North Buffalo

See now you were very clear I agree with you wholeheartedly

Its not about caring or not. Its about priorities feeding family first in some cases.

You really dont understand the problem with the above rhetoric combined with following BLM extremists with the term criminal both terms dont clarify a distinction but in fact reinforce a perception of distasteful bias on your part. I suggest you take a remedial English class focusing in clarity of sentence structure and meaning as well as a psych class in self honesty.

And that is your opinion.... Just as voting for Clinton or someone else is complicit with their ideas even if we disagree. Your statement like JJ's is one of absoluting personal attacks... Not one of understanding distinctions. Great for political rhetoric, not so much for intellectual discussion and full of hypocrisy.

Again distorting your own and someone else's statements. I never implied I knew what you meant only that your statement appeared intentionally to imply something quite different than what you back tracked later on. Based on this statement gotta cry foul and question you sincerity if you gonna make a statement like this. Grow a pair and take some responsibilty for your mistatements or acknowledge your onesided bias and stop claiming to be even close to being reasonable.

Not even close, really do I have to do this for you. Sigh... Simple rhetorical clarification. You could have stated that in the minority, there are some extremists in BLM that put others in harms way. I'dhave agreed with you then, there is that element though I believe its in the minority. Putting the term criminal after that term seals that deal even more as to your absolutizing bias... Kinda if I called all folks like you right wing knuckle draggers.... or worse... though a few of you might be and the rest sincere concerned citizens about societal safety and violence... Do a better job of clarifying your distinctions, or not and there are those on this board who will help you.

Oh but you did by your obfuscation linking the two terms BLM and extremists together.... and therefore show how hardened and unreasonable you really are. But you go on pushing that onsided rhetoric as fair and balanced... There is that issue and experimental design attempts to quantify subjective criteria and imply them on the human condition..., Lies, more lies and statistics is overstating it. But stats can be manipulated and leading or biased questions can give you any results you desire.

TY on sched.

That doesnt even pass the smell test, you didnt even come close to parsing that statement, let alone making any kind of distinction. Still nice rhetorical retort... . Really??!!! Again horse pucky...

Again not accurate... and BLM are not extremists.., though some are and should be criticisized, but again lumping or implying motivations of the few on the majority is a major problem of political discourse... though an simplistic effective tool to counter the other side even if innaccurate.

Or claim morality when it is actually some sort of self interest ... or self righteousness.

Ah experimental design rears its ugly head and its innate conservative bias... thought that crap died off nuts... narcissistic slanted inductive reasoning and labeling... their bias show through in that conservatives are sensitive to all six of the so so called labeled types of political thinking, whereas liberals and libertarians only 2 each. Horse pucky..,

Yeh but he asking why both... darn that is annoying. Id send a note to the NHL

. Oof yeh kinda kumbaya stuff there. Nice idea but not part of the political discourse so please refrain from this line of thinking as it offends my political sensibilities...:)

LMao, noice bah... gonna need to use that one.

Or maybe it does and is fair political fodder to say so. Otherwise its not politics.

Sorry, no can do... I am am admitted retired political and by definition a hypocrit. It wouldnt be a political thread otherwise. If you want decorum... go play hockey... Besides it works!

I disagree health in HRCs case and mental stability in Donalds case are big factor to weigh in choosing a Pres.

So I fall into the category of disagreement with you N.... This is a political discussion thread and character assassination has a long torrid hx as an effective tool in American politics including on this board. I can only assume you took something he said way too personally and should think about recusing yourself frommoderating this thread for a while.... Even then, what has been reported as swamp's in indiscretions seems to me moderate compared the current political debate in the US and assuming it character assassination it should be exposed as such... that being said the difficulty in combating character assassination shows what an effective tool it really is. Gain a thicker skin to moderate politics imo.

Nice sarcasm... good response lol... Still would hammer Trump on law and order regardless of HRC.

Russian hackers now have leaked private medical information about Olympic atheletes. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-37352326. And these are the lawless folks Trump associates with and applauds. How the crap is he even qualified to be a Presidential candidate when he doesnt even believe in the rule of law.

im told he puts out 1 of these a year... all of the ridiculous driving sort. this is the 9th one according to a friend.

Noice vid though luv that lake scene...

yeh not sure Ill watch another game this year... Sigh lets go Sabres--- hockey season starts in less then a month.

Chukarov I think will be bette r in 2 years than Ghule and has size.