Jump to content

7+6=13

Members
  • Posts

    2,595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 7+6=13

  1. I deleted that post. I didn't care for how I worded it. My apologies. You don't like to call names? It's literally the majority of your content.
  2. I have a right to tell you I think you're part of a group of people making SS a negative cauldron. Many don't love what you're doing. Never ever tell me I can't voice my opinion too. It's actually amazing that you're calling for a doubling down on your actions and that I'm to be silent. Another massive indicator of your totalitarian agenda to make SS only be about what you want it to be. Then you blame Terry, Kevyn and others for YOUR actions.
  3. This response is proof positive you're not capable of seeing what you're doing. You're a grouch and don't possess the necessary couth to stop ruining it for many others that doesn't agree with your nonsense. You just admitted you don't care that you're having a negative effect on SS with this mindless rant. So you've posted here nearly 1,500 times per year since 2020 about a team and owner you loathe and he's the idiot? He's stubborn? He's ignorant? He owes SS something? He should go away? Locate a mirror.
  4. I don't think you quite grasped the message of my post. The same 10 or so posters (guess), have hijacked SS and made it nearly unbearable. Take for example your post above. It's literally the same exact post that's been made dozens upon dozens of times. You seem to think it's an enlightened post but it's not. What it is, is boring. How many times do you think this has to be said? Here's what you don't get. I know many people that don't come here anymore because they can't stand the repetitive negative posts. I remember a time when I came here because there was so much hockey knowledge being discussed. I didn't grow up playing the game, except street hockey. So coming here helped me understand a sport I liked from afar but as I got older became my 2nd or 3rd favorite. TP didn't make SS the way it is. Hostile posters did. Every single thread, basically goes down the same exact roads.
  5. This is just a bad place to come anymore. Posters making stuff up with insinuations and no proof. Start filling in blanks with conjecture. Then other posters commenting on these made up things, as if they're true statements. Anyway. Just wanted to throw my thoughts in the ring. In the event it resonates with others that don't interrupt the tirades either .
  6. I see where we're passing each other, not that I necessarily disagree. I think he can get 7 - 7.5 now, even possibly from the Sabres. I thought we were talking about a path for him to get north of 9 mil. I think that's a serious challenge and I don't believe he's getting 72/8 like Chychrun. Not in this contract. Maybe he signs a 3 year deal, performs on a team as you suggest and his next, 27 year old contract is high end.
  7. I understand what you're saying but how's he going to get that opportunity? The only way I see it, is if he plays the final year of his contract and signs a one year deal somewhere where a team will allow him PP time to get these coveted points. That's not likely. Wanting a trade from the Sabres isn't going to do it either. They'll have to give up a good player to get him and they'll want a commitment to sign an extension shortly after the trade. Which will be based on his current point status. Maybe I'm missing something.
  8. This is an interesting take. So you think he wants north of 9 mil per? Do you think he could get that from a team willing to trade for him, with the said team having to likely give a good player back?
  9. Pretty much sums up my presence on SS.
  10. I agreed to ignore you and you offered that you would too. YOU broke the agreement, you hypocrite. Save your thumbs down and heed your own rhetoric.
  11. This doesn't make any sense. It's just another emotional rant.
  12. I mean, someone has to bring some, haha (few others). It's just not the low point, I don't get it. I understand the frustration, however it's gotten quite ridiculous.
  13. Wow what a game between Kings and Oilers.
  14. Definitely the low spending is a significant contributor but I just don't think we've had someone in FA we have the opportunity to pay and I think we're way done over paying. For me this may be the best team we've had since the drought. Id have to give that more thought, to say definitively. Yet we suck. The youth part is just something we just know is there and I don't think it's crazy bad, because I've wanted mostly all of them to play for the Sabres.
  15. Giving up? Absolutely not! I don't hate Pegula and my guess is he still wants to win. He tried the spending route, tanking route, fan approval route and then the patient route (probably mostly out of necessity). Nothing has worked but I'll give him credit for trying. He's paid multiple people to not work for him to move on, etc etc. I like a lot of our players and feel like we're better than our record. I'm a bit confused on why we suck. We've been making changes to this roster so much, it's hard for me to believe in this "roll it back" narrative. I want a goalie, two much different defenders and another forward with a two way game and toughness. I think we're close or could be with the right moves. I haven't felt that way in a while.
  16. I loved Sam as much as you did (well almost). Because he wasn't a highlight real, ultra skilled star, he was grossly underrated. He's a star now for sure by just doing what he does. I thought Quinn had a chance to be that type of player. I'm not good enough to see all the defensive issues with forwards, but it's painful hearing you say he's so bad, we can move him. I'm sure he'll get better but I suppose we can't have another player like him.
  17. I agree we don't like each other and I'm done with you insulting me. As in, don't do it again. I agree, let's avoid each other going forward.
  18. I get it, it's the owners fault. It's always their fault as the highest rank. The why is what's interesting to me and it's subjective. You say Terry is silent, others say he's meddling. Neither mean anything, at least to me. You couldn't know he's silent and neither could anyone that thinks he's meddling. "A lot of fingers are understandably polnted at the current feckless GM. My finger is pointed at the silent owner.". This actually means absolutely nothing. What imagination and hockey wisdom is involved here?
  19. Did you ever see him as being a player to engage physically? I had the feeling he was a Reinhart type of player. Not seeking physical engagement but maybe made up for it with tenacity and being willing to get in front of the net, things like that. I wonder if his offensive disappointed, which he must have felt that pressure, led to him going down a bad path. You don't see much optimism he can rebound?
  20. I think there's a difference betwen understanding things haven't worked and why they haven't. The why they haven't, IMO is a discussion because we don't have all the information to know.
  21. You always have to resort to name calling. I didn't say you said that about Boterill, didn't you see the question mark? It looks like this (?). It wasn't a statement, that would have ended with a period. You're so stuck on repeating your baseless hatred for Pegula, you can't engage in discussion. I won't comment on anything you post again. You're boring and I'm sick of your insults.
  22. So you wish they would have stayed with Boterill? I disagree, the youth movement was a need. You're also not following me as I said it didn't work. I suppose the difference between us is you pretend to know why.
×
×
  • Create New...