Jump to content

JujuFish

Members
  • Posts

    4,321
  • Joined

Everything posted by JujuFish

  1. There are AHL players with more cups than McDavid. Your point?
  2. Every time I see Connor McDavid, I am reminded about how we had to settle for Eichel.
  3. I really wanted the crowd to not boo because, unlike the Canadians regarding the USA, we have no reason to be upset with Canada.
  4. You seem to think you're making a point here, but you're not. You're proposing we strong-arm an ally rather than an enemy. There is no logical reason for it, unless you're a simp for the enemy. My "apparent definition" has nothing to do with the US and China. Please connect those dots for me, because I'm here on earth, not in space cadet territory. Who, exactly, did China invade that we provided military aid to? What "trade agreement" am I trying to defend that I should be against? And apparently you don't understand how to address points on a message board. You quote the part that is relevant, rather than the entire mess of a post.
  5. Oh, so we didn't get our allies to pay us for the money we spent on World War II? We got them from the aggressor nation instead? And you want to get reparations from Ukraine, not Russia? And you say you're not simping for Russia? Huh, odd. Could have fooled me.
  6. Remind me again, who paid reparations after World War II? Was it our allies? And we now have Trump blaming Ukraine for the war. As if it couldn't be any more obvious that he is completely corrupt and under Putin's thumb. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-ukraine-should-never-have-started-it-remarks-war-russia-rcna192710
  7. It's so amusing seeing conservatives simp for Putin.
  8. After seeing it was 4-0 with under 10 to go, my hopes of Sweden squeaking into the finals ended, but dang Finland almost forced OT.
  9. If the Biden/Harris administration was so bad, why did less than half the voters pick Trump?
  10. You don't see a problem with strong-arming resources from Ukraine when they're being invaded by Russia? Did you forget that Trump was impeached withholding military aid from Ukraine to try getting Zelenskyy to dig up dirt on Biden and take the blame for Russian election interference? The US is a big reason Ukraine's even in this position right now.
  11. I'm guessing someone told Trump that the US will run out of oil in 15 years at the rate we're drilling. On a totally unrelated note, I've been playing the new Indiana Jones game, and it's kinda nice beating the snot out of a bunch of Nazis.
  12. By the way, this will be the 6th season the Bills play both Super Bowl teams.
  13. Highly disappointed with the outcome. Screw Philly. C'est la vie.
  14. I used to think anyone would trade their MVP for a Super Bowl. Cam Newton proved me wrong in that one.
  15. Happy for him. After finishing 5th in MVP voting last season when he should have been 1st or 2nd, to being named the most overrated player in the league this offseason, to winning the MVP this season. It's nice to see him get some recognition, especially since you need awards like that for the Hall of Fame. He becomes just the third QB to ever win MVP without also winning 1st team All Pro, after Elway (who beat out Montana) and McNair (who shared with Peyton). Next stop: Super Bowl, pretty, pretty, pretty please.
  16. For my big three (Sabres, Bills, Guardians), 0 in my lifetime.
  17. At this point, forcing a punt would be as exciting as a turnover.
  18. Okay, the lead. Let's go, Buffalo!
  19. Tomorrow will be the 4th time (1966, 1993, 2020) the Bills and Chiefs are playing each other in the AFC/AFL Championship game. That will make it the second most common conference championship match in NFL history, behind 6 meetings between the Cowboys and 49ers. The Chiefs are 2-1 in the previous 3 matches, including 1966 for the right to play (lose?) in the first Super Bowl.
  20. On January 1, 1967, the Chiefs came into War Memorial Stadium and stopped the Bills' quest to threepeat as AFL champions. 58 years and 25 days later, the Bills will go into Arrowhead and exact poetic justice. Let's go, Buffalo!
  21. So you think the Bills would have been more aggressive had the Ravens tied the game? No? Then come up with a real argument.
  22. If Milano doesn't make a huge play on the first 2PC, then the second TD would have been a PAT for the lead, forcing Buffalo to have to go down the field to win. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. If the Bills had done the obvious tush push (or two) on 3rd and goal from the 2, then this wouldn't have been an issue because they'd have 31 points instead at the end (or 30 with a shanked PAT), in which case the Ravens would have been forced to onside kick regardless. The Bills were taking shots downfield in addition to establishing the run to keep the defense honest in the first half and came out of it with 21 points. In the second, they only did short passes literally the entire time, which allowed the Ravens D to tighten and cause Buffalo to score 6 points and making it a game. Yes, yes it did almost cost them.
  23. You say right call, I say nearly cost them everything.
  24. I really hope we don't get so conservative on both sides of the ball against KC like we did in the second half against Baltimore.
×
×
  • Create New...