Thorny

Sabres have anecdotally done a good job this year buying extra time before the PPs start

Derp

Peterka scores after Hughes falls?

JJ snipe

Will be able to view this one at least until the World’s series starts devils not being in red kinda sucks Woulda been great uniform matchup

First game of KO’s career at left wing? Haha - - - DeLuca .500 tonight?

I only like this show more over time. That’s one of my favourites actually, also the trivial pursuit episode moops 😂

He needs to be weeping by the end of the evening

That’s what I was wondering, if it works to our detriment considering you’d less likely see a coach attempt to match on the road, without last change I actually have no idea I’m just hypothesizing potential causes for the home away discrepancy

This thread is funny because… oh how the turn tables, things of that nature We often see conversation revolving around fans being chastised for not being happy enough about the wins we do manage to scrape together. “Shut up and be happy about what you get” the tone, sometimes. Questioning the realness of fans. This is sort of the inverse “look, maybe you aren’t angry enough about the losses.” It’s probably fair game in the name of balance, I’d say Perhaps that brings the board together: perhaps it illuminates the fact that no one in their right mind would be posting on the board the amount WE, all of us, do, if we didn’t, really, all want the same things deep down Perhaps the real wins are the friends we’ve made here along the way

What’s the line at? I’m not a gambler by nature, I’d be tempted to take the over depending on line if I WAS so inclined as Tage, like most good scorers, is very streaky. And I think he’s started one

It does for SJ

this is the accepted standard

Pay no attention to Buffalo’s placement: look at Vegas for jeepers sakes. But the extremity of SJ undoubtedly points to a horrid team

Does Granato match lines at home?

You mean Buffalohill?

I always like it when the defending champs start out really strong the next year. It validates their cup win even further and creates a compelling “champs till proven otherwise narrative” - such to the level that once they eventually get taken down in the playoffs it’s a bigger accomplishment for the team that does it, more dramatic and compelling: or they win again and the drama increases exponentially

There’s some other side of the coin irony to be found here

Poor Reinhardt. We never even learned his name

We’re on the road: Devils are doomed Devil, we’ll come on back if you ever wanna try again I done told you once you son of a bitch, we’re the best that's ever been

Yep, while obviously you strive for better than average, average is good enough that I won’t care much for it as a talking point if we make the playoffs agree it’s been ok so far, and really it’s too early to proclaim any judgment on this season’s results where that aspect is concerned. or really, any aspect

They gotta keep up these old school commercials, so good

21 year olds very rarely play 50. If that was the betting plan, it was a substantial risk The reason it was so risky is because of compound risk: there were any number of reasons why it’s difficult for a goalie that age to do it - and the injury concern doesn’t disappear. Like just in general, any goalie looking to get to 50 is going to have to contend with that hurdle. (It’s a questionable bet to make to the tune of not rostering competent backups, regardless of a goalies age) We don’t get to dismiss away the one thing that happened because it only had, I dunno, a 20% chance of happening- it was always that several unlikely bets were being placed at once: 1 coming up Bingo is exactly the point- 1 finding it’s way through was likely because of how many pitfalls there were. They were dodging in an asteroid field. And that’s precisely the point: it wasn’t the odds of any one potential shortcoming, it was the field. just by hypothetical: if this was a season ending injury, because this ONE PITFALL was unlikely in a vacuum, does that now prove the strategy sound? The specific asteroid that hits you wasn’t ever likely to do so: but that doesn’t change the fact you were likely to get dinged. It would be a logical fallacy to dismiss this as unlucky or chance. no matter what happens, it will have always been a risky proposition to bet on Levi playing 50, and that is even *further* compounded by their/our clear lack of confidence in the backups plain and simple: the only thing that can save Adams on this front is the results. There are *no hindsight outs on this*. that’s what the above explanation means. They made a risky bet on Levi to be the starter. It was wrong, or it was right, based on the results he delivers. the goaltending will be good this year, or bad this year. Or somewhere in between. Adams is amendable to those results: that is my only point.

It’s not that I don’t care, it’s that one thing should obviously be the priority over the other