Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    39,192
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. It goes back to one bad decision Terry made that no one could reasonably have saved us from since - and I ask you, can we really still hold a solitary decision he made a decade ago against him? People make mistakes.
  2. I can only argue under the prism of the consensus: be it for, or against I only care about internal logical consistency. We can operate under the idea that we’ve needed near perfection since the tank to right the ship, but then sentiment should reflect that
  3. We are 3 points back of WC2, but the Leafs have 2 games in hand so it’s more like ~5 points. 5 points out, with a further 3 teams sandwiched in between. It’s…not ideal. We aren’t at ā€œmust winā€ yet but realistically, kinda? The chances of us having a *good* chance are quickly eroding Can’t afford to stack non-wins anymore
  4. Oh come on
  5. šŸ‘€
  6. Bills got kinda screwed there
  7. They beat themselves a lot eh They might just feed the Eagles narrative. Sorry I just don’t think they are that good
  8. LOL If you are going to encroach..
  9. He’s gotta catch that
  10. Eagles are not quite what their record says they are and they are missing Johnson. Bills of a couple years ago roll here; I think this game is still there for the taking
  11. Remember when McCabe plastered Laine He’s a piece of sh*t So I should stop fantasizing about the playoffs?
  12. No idea why the OP is getting torched. He’s been statistically bad He’s not THE problem (why do people always want to pigeonhole the ā€œproblemā€ onto one thing? It never works like that), but he’s a symptom: a symptom of the type of aggressiveness the GM shows in addressing the roster if you just assemble a bunch of guys that ā€œaren’t the problemā€ you still haven’t rostered the guys you needed who could be ā€œpart of the fixā€
  13. It’s true, even people giving Levi the benefit of the doubt suggested a solid #2 was very important. We find ourselves in that predicted spot, missing a solid second guy, even if the first guy ended up being someone else (6k instead of Levi) ā€œWho was even available?!ā€ ā€œWhat good teams even were there?!!ā€ šŸ˜‚
  14. They should absolutely, positively trade the pick. Too much of a good thing to a certainty This is what I was kinda getting at in the ā€œlowest pointā€ thread. Regardless of how we define it for the team, it certainly seems so for the fans. We are starved to simply make the playoffs
  15. I prefer just looking at last season’s pace vs this season's. It’s not a golf course, improving by 2 points over a poor start from last year doesn’t mean we are in better shape than last year, more reflective is how the pace has downturned since they finished last season You hope that carries over + improvement not that you more less revert back to a stage pre-several stages of development. What would be the point of having a development year last year if it didn’t carry over - that’s the entire point
  16. He’s referring to: ā€œIf we only had Quinn, we’d be ok. Curses, we’ve been screwed again - there’s just nothing poor Kevyn Adams could have done.ā€ It’s an incredibly compelling correlation right now
  17. Hockey players don’t individually have a very high WAR and if a second year player somehow did, all the more reason KA should have replaced him when he had ample time and all the more reason this could have been avoided by a GM actually playing chess. Hell I’d settle for checkers. He just needs to actually play.
  18. ā€˜Zactly. We have plenty of flexibility (more than most teams), a .500 base and plenty of tools to make it happen: we simply need the GM to wield them
  19. The offseason was objectively bare bones from Adams
  20. Best moments by far of following (the heart of the reason I watch) is watching the 06 and 07 runs when I was near that age W/my Dad
×
×
  • Create New...