Hank

I've been saying forever, the reasons may vary, but both sides equally suck. To the bolded, I agree, but I doubt I'll see it my lifetime.

Yes, I know, Charlie Kirk. The relevant part of the link is the CNN clip. That man has a lot to say, not much viewed as good.

https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/06/27/investing/stock-market-record-dow-sandp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=17512105622785&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2025%2F06%2F27%2Finvesting%2Fstock-market-record-dow-sandp I hope some of you were smart enough to buy the dip when I recommended

I don't dispute anything you say here. But, it's a pattern. I say something that doesn't align with someone else's view/feelings, they attack me, i respond in kind, you feel the need to admonished me. You give a strong impression of selective moderation based on who the poster is with no regard to what's actually being said. Opposing views are not welcomed here, that's why it's become an echo chamber with three posters. I've made it clear I'm no fan Trump, but I should be able to acknowledge the rare occasion he appears to do something right. Apologies for the previous snark. Moving on...

I'd call it equivalent to your constant use of "MAGA scum" every time you get triggered.

Yet you're perfectly fine with him telling me to stay on a different forum with people who don't think? Shame on you. You're a moderator, do better.

I would think you're more likely right than not. I'm pretty sure I saw that man on CNN some time ago, I thought it was interesting that he pivoted from his previous position. Don't know if he's right or wrong and I'm not knowledgeable enough about it to offer an opinion. Either way, my primary reason for linking the article was... ...this 😆 I needed something this morning to put a smile on my face. I knew I could count on this idiot to give me a TDS inflicted Trump rant for me to laugh at. Again 🤣🤣🤣

https://nypost.com/2025/06/27/business/top-economist-says-trump-may-have-outsmarted-all-of-us-on-tariffs/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social

Whatever you say Homelander. Cope and seethe.

I assume you feel the same way about District Judge Brian Murphy who stated he plans on defying a Supreme Court ruling?

Coming down on the side of Iran's nuclear program seems a very odd position to take.

Sharp as a tack.

Just curious, did you buy low when I suggested? I bought all the Nvidia I could. As much as I hate Trump, his brazen, and I'm guessing illegal, tanking of the market made me a killing.

I don't understand your point.

Of course it was! Iran can not have nuclear weapons, Trump did the right thing hitting them while they're weak.

Okay, fair enough. You make some valid points.

No. And, I don't.

I want to laugh, but I don't get the reference.

Seems a bit bold to call Rep. Harriet Hageman a liar.

I think we're in lockstep on this, my point was likely poorly made. Selective outrage. Selective coverage with bias. Fox News is a tool used by the republican party, MSNBC/CNN is a tool used by the democratic party.

Federal employees under contract are being fired under Trump and Fox News is the only network that is NOT outraged. Soldiers, also Federal employees under contract, were fired under Clinton and Obama. Fox News was the only network that WAS outraged. What's the difference?

I'm hoping you're wrong but I suspect you are not. I believe if the Dems can/will not unify we'll see the Republicans majority grow in both the House and Senate come 26.

Interesting read. Don't agree with him, but Interesting none the less. https://jeffreycarter.substack.com/p/the-tariff-game