Jump to content

Weave

Members
  • Posts

    26,853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Weave

  1. License to ???
  2. If only Deluca were here.
  3. I have a hard time accepting team names that don’t have plural names. Singular names, State instead of city, HC? The end is upon us. Prepare.
  4. Caribou? That seems a stretch. Are there any caribou in Utah outside of farms raising them? Them’s a tundra species.
  5. I think it was Coco Brazil?
  6. I don’t see CBC scratched into that case anywhere.
  7. Had the post I replied to been written without the absolutes, as your was, I likely never would have chimed in at all. Although Wookie not acknowledging the continuum of players between McDavid and Dahlin probably would have triggered me. 😁
  8. More serious-er.
  9. You chose your words to describe the second group poorly then. “So exceptional “ certainly paints an image of nearly untouchable. 10 players out of a roster of 23 is nearly half.
  10. You basically put half of a never won anything roster on the protected list. Even Dahlin (and certainly Power) should be available for the right price. I’m not talking about a dream overpayment. I mean, for the right price noone should be off limits if you are really serious about winning.
  11. Thorny is right. This fanbase is not serious about winning.
  12. Wookie hacked Thorny’s account.
  13. You lost me at the bolded. That used to be true, but hasn’t been for a good decade, if not more. One side is demonstrably more active in that context than the other.
  14. That would explain a lack of announcement. No need to take any action.
  15. I bet a real close comparison fan-wise is Bills fans to Leafs fans.
  16. The response is always, show me the return first. Everything is in play. Always.
  17. I hate you for putting this in my head. Eichel timeline becomes Dahlin timeline becomes Celebrini timeline…..
  18. The league wouldn’t allow Buffalo to do it. I enter Tim Connolly as evidence.
  19. Perspective is always a good thing to have. Sabres have managed to do both. Truly unique.
  20. What I did was ask him to explain his justification for his statement that “the Amerks model is working” in the context of making Buffalo better. I’m not sure how you stretched that into some weird time travel expectation. Maybe try reading through your glasses instead of looking down your nose underneath them.
  21. I realize that context is hard, and that your preference and comfort zone is to throw shots at the fanbase. The discussion was in regards to evidence of how the Amerks are helping the Sabres. I asked for his metrics. Congrats. You appeared to find a metric in a Leafs blog telling their fanbase all is well in the world cuz the Marlies had an awesomse season last year. You certainly could have popped that into the conversation without your “I’m too good for this fanbase” crap.
  22. Lindy’s reputation is one that had guys playing to strengths. I wouldn’t be surprised if Skinner did well under Lindy.
  23. Sure. By what metric? It’s not by any measurement of organizational winning.
×
×
  • Create New...