Andrew Amerk

So.... They are suggesting that you need a LOT of coffee to watch the games?

Wow.

Was this their April Fools joke?

Miller gets that elusive shutout. Very nice shoot out goal by Oshie.

So, don't pay good money.

I fully expect to be blown out by Nobody. He's had a dominant season.

That would be me. Didn't expect that- you were winning all week. Losing Malkin really hurt my team.

Lucic has nowhere near the skill level that Neely had.

You need to see the video of Lucic crying outside of the bar in Vancouver after someone punched him a few times. Sheer hilarity.

The bar is the best place to watch this roster.

Thank you for everything that you did for this region. RIP, RW Jr

On each side of the mask are two kids playing hockey outside and wearing Amerks sweaters. They're his cousins (Jeff Hackett's sons), Montana and Kurtis.

That broadcast was unbearable.

Two locco'd out...

Ditto

Proof that not many players have a nice signature anymore.

Point is, we already have that piece.

You left out Conacher. Imposing, indeed.

Yeah, cuz getting Hall, Noogie, and Yak has really helped lure players to Edmonton.

I agree that Jesse really seemed to get tossed aside after Hank was killed.

Seems pretty generic from the one photo. Where is the personality?

I just thought when I heard "inspired by the old CuJo mask" that it meant some mixture of Cujo from CuJo's mask and that bulldog that used to be on the back of Miller's mask.

”Last season we couldn't win at home and we were losing on the road. My failure was that I couldn't think of any place else to play.” - Harry Neale

Andrew Amerk, on 20 March 2014 - 02:44 PM, said: TP doesn't have to do anything for the fans, if he doesn't want to. Strictly speaking, this is true. Do you think it's a good idea that he carry on that way? Do you think he is carrying on that way? -I don't think TP has any idea at this point what to do. He has been grasping at different straws ever since he bought the team. Andrew Amerk, on 20 March 2014 - 02:44 PM, said: It's his team and his money. Fair enough. Does that mean you are resigned to his doing anything he damn well pleases with the franchise? Is there a limit to your ability to tolerate what he might do? -I tolerated what Golisano did with the team. Whoever owns the team, they can do whatever they want. So, yes, I am resigned to that. I do not own the Buffalo Sabres, and I have no say over what they do. Complaining on a message board does not have influence over any decision Terrance Pegula makes. Andrew Amerk, on 20 March 2014 - 02:44 PM, said: Being a die-hard fan doesn't make you a decision maker for the team Is anyone on this internet message board suggesting that it does? (I'll answer that one: No.) -In a way, you implied this when you said "it's OUR team too" Andrew Amerk, on 20 March 2014 - 02:44 PM, said: and it doesn't obligate an owner to cater to the fan base. Let me understand: the cares of die-hard fans do no obligate an owner to cater to them (the die-hard fans). That's probably fair. The owner is never obliged to cater to the team's fans. At times, it might make business sense for him to do so, but certainly there's no obligation to do so. -Not sure where you were going with this one, since you are saying you agree with me. Owners do not owe us anything, and do not need to do anything the fans want. If you need a shining example, see Pocklington and Gretzky.

So, is this better than Breaking Bad? This thread has many more pages.