Jump to content

thewookie1

Members
  • Posts

    8,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thewookie1

  1. I’d rather keep Peterka but I saw an offer that was pretty good Rossi, Spacek and a 26 2nd for Peterka and our 26 3rd Rossi wants 7x7mil It would all depend on Peterka’s ask.
  2. Kek has been involved with the drafting of Gavrikov in LA, Pieterangelo in VGK and apparently was a mentor for Zito so that’s a positive
  3. All I fear is him wanting to acquire Gudbranson
  4. Well Oettinger makes 8.25mil for the next 8 years so that would be a tad rough for a couple years
  5. https://puckgm.puckpedia.com/rosters/591851 Here's a theoretical Rossi for Peterka deal.
  6. Well I would rather him not help a conference rival prevent us from getting a playoff position. Plus I want nothing to do with K Miller seeing as most Rangers fans want to try him at forward like we had wanted with Risto for many years. Plus eeing as Miller is an American versus Schneider being a Canadian we know which they’d choose if all else equal In the end I just don’t want a new iteration of traded player thrives while our return fumbles and or bumbles around getting us no closer to the playoffs. That and I’m sick of the media pushing the agenda of moving players out of Buffalo so they can be in bigger markets. They rarely say anything about how we somehow still have incompetence in and around the franchise yet have every possible scoop on a good Sabre being pursued by * insert large market here*
  7. https://puckgm.puckpedia.com/rosters/584013
  8. If I get Kesselring I'd look at Doan's kid
  9. Rosen was always a pick that was based on the idea of him being an earlier version of Eklund in SJ. They tried to get to Eklund and were unable to get there. After all that was the original Reinhart trade, moving up from Philly’s 1st to LAK’s 1st using Reinhart as the piece. We don’t know what else was involved. However the guy LA liked fell to them so they turned us down and we pivoted to the Florida offer of a 1st the next year and Levi. In that regard it wouldn’t have made much sense to draft another goalie at 13? since we had Portillo and Levi(to be) already on the depth chart but both had College careers. Rosen reminded them of Eklund from the year prior and thus they took him with the hope he’d take a similar path.
  10. Tage lit up a guy at the end of the 3rd too. Bulldozed him
  11. He still has some value, he’s had a very good season in Rochester. I doubt he has super high value but he isn’t just worth some random 7th round pick
  12. Apparently Paul Hamilton said something that was misconstrued on Twitter which created this rumor
  13. Hopefully my theory ends up correct. Essentially Levi plays much better, the shorter the time frame there is between games. Game 1 against Syracuse started rough but they won anyway. Game 2 & 3 then Levi dominated. Game 1 against Laval was rough but Game 2 he played very solid before resting until the following Wednesday where he looked rough. Game 4 and hopefully Game 5 Levi should dominate again
  14. If we go 5x9mil then defer 12.5mil of the contract. It would drop the cap hit to 8.45mil
  15. Then as per usual our team is royally screwed Trading Tuch is trading practically the only player with any love for this city that isn't purely based on transactional history. Resigning at 9mil is overpay at the Nth degree for a 30 year old God forbid I ever see my team be good and have players I like
  16. Graves makes Muel look good so God no
  17. I'm offering Tuch 5x7.689mil to start
  18. Levi's play has me slightly concerned because my idea would of been to move UPL to Philly with Muel for something and then get Demko for Quinn. Then sign another solid backup that Levi could hop if Demko got hurt yet again or fell flat on his face. Now doubt has crept in a bit and I don't want to leave us after next season with a potential goalie room of Demko doing really bad or good then leaving, Levi being a major question mark and no one else. As for defenders, its too much of a crapshoot as to what truly we can do to sure up the back end. We all have a similar idea of getting a defensive specialist but those aren't easy to come by nor pay for.
  19. He was a -38, the next closest was -17 Season Age Team Lg GP TOI CF CA CF% CF% rel FF FA FF% FF% rel oZS% dZS% 2023-24 27 CGY NHL 78 1858.5 2069 2007 50.8 -0.6 1500 1429 51.2 -0.6 54.8 45.2 2024-25 28 CGY NHL 81 1942.8 1987 2191 47.6 -6.4 1425 1577 47.5 -5.9 44.4 55.6 He also had 36 total hits last season Weegar, the guy I'd want, led the team with +18, he did play the opposite start zone (56% offense), had nicer analytics and over 200 hits
  20. Andersson only has 1 year until UFA and had terrible numbers last year. Not exactly what we are looking to add
  21. Certainly feels like they want to have the first unattended game in NHL history without a CoVid excuse
  22. I don't want them to look down the road so to speak but at very least look for potholes or other hazards on the road. Nothing we can hope to acquire would make me feel good trading next year's 1st.
×
×
  • Create New...