All Activity

I’d play if you need a replacement.

I don’t value Casey Mittlestadt. I don’t see him as a “solid” veteran. Very unsolid in my eyes.

Do you honestly think this roster will stay healthy all year? Your playoff reliance is all on 3 youngsters stepping up all at once (Benson, Kulich, Quinn). If they don't, or only one does, it's nowhere near enough. Do you not value depth and internal competition? If you don't add one more solid veteran (be it Mitts or whoever) how do you sit underperformers without depleting the line up? Isn't that an ongoing issue with this team?

There’s little doubt Mitts is the most proven player, but it would be very hard for me to predict which one would help the Sabres most this year. As bad as Jack Quinn was last year, he probably had a better season than Casey and I think he’s got a higher ceiling. What’s more likely: Kulich taking a step offensively or Casey defensively? Because there is no doubt the Sabres need the more reliable player. Not sure what happened to Casey this year because he’s better than what he showed. But how does a player go from +12 in 60ish games in Buffalo to -12 in 60ish games in Denver to -17 in 18 games in Boston? I mean he’s certain to bounce back with a career year with the Bruins because Boston, but in Buffalo?

Reporting is that Trump will host a sit down with Putin and Zelenskyy, hopefully a peace treaty will soon follow.

There’s little doubt Mitts is the most proven player, but it would be very hard for me to predict which one would help the Sabres most this year. As bad as Jack Quinn was last year, he probably had a better season than Casey and I think he’s got a higher ceiling. What’s more likely: Kulich taking a step offensively or Casey defensively? Because there is no doubt the Sabres need the more reliable player.

We have one open spot. I tried looking back at the waiting list. I believe @Taro T has been waiting. I also see @ExWNYer. My poor memory says Taro has been waiting for a couple years. Is this correct or did I forget someone?

SDS Labattblue pi2000 wyldnwoody North Buffalo Hank Porous Five Hole Gilbert11 @Derrico ❓ @Norcal ❓ @Andrew Amerk ❓ Open

Let’s assume the following: - a team’s goal is to win now; and - salaries aren’t an issue . Given those parameters, if you polled every NHL GM and HC in the NHL and told them they could have only one of Quinn, Kulich, or Mittelstadt, I believe the vast majority would take Mittelstadt.

This I will agree with.

Colorado bailed on him quickly after paying him. His D is horrid. Ack ! No !

Then fork it, let him take Malenstyn's spot as the 13th F. Or put him in Danforth's spot in the top 12 (not necessarily on the 4th line, but in the top 12 bumping somebody else to there) and bring Danforth back in as soon as somebody inevitably breaks. How often are ALL 12 guys Ruff wants to have in the lineup going to actually be IN the lineup. Really want them to have 12 NHLers available when even 2 or 3 guys break. They haven't had that in, oh, about 14 years at least. Again, am only willing to give up a 4th for him, so if he doesn't force his way into the top 12, no great loss. AND, he's not the 1st choice. But would rather have him in the lineup than Rosen and he's close to the next man up right now.

I don’t care if specifically Mitts is added to this roster. As I have stated on a number of posts is that I wished that the GM would have added another second-line forward to the mix. @Taro T mentioned a couple of players that would be appealing. So far, that hasn’t happened. I find that disappointing.

Im not convinced Mitts is going to be much of an upgrade over Quinn anymore. Danforth, he’s your grit and forecheck upgrade, right? So much for that. He’s a roster spot, and one with a 3rd contract cap hit. He needs to displace someone.

How about players competing for positions and roles? If he is outplayed then his role is diminished. If he outplays players then he earns his spot. Who he displaces or doesn’t displace should be predicated on his play. I’m not bothered by internal competition because I see it as a good thing.

Not to speak for John and not asked, but will answer anyhow. Quinn or Danforth initially. The guy that's inevitably injured 2 - 5 games in, after that (unless of course, he's the inevitiably injured guy, but he's been pretty resilient since that injury sustained vs Moe-ray-all in the opener a few years back). And would rather have Rust for the experience or Roslovic for the someone different factor to take the place of Quinn or Danforth iniitally. But really want them to have 1 or 2 more bodies that can move into the top 6 in a pinch and not look completely out of place and also to create additional competition for the young guys. Again, he isn't the 1st choice, but he'd be better than no additional F adds.

What “the board” wants is someone who goes to the net that has proven they can be effective in a top 6 role on a good team doing it, not a couple of kids that are still finding their way towards it.

Who are you displacing with him that improves the roster?

1) Luukkonnen: This team is 10 points better if he returns to the form he showed two years ago 2) Power: Analytically, the most obvious flaw in the Sabres lineup is how they lost any matchup when Dahlin wasn't on the ice. Swapping Timmins poise for Clifton's juggling hand grenades should help, and Kesselring's competence and physicality should help more. But Power has the skillset to be carrying one of those guys, rather than counting on them to be the boosters. He needs to start earning his paycheque. 3) Norris: Jiri Kulich and Ryan McLeod could be a viable 2/3 centre spine, but no team is going to make the playoffs with them eating all the hard minutes at centre ice. Norris isn't a 1C, but he can certainly hold the fort in ways the other two can't, particularly stapled to an top winger like Tage or Tuch. Getting 75 games of his full potential dramatically improves our depth and playoff chances.

Adding a player like Mitts also has residual benefits due to his versatility as a center and wing. And as I stated in the prior post he has the ability to move up the lines when needed due to injuries or just to shake up the lines. Another benefit is that he would be useful on the second PP unit as a setup player. I don’t want to get fixated on Mitts as the player to provide more flexibility to the roster. If another player could provide the same utility to our current roster I would be receptive to it. And if the cost would be a second round pick, I would find that to be a good deal.

Aye yi yi, man. This is something akin to Stockholm Syndrome. Mittelstadt was a limited and flawed player on non-playoff (Sabre) teams. When he got moved to a perennial playoff team, he crashed out and eventually got traded. Since that trade, he appears to have been exposed for what he is: A tweener/marginal NHL player. But you do it so effortlessly!

I realize 'the board' isn't a entity unto itself and I'm not saying this is you. But it's bizarre to me that "the board" complains consistently that the Sabres don't backcheck and don't get to the net while at the same time wants no part of Doan or Benson in the top 6 and wants to bury Greenway on the 4th line. It's a fallacy to say this is the same forward group. Doan, Danforth, Greenway and Norris —1/3 of the starting lineup — combined for 37 games last year for the Sabres. Maybe there is a problem with how they are being coached to play, but the player personnel up front is much better suited for they type of game they need to play than it was.

Florida forechecks hard and reloads in the natural zone. It's very effective.

Personally, wouldn't send out a 2nd for him either. If the B's would take a 4, would definitely make the trade in lieu of anything else happening. Would need to be closer to the season to be willing to go to giving up a 3 for him.