Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,456
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Hellebuyck being on the bench today will give him a first hand opportunity to learn something from UPL
  2. Right, on the same page then. I’m not resetting/canning KA this summer even if given the choice
  3. much wallowing my winnipeg? me whooping. 4-3 buffalo
  4. This makes me sound borderline insane. Lol I guess? Lol. Didn’t realize it had that “cutting off your ear for passion” vibe
  5. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/vVm8NMgVndwiyQKj/?mibextid=I8mCmY&startTimeMs=65000
  6. I agree with this: but I think there’s a chance he doesn’t make the same mistake twice re: his operations this offseason fool me once..
  7. To what, make it to the arena without getting lost? Probably
  8. Doing something stupid mathematically would he apropos for a team that’s behaved stupidly mathematically for 13 years
  9. I’m not an analytical nerd. A nerd, sure I try to take a wholistic approach to the data/experience It’s tough to divine much from our interactions because it mostly just involves you giving my posts eye rolls but yes, if you are the “my expectation is 2024/25 guy”: great. You’ve called your shot. I respect that
  10. This is ridiculous, and kinda hurts coming from you I make it a point to set expectations before the season and don’t shift: literally quoting you in another thread about how I refuse to back down from what we said was the expectation this year. I call my shots. I refuse not to. If we miss this year, we have failed. Saying I think we can make it is not a flip flop
  11. Devils and Caps both lost today already what are we even doing here? Yes we can make it I’m telling you - the teams above us are objective ass so much of the “math in undoable” stuff comes from thinking we need to hit 95 points. 90 might get in. 90 the math isn’t great but these teams are defying already low expectations! Surely, surely a concept we Sabres fans plenty of training in - - - Peguins have the same amount of points as us. Devils (losing) will have a mere 2 more Caps (lost) have 3 more Islanders have 4 more …if the Sabres win today, we are *two points* clear of ONLY looking up at WC2. Are people just refusing to look at the standings? “All these teams we need to pass.” We will have 20 games to gain 2 points (the amount for 1 win) if we secure the dub today. Would be 1 back of Wash and 2 back of the Islanders. We’d be 8 back of Tampa with a game in hand. We’d be 8 back of Detroit and play them 3 times
  12. That’s not true by points percentage. We’ve gained a fair bit on the 4 teams in between and a bit on Tampa too
  13. I absolutely agree. The math seems a tad wonky to me too. I get the “4 teams to leapfrog” thing but these guys are like 2-4 points up on us now. Coming into season we don’t say, “well, we are competing with 8 other teams for WC2, the odds of outplaying all 8 aren’t good.” If we are better we are better. It’s not exactly that situation with those teams right now but it’s close: they are only a couple points up and there’s 25% of a season left. can we real in Tampa or Detroit? Strictly possible
  14. We share a space in the Venn diagram. We absolutely can make it, and it’s absolutely a failure of a season if we don’t
  15. I love you buddy but I’m here. I’m Stern
  16. “No more building and waiting and hoping for someone from the outside or something in the future to save us. And this goes for the fans as much as the players. Expect to win. It’s time to be good again.” - - - You are the better poster, and know about Hockey more than me. I mean it. So, please, just tell me, and don’t mislead this time: when can I expect to win? You said to expect wins and I did it. Did you mean, “expect more wins in the second half than first?” ”it’s time to be good again in the second half of seasons?” help a brother out
  17. Also, I sort of resent the goal post moving, I’m sorry. It makes being around here a bit difficult. What did you say coming into the year? What did we all say? Progress was making the playoffs. That was the expectation. The BARE MINIMUM expectation. If you want to betray the focus of results to the level of what feels like a cop out, I just can’t do it. We aren’t going to sit here and say, “well, I guess this is what a good build looks like” because we get seduced by a strong finish. There’s zero perspective there: we KNEW that would be possible before the season started, NO ONE claimed that would be evidence of success. NO ONE called that shot! The theory of “is this actually the proper way to build?” falls apart with a simple question: Would you be satisfied with missing the playoffs next year, provided we finish much stronger than we start the season? of course not. *that was supposed to be this year, too.* If you want to change your thinking on that and say, no, I was wrong, playoffs didn’t need to be the expectation this year by the prism of whether the rebuild is coming along successfully, have at it. I’m good here. And I’ll continue rooting for the playoffs this season because making it wouldn’t just be “nice”, it’s the only thing that makes the season worth it It just makes me laugh. The argument for Adams taking so long was at least we improved year over year. We really gonna sit here and say, “well, as long as we are playing better at the end of seasons than we did at the beginning of seasons, it’s all good.” Where does it end? lol. You see we are just creating a situation where they can never fail because the expectation is basically nothing they can’t fudge manually. The logic is bad because a scenario where Adams willingly ices the youngest team every year where we struggle to amount to anything but get better as year goes on, before re-upping on youth the following year, and thus repeating the same cycle is apparently evidence of success. We could improve during the course of 10 straight seasons and never make the playoffs. Please, for the love of all things holy: call your shot. Have an argument. Stick with your argument. When are we supposed to make the playoffs? im actually asking. When is it ok to measure by actual results, if not this year I am actually asking. 10 years? Is it ok that we say, regardless of how strong we finish, we need to make the playoffs in 2030? What is the timeframe by which it would defy logic to suggest you can’t expect a team to amount to something every other team does? I am actually asking. We all agreed that was this year and now we want to do this whole song and dance again. If we don’t make the playoffs this year, we failed. I don’t need to run scared and hide from that expectation. I’m not gonna betray everything we talked about all offseason to make myself feel better. I can live with the failure if we call a spade a spade. I’m even willing to give KA another chance I’m not going to sit hear and eat sh*t and tell you it tastes good: how it’s supposed to taste. Have at it
  18. Well, no, it’s not what it looks like. The answer to your questions lies in the overall output of the team. The three seasons you detailed (after leaving out KA’s first) are not created equal in that, each or the first two left us in a better place overall than when we started. Those two seasons, Granato helped fix, and we improved overall. Regressing a bunch this season to start, and then battling back to the point we nonetheless still take a step back overall this year isn’t progress If Adams torpedoes the roster this summer and we start 0-41 and then 25-16 over the final half, that’s not progress for the rebuild: it’s just progress over the course of a solitary season. You can take a step back to take two steps forward, but that’s not what we’ve done this year so far. We took a step back, and might not even get back to where we finished last season we aren’t grading on a curve here: that’s a dearth of expectations, Buffalo only thing: this season if we finish with 90 points isn’t ok because we did it with a poor first half and good second half The proof it doesn’t translate is now in the pudding, in that case. Even if we did improve year over year, and took 5 years to make the playoffs: no, that’s definitively NOT what a “building the right way” looks like. I frankly don’t understand the question: 5 years is a demonstrably long time league relative to make the playoffs. Most teams don’t come close to that time frame. A situation where a team hasn’t made it in 4 seasons with the GM on the job where season 4 went backwards is not what we want to be seeing here tl;dr - “2nd half improvement” (I cannot believe this is still the lingo we are using (cursed development year jargon) is not close to as important as year over year improvement. Especially when your GM has been on the job 4 years and everyone else has already figured it out in the time we’ve been bad
  19. Guess I’m wrong then. I’ll avoid watching this one
  20. If they end up catching up on the same race track, the horse was always in the race. It would be revelatory
  21. If we don’t make the playoffs, it’s a huge fail. The expectation hasn’t changed. They don’t have an excuse to “run it back” if they miss. Those results aren’t close to good enough and the macro season result is still obviously what’s the most relevant, not when your distribution of wins was. But I think we can make it
×
×
  • Create New...