Jump to content

thewookie1

Members
  • Posts

    8,415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thewookie1

  1. My guess would be it could be a masterful manner of tampering legally. If you request to trade for a UFA in a sign&trade you can talk to the player. He's said he won't do 8 years now so a trade isn't necessary.
  2. The Sabres don't swing for the fences; they play small ball. But play a very fine line style of small ball where sac flies are not allowed. Could it work, certainly; but it isn't exactly common.
  3. 2026 1st would have to have some protection Benson isn't regardless of trade You'd be looking at moving Byram for futures than turning those futures and a prospect to get Robertson effectively.
  4. Trade Byram for futures, take those future and a prospect and get Robertson
  5. Well we certainly have some of those if they are looking for prospects or Protected 1sts in 2026
  6. Well he's a fine prospect I guess; just more of the usual disappointment in Sabreland though
  7. Again, no interest; the Sabres only matter if they are in Buffalo
  8. Well it’d be a dumb trade to move 9 for a 33 year old forward whom is propped up by Crosby. Rakell, sure but Rust is a hard NO
  9. No thx on the sale of the team; private equity group would mean Houston Sabres
  10. I still think they'll make 1 more move
  11. Hate it for that very reason
  12. At work so I can't get the Twitter link.
  13. CBJ, CBS is a news network and Friedman's stupid attempt to change abbreviations
  14. I just don't Rust to block us from keeping Tuch or actually getting better. Plus I sure as hell wouldn't trade them Helenius
  15. I'd take 2 for Byram and 9 if they offered. Misa would be a NHL player this year on 28 of 32 teams
  16. I want nothing to do with Rust, he's literally rusty Peterka but now without his Crosby crutches to keep him upright
  17. Of course our division has to limitlessly get better year after year
  18. I think it would be akin to Byram & Quinn for Kyrou
  19. He was offered in a trade regarding Peterka; not necessarily 1 for 1
  20. 5x7.7mil would put it at compensation of a 1st, 2nd and 3rd So perhaps we need to view the return through that lens Would we rather have Kesserling + Doan or Utah's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd next year?
×
×
  • Create New...