Jump to content

SABRES 0311

Members
  • Posts

    5,670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SABRES 0311

  1. I mean he’s not the worst DMan in the history of the NHL. He’s serviceable and cheap. Now if he is in the starting lineup next year I might be worried but for the rest of this year, whatever.
  2. Leftist violence occurred way before Trump. Also, the guy won the 2016 election and wasn’t even in office and here’s what happened. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37946231.amp As far as my mindset, I didn’t just read about ***** from decades past. I’ve dealt with some of the worst people in places where authoritarian control and use of murder to gain compliance exists. Acting like the U.S. is 1930s Germany and under the control of an actual nazi is the dumbest ****. Symbolic of the idea that loudest people are sometimes the wrong ones to listen to.
  3. I’m not ignorant of 1930s Germany or the BS they pulled. I’m also not ignorant of modern day liberals and their more recent BS. -Pretend Trump will start WW3 with NK because he’s calling KJU rocket man -MTG (who is an idiot) will incite a civil war -Tools keying Teslas -Let’s pretend leftist groups who use violence don’t exist but act like everyone we don’t like is a racist or nazi. -Let’s burn and loot cities then rename part of one CHAZ. Then cling to Jan 6 (also stupid) like it marginalizes said multi city violence.
  4. I labeled him that or are you bringing over emotional again? 😂 Been a minute since you used the word nazi. Slow day?
  5. No, I’m not. But it’s cute you think of an organization in such narrow terms.
  6. I’ll start with the second. F*** no would I be surprised if stupid s*** happened again. Like the left, there’s enough idiots on the right whose perception of reality is beyond stupid. I see the difference between Trump and previous admins. He talks a lot of s***. If you’re asking if I think he’s the only president who’s been accused of overstepping, no. I have a bigger concern for the populace than I do a guy who will be out of office in four years.
  7. No it’s not the opposite. Antifa uses threat of violence to try to intimidate people on sociopolitical issues. This is what I am talking about. What you said is about them is a total lie. But I’m supposed to believe you on what you think is a threat? Heres a comparison you can understand. Antifa is to the left what the goofball proud boys are to the right. Same but different. Both worthless.
  8. Antifa is the equivalent of the Nazi brown shirts. Then you have the corrupted BLM movement that started burning cities and leftist politicians who showed their solidarity. You guys didn’t seem to mind that but now there seems to be a nazi around every corner. Im sure that’s just a deflection, or irrelevant now, or just never happened.
  9. Irrelevant irrelevant irrelevant. And it’s not contradictory. The onus is on the administration to have the evidence/intelligence to support the act. Neither you, I, or the judge show a reason to do something the act does not require. The exception would be the organization is not sponsored by the country. If the judge brought that up I would probably be on board.
  10. You guys weren’t posting this weird doom stuff when the left tried to dehumanize Trump supporters with the deplorable label. I doubt the left got this emotional when Obama’s IRS targeted conservatives. When the modern day leftist brown shirts, Antifa showed up you guys tried to say they’re not an actual group. 😂
  11. Thats just it. The act does not require due process. https://www.nafsa.org/regulatory-information/alien-enemies-act-1798
  12. They were deported under the Alien Enemies Act. This requires little to no due process. The judge’s reasoning was to provide due process. What was his reason to require something the act does not? If the judge had said the application of the act is the issue because the country in question is not a state sponsor of the terrorist organization, that’s different. The onus is on the Trump administration and DHS. If even one person is innocent then they messed up. By that I mean verified proof. Not some emotional “Trump is a nazi” thing.
  13. The judge offered no proof anyone on the plane was not a member of the terrorist organization. People are actually in favor of bringing terrorists back into the U.S. and you’re saying I’m the one who doesn’t care about the constitution? 😂
  14. The organization they belong to is designated as a terrorist organization. Per an NPR report from March 16 2025: “Last year, the Biden administration labelledTren de Aragua as a transnational criminal organization, and in January, the U.S. government designated the Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization.” It was the Biden administration who labeled them as a terrorist organization. Trump slapped the transnational tag on them.
  15. From the article the reason the judge made his decision was due to potential impacts on non terrorists personnel. That is the dumbest reason I have ever heard for not deporting known members of a terrorist organization. IMO what people are missing is an understanding of what these kinds of people are like. Not race, religion, nationality, religion. I’m talking about mindset and capability. To support what this judge did is as stupid as the judge’s decision. So if the judge has demonstrated this level of poor judgement, why shouldn’t he be impeached?
  16. Not liking terrorists in the U.S. is folly? That’s a new one. Let me guess, terrorists are irrelevant. SMH
  17. I refuse to believe the reason for what the judge did is valid. Instead of removing terrorists he blocks it because of a broad what if. Absolutely stupid or corrupt.
  18. If a judge is that stupid they block removing terrorists then they should be impeached. People are mad the U.S. isn’t sharing intel with Ukraine but have such little faith in those same/similar organizations they came up with an excuse to keep bad guys in the U.S. If someone supports that kind of stupidity just so someone they don’t like takes a loss then they are supporting the bad guys over country. Remember four years ago people in here said supporting/voting for Trump is supporting bigotry and the like? It’s a two way street. If someone wants him to take a loss on this they are in favor of keeping terrorists in the U.S. Sucks doesn’t it?
  19. Wow. Letting terrorists into the country is irrelevant? 😂 Good to know where you stand. Im sure victims of terrorism and those fight against appreciate that. 🤡
  20. I guess trying to send them back to their home country is exactly what the nazis would do. The judge is a hero and is looking out for U.S. citizens by keeping members of a terrorist organization here. They’re just misunderstood I am sure.
  21. So bring members of a gang designated as a terrorist organization back to the U.S.? Seems dumb but ok.
×
×
  • Create New...