Jump to content

matter2003

Members
  • Posts

    4,853
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by matter2003

  1. 1 hour ago, JoeSchmoe said:

    I was thinking of bringing the family out to take in some college sports. My son is pushing to hopefully play college baseball somewhere. My daughter just loves a good party.

    I used to go to a few games a year at the Carrier Dome back when my friend had a full scholarship for rowing (basketball, football, lacrosse). It was awesome! The atmosphere was always jacked right up.

    I figure taking in some sports and taking in the college atmosphere (even if it's not his own sport) would be a great motivator for my son. My wife and daughter have always wanted to experience the college thing.

    What's the atmosphere like at the Big 4 college basketball games around Buffalo? I know the schools and gyms are small, but if the crowd is really into it, it could still be fun. My son actually likes the idea of getting into a school like Canisius where he can be around fellow Sabres and Bills fans, and not be too far from home.

    Is Syracuse still fun given they're not the same team they used to be? 

    Any other suggestions?

    Eh...UB was getting decent when the team was going to the NCAA Tournament under Hurley and then Oats but has kinda gone back to nobody caring anymore...

  2. 31 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

    How exactly does sitting around not playing for a few weeks as an 18 year old help his development?   

    Juniors has never ruined a prospect... forcing them into action too early in their career has... countless times. 

    Juniors may not help them much either if they are already well above that level. 

  3. UPL gonna be up for at least the next few weeks.  I'm not the biggest UPL supporter, but he has played mostly solid and at times spectacular.  Rebound control seems to be much better as well.  Pucks seem to be sticking to him far more than normal.

  4. 5 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

    That’s a tad overblown. 
     

    Essentially if you only have so much time to teach and train; you are forced to budget that time accordingly. Their offensive play was likely greatly improved by the coaching focus. At some point it likely became more beneficial to keep going down that path and just try and out score your problems than attempting anything major mid season. 
     

    This year they already have a solid grasp on the offense and thus is likely less focused on. The defense now takes center stage on the curriculum. Since most of the team is the same; many of the lessons from last year can be built directly off of. 
     

    In the end my guess is by the time they had solidified a great offensive attack, the step back required to help the defensive play would have imploded the season. So they tweaked things and patched stuff as best they could and very nearly out scored their issues into the playoffs.

    Agreed...the goal last year was to have the young players realize they had high-end offensive NHL talent and get them to be confident in that.  Because under Kreuger they got beat down into not believing in themselves...take Dahlin for example...dude was a shell of himself.

    So his first goal was to get them to believe in themselves again and let them go play and score.  And score they did.  Now that they know they can go do that, the goal is to get them to play more defensively and teach them how to make sure they aren't giving up as many chances as they are creating. And working on the PK.  Sometimes trying to work on everything at once ends up really being not working on anything because the focus is too scattered and not enough time is spent on any one thing.

    In terms of this teams psyche, it had to be that way because Kreuger had beaten them down so badly.  I mean he had the youngest roster in the NHL last year and it got even younger this year.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. Made it look dicey and like we are holding on by the seat of our pants but they are remarkably good at closing games out when they have leads after 2 periods.  Still have not lost in regulation going back to the start of last year.  They are 30-0-4 during that time when leading after 2.

    Yes, it looks dicey and like they are going to allow the other team to win, but it almost never actually happens.  We don't have to like the way it looks but it's hard to argue with the end result.

    • Agree 2
  6. 27 minutes ago, French Collection said:

    If TNT, Tuch and Cozens crash the net that is some serious beef for teams to deal with. Skinner can sift in and get loose pucks.

    I’m not saying they use a net front guy all of the time but once in a while to change it up.

    They could inject this system every once in a while to screw with other teams’ PK. If it becomes successful then use it more. Mitts might be a guy to do this on PP2. Benson has some clips from the WHL where he operates well from behind the net.

    Gretzky probably got a few hundred points from that location. If you install a player with the threat of a Michigan goal that adds another layer.

    Another "Sneaky B" like Briere?  He was so good from back there...

  7. 16 minutes ago, MattPie said:

    If you look at the schedule, they play almost no Monday (1), Tuesday (0), or Thursday (2) games all season. Lots of Wed, Fri, Sat. A few Sunday (4) in March and April. I'd guess almost always on the same 3 days of the week makes it easier for people to find the games and watch. But it means they're often playing 3 games in 4 nights, with a 3 day break after.

    I'm going to assume this is requested by teams to aid with attendance?

×
×
  • Create New...