Jump to content

Contempt

Members
  • Posts

    5,179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Contempt

  1. Is it fair to say our Pekar never fully developed into the rock hard warrior we'd hoped for?
  2. It would be high comedy to see a player refuse to report over something like this.
  3. I don't know how I feel about this. If Vancouver is moving Demko you'd think they'd want a goalie back but I don't think Comrie moves anyone's needle. That means UPL, Levi, or Portillo. I dont think Portillo has much value right now at all so it comes down to UPL or Levi. If Vancouver is blowing it up, as they seem to be, Levi is more in their timeframe than Buffalo's who are ready to need a goalie today. So that makes this sort of trade a choice between UPL and Levi. Levi is a bag of magic beans that may or may not ever grow into anything. He's also short and the list of great, short, goalies in the modern NHL is very...short. UPL is starting to show his value but he's still very much unproven and not a given. Call him a sprouted magic bean. One that could root or just as easily wither. Making this trade would either give them Demko, Comrie and Anderson or Demko, UPL, Comrie and Anderson with another move or two to be made. The Sabres would probably prefer to move Comrie in this scenario but as I said, I don't think he jingles Vancouver's bells unless he's the throw in along with something else major. I also dont see them moving UPL for this year's version of Demko who would then need to immediately be much better than he has. Basically, I don't think this is a trade that gets made because I don't think it makes as much sense as the TV guys want it to make.
  4. Let's see what happens down the stretch. They just lost 3 straight and gave up 11 goals in the process. Are they starting to wear down?
  5. About 18 months ago I think one could have acquired Luke Schenn for a wooden nickel. Now Vancouver fancies a first round choice for him. That is hilarious and any GM who makes that trade needs to win the Cup this year. No excuses. Hence, he wont be a Sabre.
  6. Our goaltending would need to be white hot but yes, I could see a pathway to win that.
  7. Not until the Sabres are hoisting hardware while Rusty O'Brillopad hasn't yet.
  8. Yes, but Eichel's games played per season has always been one of the issues
  9. At this point, all I want is another defensive D-man. If they can make a hockey trade for Mitts I'm listening but I need to know what it's for. If they can make a hockey trade for Skinner I'm also listening because I want out from under that contract if possible and he's Robin, not Batman. I don't think either of those things will happen. Olofsson I'm neither here nor there about. I like his shot obviously and that will always have value to a team on a PP unit. I feel like he's not a guy we will be re-signing long term though so if there's a deal to be made involving him to make the team better and open a spot for one of the kids I'm ok with it. It may be that he just walks at the end of the day but I don't like that asset management. My issue with the deadline is IMO, making the playoffs will be huge for this team mentally and the experience everyone will gain from playing meaningful games through March and into April will be massive. This is why I'm not moving guys for strictly futures. If it's hockey deal that helps us now AND later then yeah let's do it. If it's just moving people to gather more picks or guys that won't be NHL ready for 2-3 years then I'm not interested. The only exception to that is Anderson and it's ONLY if Anderson wants to be moved. Even with that you wouldn't be doing it for what you're getting back, you're doing it for the lineup flexibility. KNowing that it's might be worthwhile to keep Anderson around as insurance. If Terry wants to spend some money to facilitate cap dumps for guys that we then send to Rochester on waivers in order to acquire something worthwhile then go for it. However, we've talked about that LOTS of times and it doesn't really ever seem to happen.
  10. Hong Kong Phooey I dunno, what's the dark reason that we need to assure you we won't cancel you for?
  11. Because nobody is impressed by the selfie you took at the sports bar?
  12. "Edmonton is considering trading McDavid - E4" 😂
  13. Then he made peace with it and rode the moose home.
  14. And more well endowed. He's also nicer to children and old ladies.
  15. But where will the boys gather to play 'Chel and COD? What will become of his couch? This team stinks at home and is good on the road. There is something different at home that's causing an issue. Is it the couch? Is it g/f drama? Is is Chippewa St ? Idk, but there's something.
  16. Well that's even dumber. Why do we need Erik Karlsson? At all?
  17. If Vegas wants to eat half his contact and give us something sure, I'll think about it. Otherwise why is it a good spot? Because we are almost the only place that could?
  18. None of the above. Idgaf about college football at all
  19. Cozens IS Horvat only younger and cheaper.
  20. From a source I trust Stetson Bennett is kind of a douche as well fwiw.
  21. I hate him,and Florida wouldn't trade him to us, but I'd love the ability to send Radko Gudas over the wall every now and again
  22. I want a defenseman with some hair on his chest and not a lot else.
×
×
  • Create New...