-
Posts
15,355 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ...
-
If I'm not mistaken, Gionta has a Cup ring, yes?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ugh. Antics.
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Eichel was dogging it after getting caught out there. Eh?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bailey, that was some compete right there. ...eh?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bigger than your mom's fat ass, bitch?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Shhhhhh....they're playing hockey.
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
We look good...for an AHL team. WHY IS THE NUMBER ONE BANNED?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Chad forgot how to play goalie. Speaking of, why is the number 1 not allowed as a player number?
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
"Don't beat yourself..." ~Rob Ray
- 523 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- San Jose
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
That must be rap. I get that.
-
We suck.
- 415 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- Anaheim
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rob Ray, wha?
- 415 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- Anaheim
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Haha, Kane is trolling the Duck's bench.
- 415 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- Anaheim
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Five and a game. That wasn't an accident with that stick.
- 415 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- Anaheim
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
No, he said "I fell in place 'cause dis here mutt had squatted out two sh#ts..."
- 415 replies
-
- game discussion thread
- Anaheim
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
For d4rk:
-
You're welcome to your opinion of the parent, but all I have read is people trying to tell you that your opinion is short-sighted. No one has tried to tell you you can't hold that opinion, and, to add, if someone on the internet did try and tell you can't have that opinion, what does that matter? Do you think the people opining on your opinion are trying to bitch-slap you because they think you're an annoying troll? Or do you think they perceive you and Josie as our internet brother and sister, couple-in-waiting, and are just trying to help you out, educate you a little? I'm telling you straight up that your opinion on the matter is flawed, because it lacks the experience necessary to really appreciate the situation. That's not a put-down, I'm saying that because I'm trying to pass along what I have learned in life. Before I was married and had kids, I would have had the exact same response as you, and now I see how, frankly, immature that response is. I think in this instance, really, the older, experienced crowd is trying to "straighten you out" in a respectful manner, and you handled it poorly IMHO. But, even the latter is understandable, because you simply have no idea...yet. When you have kids, especially that young, every waking moment is devoted to that child/those kids. Everything, every thought, every action. If there's something as innocuous as an open practice where you know you can take the kids, sit there and watch for a half-hour, and split when you want, you might take that opportunity thinking "what can go wrong?" With the "what can go wrong" approach, you have to be realistic. Something can go wrong at any time. What can go wrong walking your kids around the loop at Delaware Park? What can go wrong crossing Main Street at a red light in the University District during a weekday afternoon? How about taking a plane trip to Florida to visit your relatives? One can't live life afraid of the variables, what does that teach the kids? The very notion that these people shouldn't have been at the open practice plays into the helicopter parent mentality. Like the rest, I'm sharing my philosophy here, not trying to put you down.
-
Dude, your argument STARTED firmly against the parents, and now has evolved into some sort of social commentary on how society caters to kids. I don't find the arguments to be in the same ballpark. Social commentary on over-protection of children = okay, less to no flak for d4rk Criticizing the parents (especially when you don't have the full story) = lots of flak for d4rk from people who have actually had children So, what is it, exactly, are the parents still idiots for taking a kid to the open practice, or are we supposed to forget you went down that path and just happily philosophize over what may or may not be happening with society relative to protecting kids?
-
Dude, he's totally talking about the clones. There's nothing about clones in the rule book.
-
Good to see you again, buff, you should stick around a while.
-
Good, as in I think that's a good prediction. A very possible trade IMHO.
- 60 replies
-
- trade deadline
- trade
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
That's a good one, right there.
- 60 replies
-
- trade deadline
- trade
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Color me surprised the sexist police haven't invaded this conversation yet. Yup.
-
You're not the first PhD I know (well, you know) who likes the voluptuousness.