?

the blues are 200 per unit. You have 245. Do you want one unit on the blues or two units on the Sabres?

I like the ROC line, that's what I'm going to call them. Good call ink!

Pi, Catching up on the standings I noticed that bet you lost that didn't count because you made it late was the only bet you made that week. The rules are clear, you must bet at least once per week and the week goes from Monday to Sunday. You failed to meet the weekly bet requirement, your out. Sorry.

As bad as Teump is, your gal lost to him!! SCOREBOARD!!!

And fifth in scoring I think, it's just not fair.

Again, I'm trying to talk about NATO and you're redirecting the conversation to Trump. There's no need for it. I don't appreciate it. I've stated before that I've grown tired of my schadenfreude regarding Clintons loss, but it people like you who keep doing this that irritates the hell out of me and you make it very difficult for me to not continue to be an about the election. Thank you eleven.

I don't know what the financial agreement is between the NATO countries. Logically, I would think that the countries responsibility would be some kind of % tied to their GDP or something like that. Whatever the financial agreement is, are all the countries fulfilling their obligation? I've served with NATO forces, they don't impress me. Based on me experience I question their value to us and wonder if NATO is worth funding. I think my questions regarding NATO are fair, why do you insist on redirecting the discussion to Trump?

Godd didn't leave, he was banned. What happened to we've?

Sabres +170 Blues -200 I'll update the standings tomorrow.

That makes sense, thank you.

I asked quite a few questions. Maybe I am ignorant. Maybe I'm trying to learn. How about giving some thought and some form of answers instead of belittling me?

K-9, why do you think NATO will go away? What are the pros to keeping NATO intact? Do you believe the other countries are paying their fair share? Does the U.S. Need NATO? If so, why?

Good for them, should make a huge difference.

Good for Carrier, I like his speed.

So?

I love chapelle

I can't give up Gordon.

Both losing wasn't an option though. You and I both got what we wanted, anyone but Clinton.