RochesterExpat

Agreed. He's not physical in the sense of big open ice hits but in the sense of "net front presence." If you watch the Team Sweden highlights from the WJC, he's pretty easy to spot (#22) because he's always either in the corner winning the puck or sitting in front the net. Unfortunately, in a lot of the WJC games, no one is really contesting him sitting in front of the net, so it's not exactly the best example, but the point is still made. The 2nd Swedish goal during the gold medal game against team USA is a particularly hilarious example. He helped retrieve the puck in the corner, saw the puck was moved to the point, and then went to the front of the net. He ends up tipping a shot wide, Sweden recovers, and the puck ends up at the opposite point where Wahlberg is still just standing there. That puck goes in. It's WJ hockey at its finest. You mentioned Brett Murray who is honestly a similar player (goes to the net), except Murray never developed NHL speed (among other attributes). Wahlberg, at the very least, has the speed to keep up with Östlund and Lekkerimaki. There's a lot to like about Wahlberg, but he's going to definitely need time to develop. Ideally, he ends up in Rochester for a few seasons where he gets plenty of PK time as well as playing the bumper spot on the power play. That will certainly help his development.

If by the "same spot" you meant we were 7 points out after 65 games as many others have been repeating, that sort of misses the fact we had multiple games in hand on everyone ahead of us. Right now every team in a wildcard spot ahead of us has games in hand on us.

I don't think he's quite there. Others are free to comment. To his credit, he played on Sweden's top line with Östlund and Lekkerimaki during the World Junior Championship, but it was more in a complimentary niche role and not because he was more talented than the 9 other rostered forwards. He does have some wheels though which allowed him to play the top line, but he was there for "grit" and not to be a highlight reel player. He looked good in the tournament although he was overshadowed by his linemates. He needs a year in North America (at a minimum) to really see what he offers.

This is from Byram's second goal last night and is a perfectly cherry picked small sample sized example to prove a couple of points about this team. For those of us with memories impaired from using alcohol as a coping mechanism for Buffalo sports fandom, the needed context is the puck was on the wall and Girgensons won the puck and played it back to Tage on the point. Byram is circled in red. The point here is there is absolutely no hesitation whatsoever by Byram. He's already moving to the net. Tuch (who is right behind him) and is usually one of the only players to reliably crash the net is only now turning to move. Girgs is going to cycle to replace Tage as Tage pinches in. Dahlin is actually moving backward at this point to pinch in for a rebound/pass when it becomes obvious Tage is going to the net with the puck. No one here is making a mistake or anything. It's simply to point out that Byram is quite literally a step ahead of everyone else in Black and Red. And that leads me to my next point: coaching. Byram is absolutely a talented hockey player and every scouting report talks about his hockey IQ and vision--just like most scouting reports for early 1st round talents. A D-man instinctively crashing the net in this situation isn't just raw talent. That's from playing in Colorado under Jared Bednar and his staff. That's from a coach who sets expectations with players and holds players accountable. Colorado is a good team in part because a lot of their goals come from players going to the net. And this goes back to tons of people on this board repeatedly talking about "adding grit" or whatever else. While I'm sure some posters still define "grit" as dropping the gloves, I'm of the younger crowd which considers "grit" as the forwards who are going to the boards to win the puck and then turning and going to the net. And it's not simply going to the net. It's staying there and battling with the D-man for position. It's screening the goalie. It's getting to the rebound and just being generally annoying for the other team. It's getting the "dirty" goals. Once again, to use cherry picked data, lets just look at the power play scoring differences between Colorado and Buffalo. It's pretty easy to figure out why the league figured out how to counter Buffalo's powerplay. Back to the point about going to the net: there's no question that Jeff Skinner has slumped again this season. Last season, he wasn't scoring pretty perimeter goals. He was just scoring goals because he was at next to zero distance from the goalie for a large percentage of his shots. He started out the season doing the same, but he's taken steps back and hasn't been crashing the net the same (this somewhat matches up to his and Tage's injuries earlier in the season which may play a part that we're not privy to). But that change in his behavior has been hugely impactful. Now, we can either write Jeff as a headcase, or we can question why the coaching staff has allowed this to go on as long as they have. And the issue extends beyond just Skinner and applies to the vast majority of the roster. Skinner is just the easiest target. Lastly, lets look at Byram's first goal. For context, Greenway passed the puck to Benson at the top of the circle, Cozens crashes the net, and Benson shoots a low shot that generates a very fast and high rebound. Once again, look at what Byram is doing. The live clip shows you just how quickly this happened. Byram didn't get that rebound by seeing where the puck was going and then moving to it. He was already moving to where he was coached to go and he was coached to go there for exactly this reason. He didn't stop skating when he got to the blue line. He just kept moving. The second takeaway from that clip is watching Dahlin see the rebound and start cycling back to retrieve... only to realize his D partner is competent and would cover it. So Dahlin ends up kind of just stopping and standing there for a second looking almost confused. It's honestly kind of funny to see. But that's the value that Byram is bringing to Buffalo. Dahlin isn't going to be expected to do everything on defense for 30 minutes a night anymore. If these trends continue and Dahlin and Byram continue to play well together, Dahlin is going to have the opportunity to really elevate his game even further. Before I step off my soap box, I want to circle back to an earlier point: a lot of this goes back to coaching. Byram looks like an electric player in part because he's been coached at an NHL level. He knows where he needs to be on the ice and he never stops moving. Not to pick on Benson in that second goal, but he shoots the puck and then just stands there. He looks like he's lost. That's the kind of thing that the coaching staff should address with him after the game so that it doesn't become a habit. But it's also the kind of thing I don't expect our coaching staff to follow up on. And to that note, the Colorado broadcast last night took an incidental shot at Buffalo's coaching when they said something akin to, "Mittelstadt has so much more room to grow and develop as he learns how to play at the NHL level under Bednar" and suggesting he was basically a "raw" talent that needed to be molded. This is a player with 341 NHL games played. He shouldn't be learning how to play at the NHL level at this point. The sad part is that I don't even disagree with the Colorado broadcasters. They're right. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. I will now pass my soap box on to the next poster.

I think everyone is overthinking this because everyone wants him to extend 7-8 years, but I fully expect him to get bridged into free agency on a lower AAV (7.5-8) for three years and it wouldn’t surprise me if GMKA and his agent already have a handshake deal in place that gets signed this summer. Like many, I’ve been vocal about GMKA being too conservative or taking too long to make decisions. I can’t imagine GMKA suddenly departing from that behavior and making a knee jerk trade without doing an absolutely excessive amount of due diligence. The trade was “leaked” 2-3 weeks before the deadline when Mitts was linked to Colorado and Byram was linked to Buffalo. I took that with a grain of salt like most trade news, but this wasn’t a quickly done trade by any means. The Sabres (and his agent) will dangle the expected cap increases of the next few years in front of him if he takes the free agency bridge deal. It’ll also be sold as 3 years of guaranteed money given his injury history—something he might not get in arbitration—and an opportunity to play with Dahlin on a top D pairing before hitting free agency. At the time the contract ends, Buffalo will move assets (i.e. Power/Sammy) to keep him if the value is there and it makes sense. Basically Buffalo wants to see if it’s a value add to Dahlin. If not, he’ll be a trade piece or he’ll just simply walk to free agency after having spent 4 seasons and change in Buffalo. As for the “kicking the can down the road” argument because we traded Mitts’ contract for Bo’s, I agree in principle, but it’s somewhat of a flawed comparison. Mitts was going to end up a very expensive 3C in the organization because GMKA already hitched his wagon to Cozens and Tage (we can debate this all day but it’s the situation nonetheless). Unloading Mitts for Byram filled a role (Dahlin’s partner) that makes more sense to spend cap on than overpaying for a 3C. There is a reason why Matthews/MacKinnon/McDavid in this league have (expensive) supporting players. How long did we go with Dahlin - Joki? Sammy has done fine with Dahlin—at least when healthy—but is anyone really happy with it? Fine isn’t good enough. Getting out of this endless cycle starts with getting the superstar Swede a serious partner.

Ticketmaster tracks transfers and can alert the ticket providers. I honestly think this is just trying to comply with the scalping/resale law of NY that went into effect in 2021. Enforcement appears to have started because of Taylor Swift funny enough. The legal definition the state of NY is using for 'resale' (Licensing of Ticket Resellers, Arts and Cultural Affairs Law, Article 25* Tickets to Places of Entertainment): 8. “Resale” means any sale of a ticket for entrance to a place of entertainment located within the boundaries of the state of New York other than a sale by the operator or the operator’s agent who is expressly authorized to make first sales of such tickets. Resale shall include sales by any means, including in person, or by means of telephone, mail, delivery service, facsimile, internet, email or other electronic means, where the venue for which the ticket grants admission is located in New York state. Except as provided in sections 25.11 and 25.27 of this article, the term “resale” shall not apply to any person, firm or corporation which purchases any tickets solely for their own use or the use of their invitees, employees and agents or which purchases tickets on behalf of others and resells such tickets to such invitees, employees and agents or others at or less than the established price. Similarly, the term “resale” shall not apply to any not-for-profit organization, or person acting on behalf of such not-for-profit organization, as long as any profit realized from ticket reselling is wholly dedicated to the purposes of such not-for- profit organization I think you're probably fine because you don't fit the legal definition posted above. Giving tickets away to family is certainly allowable. If you're selling at face value or less, you're also fine. It's basically to handle scalping.

I don’t want to see Dahlin traded so I don’t want him to get the C.

He’s not a left shot defenseman so I don’t see us going after him.

We get 4 points, right?

It’s the same reason I want Robinson back next year as a 13th forward.

Our defense and offense have swapped roles the last two games.

Not sure how many here regularly watch the Amerks, but Byram reminds me of Novikov between the speed and willingness to pinch. Weird comparison but now I can’t unsee it.

How bad is it that Byram’s willingness to just shoot the puck at the net is an improvement for this team?

Yeah so this is the part where the team shows maturity and rallies together to fight back… right? Surely they’re not just going to phone it in after going down 2 in the 1st.

I kind of like the idea of Skinner - Krebs - JJP if you’re trying to mix things up. The issue is how it leaves the other 3 lines…

I hate the term grit, but Buffalo does need to add players who are more aggressive pursuing pucks. They switched from a transition team to a dump and chase team and have the lowest successful puck retrieval rate in the entire league. You can't play dump and chase hockey if no one chases. Vegas made it to the Cup Final the first year off of offensive depth, exceptional defense, and exceptional goaltending. During the playoffs, MAF was the gamebreaker for that team. I guess one could argue they didn't win the cup, but they still made it further than the majority of the teams on your list.

Frankly, we need to bring in both types of players. We proved we have a lack of depth in scoring this year between injuries and slumps. We have four roster spots open next year as of right now: Mitts, VO, Girgs, and KO. Two of those need to be players who are relentless after pucks. The third needs to be able to score (ideally that third guy can play the 3C role at a more appropriate cap hit so we can replace Mittelstadt and not have to slot Krebs in there). The fourth should be a capable finisher as well (in my opinion) because the loss of Quinn really impacted this roster. Funny enough, from your post, Kulich is more of a dual threat (he actually goes to the boards) and he had his second ELC slide this year, so we get him for three years on his ELC starting next season. From a cap standpoint, he's worth keeping. It's the Rosen and Savoie players we should be moving. Even Östlund who I would give preference to keeping over both Rosen and Savoie should be on the block.

We've managed to lower the average age even further at this trade deadline and bring in two more left shot Defensemen. I'd say it's a success.

I agree with the first part, but Montreal media got excited a few weeks back at the possibility after it was leaked they inquired about him. The supposed offer beats that by a bit. But, again, rumor mill is about as trustworthy as a politician. Gen Z is soft because Millennials won too many trophies as kids because Generation X grew up after WW2 and never understood what it means to actually struggle in life. Or is that too much generalizing? For the record, the aforementioned Skinner is not Gen Z--he's a millennial. As is Olofsson and six others. As one would expect, notoriously soft player, Jordan Greenway, is Gen Z. Also, the biggest issue for Buffalo right now is scoring goals. It's why I think @GASabresIUFAN is on the right track with his keyboard GM thinking, even if I disagree in this particular instance. Players like Zegras are important pieces. Reality is, Buffalo needs to add both more players who drive to the net (the Greenway type) with players who are capable finishers and top tier playmakers (the Zegras type). The Sabres have tons of talent, but it's too concentrated. They need players who can step up when some players slump or are injured. We can't fill Jack Quinn's spot with Jordan Greenway and we can't fill Jordan Greenway's sport with Victor Olofsson. It's about depth and balance (sorry, been watching too much Food Network).

He's 23 in March. Not that it matters. Why would the Ducks want to trade him? If you were the Anaheim GM, you are looking at yet another rebuild and he's not out of the age band for being a key piece in that. I haven't heard that he is asking for a trade either. That suggests to me that Anaheim is only hearing offers because they think they're selling high. That leads me to the next point: the asking price. Have you seen the supposed ask? It's insane. There's no way he's worth 2 1st round picks, a 'top' prospect, and a 'young NHL player' in return. I like the idea on paper, but I don't like the idea when everything is taken into consideration. I'd rather take a flyer on the far less expensive Kaapo Kakko than give up a bunch of assets on Zegras. I realize we're asset strong, but we shouldn't spend them all on one player unless he's a bona fide gamebreaker--and Zegras isn't.

In fairness, neither does Granato.

You said you wanted to see Buffalo bring in someone with experience. It says a lot when they apparently found leadership and experience come in a 22 year old. And what that that says isn’t a positive for the management.

Hang the banner!

In fairness, of the current 25 man roster in Buffalo, Bowen Byram is 4th on the team in playoff experience.