Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, dudacek said:

So, is Danforth or Doan placeholding for Tuch?

I'd imagine Tuch slots into the 2RW and pushes everyone else down a line.

1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

Jfc we're excited about Geersten, really? Really? 

Just ordered my Geersten jersey. This is our year, truly.

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

 

 

That second line is like bleach in the eyes. Thankfully line 3 looks fine 

Though even there Danforth is fairly dollar store 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
8 minutes ago, Mustache of God said:

I'd imagine Tuch slots into the 2RW and pushes everyone else down a line.

Just ordered my Geersten jersey. This is our year, truly.

 

2 minutes ago, Thorny said:

That second line is like bleach in the eyes. Thankfully line 3 looks fine 

Though even there Danforth is fairly dollar store 

I think Engel's ordering is skewing perception.

With Lindy hammering home defence, my bet is Tuch goes with Zucker and McLeod in the real 2nd line that you can play against other good lines.

Kulich/Quinn is the Vanek/Roy is the sheltered offensive 3rd line combo.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, dudacek said:

 

I think Engel's ordering is skewing perception.

With Lindy hammering home defence, my bet is Tuch goes with Zucker and McLeod in the real 2nd line that you can play against other good lines.

Kulich/Quinn is the Vanek/Roy is the sheltered offensive 3rd line combo.

 

Damn me and my skewed perception 

I forgot about this year’s annual edition of the new “Vanek Roy” line 

Edited by Thorny
Posted (edited)

Interestingly we still refer to it as the “Vanek and Roy” line because in the 19 years since no other prophesized versions have capably supplanted the memory 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
1 minute ago, Thorny said:

Damn me and my skewed perception 

I forgot about this year’a annual addition of the new “Vanek Roy” line 

You're supposed to come into camp already in game shape.

Sabrespace needs your razor-sharp wit and gentle insight if we have any chance of making it through this year intact.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, dudacek said:

Add Geertsen to this mix as a potential 14th forward.

I wondered about this back when he signed, but Lindy name-dropping him in the presser reinforced it.

If they are serious about “culture” - and I think they are - he’s in the running to make the team in an Andrew Peters role.

 

 

1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

Jfc we're excited about Geersten, really? Really? 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Thorny said:

Interestingly we still refer to it as the “Vanek and Roy” line because in the 19 years since no other prophesized versions have capably supplanted the memory 

Cozens Peterka Quinn in 2023?

 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, dudacek said:

You're supposed to come into camp already in game shape.

Sabrespace needs your razor-sharp wit and gentle insight if we have any chance of making it through this year intact.

All work and no play make thorny a dull boy 

Posted
8 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Cozens Peterka Quinn in 2023?

 

I can’t even remember who the third guy was at this point but as Vanek / Roy alone had more points in 2006 than those 3 combined this is one I won’t concede 

Posted
51 minutes ago, dudacek said:

So, is Danforth or Doan placeholding for Tuch?

I think every rw after Tage is up 1 line compared to when Tuch is there. 

10 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Cozens Peterka Quinn in 2023?

 

Except it didn't work and was the 2nd line. 

Posted
Just now, LGR4GM said:

I think every rw after Tage is up 1 line compared to when Tuch is there. 

At the very least it drives home the magnitude of needing to get Tuch signed 

(though again I really, really don’t see it being an issue) 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Thorny said:

At the very least it drives home the magnitude of needing to get Tuch signed 

(though again I really, really don’t see it being an issue) 

Shows how little depth this team has and there's almost nothing coming to supplement it. 

Posted
Just now, LGR4GM said:

Shows how little depth this team has and there's almost nothing coming to supplement it. 

Thankfully we have a plan to make it up by simply committing to playing defence - that was always on Adams’ ledger for “Year 6”

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Helenius in 2026, and Ziemer and Poltapov in 2027. Here we go!

Here we go now here we go now here we go now here we go ah ah ah ah 

Posted
2 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Helenius in 2026, and Ziemer and Poltapov in 2027. Here we go!

I like Ziemer but idk if that's a 70pt winger, 50 is a stretch. Poltapov isn't real until he shows up. 

Posted (edited)

Both Tuch and Greenway push the slots down

 

Happy with the approach keeping that in mind. Bensen is useless if not top6, he just needed some strength.  Thompson played better on wing, the defense duties took him out of the offense too much.  I’m guessing they will swap with Norris for faceoffs here or there. Kulich will have a lot to prove as a 2/3C though. Bryson is at least not magically in the line up. Samuelsson might have a chance if he’s the least minutes 

Edited by triumph_communes
Posted
1 hour ago, LGR4GM said:

Jfc we're excited about Geersten, really? Really? 

At least it’s interesting. It’s got Dalton Smith vibes but I’m looking forward to the discourse he’s going to create among the fanbase. 

Posted

It’s so glaring it’s almost easily ignored due to sheer obviousness: but Norris sitting firmly at 1C is probably where things live or die. You simply need to say “Norris is 1C” for that to be driven home 

Just now, inkman said:

At least it’s interesting. It’s got Dalton Smith vibes but I’m looking forward to the discourse he’s going to create among the fanbase. 

Dalton Smith? Or Timothy Dalton

 IMG_9598.thumb.jpeg.a2bd60761b11b0f3455f21679eb2ec05.jpeg

Posted
4 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Fixed that for you 😇

It’s actually kinda funny. 10 years of posting, all through the absolute muck. All of it 

Relatively positive poster, all things considered 

  • Thanks (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...