Thorny

Holy overreactions Batman Im with you fine folks, I’m hurting from this one. I know. but let’s see how they adjust. Still lots of hockey left.

Awful game / result, whatever. Islanders are an annoying team to play against, good at what they do not out of it at all, playoff hunt wise. But biggest hurdle to clear isn’t the schedule, it’s not even the point gap: it’s the change in officiating playoff *chase* season apparently now has part and parcel

Absolute André Benoit

Kicking? too soon brah

True, but I’d wager to say the calls generally even out in the macro..like I said the problem is, even with even officiating the scenario where BOTH teams get away with more always hampers the higher skill team and we’ve been a high skill, track meet, run up the score team all year

Agree. But... *whispers* ..they should call the game by the rules all the time Shhhh, though

The fact these last 2 games have had a low amount of penalties called, both ways, is bad news for the Sabres. If the refs are doing the swallow the whistle thing early..ya it’s bad news for us and our top of the league pp unit Exactly

Not a condemnation merely a fact other words: we need them here

Every team has injuries.

Not going to win many games with Dahlin and Tage going scoreless

Lost it, btw

Coulda called a penalty there for goalie interference Yessir Oh they did

Heck of a save from youpee El

Made a great play then a poor one

Looks cosmetic

Yes sir Dominic..it’s not working. Time to let go of that “flow”

On talent

Ones that weren’t working sometimes just start working, I’ve found one now. Just keep trying, it’s so different this year and I assume going forward. It’s tough

no tv no stream make thorny go something something

Re: your small sample size selection there @Taro T I will say I don’t find the results of those games very compelling when our best game of the year was played without Samuelsson not only that, but prob our best game *defensively*. The problem with the “rally around it!” line of thinking is that it works both ways: could easily argue, without Samuelsson’s noted defensive presence in the lineup, the team rallied around a putting out a better defensive effort as a group. Saw it in Winnipeg. In the end, it’s easier to make up what Samuelsson provides than Dahlin. Dahlin is significantly better at offence than Samuelsson is at D. Dahlin is more advanced in his field, relative to other players with that strength league wide. Dahlin is also a better defender which makes the whole argument kinda wonky but, I digress

I’m not giving the “we’d be better off with Dahlin out for a game” thing credence, sorry. Unless, Game 7, cup final, you say right now you, Taro, would remove Dahlin first, given the choice. If gun to head you’d truly remove Dahlin before Samuelsson, for game 7, cup final, I’ll just concede the argument right now because to claim something that extreme, given your general aversion to hyperbole and favouring of reasoned statements, that you’ve foreseen something I haven’t and cannot grasp not even a joke. You’d remove Dahlin b/f Samuelsson, single must win playoff game? Sure, I’m on board by the power of grey skull !

No it’s pretty funny. Face is red etc etc Less known quote from Volker ”spelling is very difficult, especially if you are trying to spell words”

It is. I noticed that but didn’t think it substantially changed my statement. Maybe I faux pas -d Edit just realized I typed road lol Oh well, thought it was just the “to” “of” thing 😆 Im leaving it up

The board often reacts poorly to even the contemplation of questions like the OP proposed

Always a tough road of hoe