Bmwolf21 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I think we've reached the point where someone needs to do some google and nail this one down. I think this is it: Rule 78.2: (vii) When video review confirms the scoring of a goal at one end of the ice, any goal scored at the other end on the same play must be disallowed. http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26489 Next section goes into more detail (emphasis mine): 78.6 Video Review - Any potential goal requiring video review must be reviewed prior to or during the next stoppage of play. No goal may be awarded (or disallowed) as a result of video review once the puck has been dropped and play has resumed. See Rule 38. When a team scores an apparent goal that is not seen by the on-ice officials and play continues, the play shall be reviewed by the Video Goal Judge at the next stoppage of play. If the goal is confirmed by video review, the clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) is re-set to the time the goal was scored. If the goal is not confirmed by video review, no adjustment is required to the clock time. Only one goal can be awarded at any stoppage of play. If the apparent goal was scored by Team A, and is subsequently confirmed as a goal by the Video Goal Judge, any goal scored by Team B during the period of time between the apparent goal By Team A and the stoppage of play (Team B’s goal), the Team B goal would not be awarded. However, if the apparent goal by Team A is deemed to have entered the goal, albeit illegally (i.e. distinct kicking motion), the goal shall be disallowed by the Video Goal Judge and since the play should have stopped for this disallowed goal, no goal can be awarded to Team B on the same play. The clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) must be re-set to the time of the disallowed Team A goal and play resumed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickshaw Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I am almost 100% sure that is not correct. The review goes back to see if play should have been stopped due to a goal scored by the Sabres. Everything after that is negated if the goal is deemed to have occurred. Zero chance that a Canuck goal would have counted in that 2:08. That is what replay is for. The replay showed Buffalo's goal, therefore that 2:08 never happened. Plain and simple. Very simple. In fact the Rangers scored on the Canucks in game 6 of the Finals in '94, but low and behold the Canucks had already scored prior to the Rangers's goal. It was awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpandean Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Zero chance that a Canuck goal would have counted in that 2:08. That is what replay is for. The replay showed Buffalo's goal, therefore that 2:08 never happened. Plain and simple. Very simple. Yes, and BMWolf just took the "almost" out of my statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 put Adams between Vanek & Roy It's Adam, no s. Right now Luke is playing on the third line in Rochester between Voakes and Sydlowski. He's sliding down the organizational depth chart faster than an Ehrhoff slapper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I think this is it: Rule 78.2: (vii) When video review confirms the scoring of a goal at one end of the ice, any goal scored at the other end on the same play must be disallowed. http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26489 Next section goes into more detail (emphasis mine): 78.6 Video Review - Any potential goal requiring video review must be reviewed prior to or during the next stoppage of play. No goal may be awarded (or disallowed) as a result of video review once the puck has been dropped and play has resumed. See Rule 38. When a team scores an apparent goal that is not seen by the on-ice officials and play continues, the play shall be reviewed by the Video Goal Judge at the next stoppage of play. If the goal is confirmed by video review, the clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) is re-set to the time the goal was scored. If the goal is not confirmed by video review, no adjustment is required to the clock time. Only one goal can be awarded at any stoppage of play. If the apparent goal was scored by Team A, and is subsequently confirmed as a goal by the Video Goal Judge, any goal scored by Team B during the period of time between the apparent goal By Team A and the stoppage of play (Team B’s goal), the Team B goal would not be awarded. However, if the apparent goal by Team A is deemed to have entered the goal, albeit illegally (i.e. distinct kicking motion), the goal shall be disallowed by the Video Goal Judge and since the play should have stopped for this disallowed goal, no goal can be awarded to Team B on the same play. The clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) must be re-set to the time of the disallowed Team A goal and play resumed. Well, I stand corrected. Nicely done, BMWolf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChimp Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 Zero chance that a Canuck goal would have counted in that 2:08. That is what replay is for. The replay showed Buffalo's goal, therefore that 2:08 never happened. Plain and simple. Very simple. It sure is a good thing Jesus didn;t pick that time to show up again, eh? :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 It would appear we have reached an impasse ::pees on nfreeman's leg :: You, boy, 10 shillings if you fetch me a jug of water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jsixspd Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 I'm sure a hypothetical Canucks' goal would have been nullified - oh, THE HORROR...... :doh: hahaha, could that have provoked a .... *ahem*... RIOT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmwolf21 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 [/font][/color][/font][/color][/font][/color] Well, I stand corrected. Nicely done, BMWolf. Thank you sir. I like that the NHL has put the rulebook up on their website in HTML format in recent years. Before they would put it up as a PDF file and that was a pain in the backside to search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.