Jump to content

Derrico

Members
  • Posts

    9,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Derrico

  1. Don’t you also put a lot into this? Liger, I’m actually surprised you don’t love the pick.
  2. Liger - shouldn’t you love this? Don’t you put stock in relative age of the draftees?
  3. This is a good question. Sound like very different players but who has more potential? I have no idea myself but interested to hear. What say you Randall?
  4. Good thoughts neo. I made similar points to my buddy. Buffalo will be a big city to this kid. Maybe it’s an inferiority complex but I don’t think we have to worry about him holding out to play in New York or something.
  5. Also stick around today liger. We value your opinion of these prospects. Just isn’t the end of the world if it’s not the guy you wanted there,
  6. That’s fair Liger but just because they prefer USHL D it does not make it a lazy pick. They obviously are using this as a strategy. Puck moving D are so important today. The Montour trade shows that’s botts preference to go with mobile D. We don’t have a ton in the system now.
  7. What are we thinking in terms of development? Similar to Casey where’s he’s a one and done but this time in the CHL?Does he get a look at all early this season with Sabres if he thrives in training camp? Or is he going back regardless (as he probably should)? Only issue with CHL is its sabres or Lethbridge next season right? Ineligible for Rochester?
  8. Awesome. Perry was great on those early ducks cup teams. I like that his style seems unique to what the sabres have now.
  9. It’s too bad he shoots left. If he maxes out potential he sounds like a fast shutdown type d. Those are the exact traits I want for whoever pairs with Dahlin. I’ll be interested in watching his development.
  10. Well that doesn’t sound too bad. Am I allowed to be rational about the pick now?
  11. This statement applies to literally any prospect you would have taken here. Late first round /early second take a few years to develop. That is not specific to who was picked. just adding to your point as I think that’s what you were saying.
  12. The knee jerk reactions are quite commical considering the odds of a 31 OA making and the very limit into the vast majority of people are going off of. Have your opinion sure. But to be that upset over 31?
  13. Did not know that. Ok that’s cool then. Leafs 100 years it was all the talk. Just seems like it’s a bit overshadowed is all.
  14. I admit that I also wanted Zegras but what are the big issues you have with him? There are people who study these things for a living ranking Cozens 3rd overall in this draft. What are they and we missing?
  15. Seriously. How it's not a home and home with Vancouver is beyond me.
  16. No he didn't. Come on Liger, you're better than that.
  17. I'm sure he will go back. Is this one of those situations where after next year it's NHL or CHL? Don't hate preferring non-chl guys for this reason.
  18. This just makes sense. But notice how it says later rounds. As we saw tonight he will pick CHL players in the earlier rounds. Obviously not speaking to you Brawndo.
  19. I feel like that's a pretty solid hockey name.
  20. If we just drafted another Montour than our scouting staff is amazing. I don’t know anything about this guy but if he ends up as Montour in a few years I have no problem at all with the pick.
  21. Don’t feel bad. There will be a ton of overreactions but 2 percent of the people posting have actually watched in depth game tape. Liger. What does this even mean?
  22. Ugh. Hate the reactions but thinking of Laaksonen. Things will be ok.
  23. Not the guy that seemed obvious????
  24. Who is that
×
×
  • Create New...