LGR4GM

Monken firmly believes in half time adjustments.

I could see us do almost nothing at the deadline.

No. He's only ever mentioned because there's a perception around here and this place runs on rumors and fake news. Stop hiring first time coaches, period. When he stops acting like a child and actually tries to make the playoffs as opposed to just create good vibes.

If they hire Peca they are idiots.

Meh, the season is over. They won't fire Granato until the postseason anyways and then they'll have a bigger list of candidates.

Never had my opinion of a coach change so quickly. I'd like to thank Alex Tuch for the Tampa win. His weak, awful, lazy, lackadaisical, and otherwise piss poor efforts on the point for that pp cost us the game.

You are familiar with sh% then. For example if TNT has a sh% of 15 that means on every 100 shots he takes we expect him to get 15 goals. Sh% is a function of Goals/Shots. For GSAx (Goals Saved Above Expected) instead of applying sh% to a player, it gets applied to type of shot + location on ice where shot is taken. Instead of TNT having a sh% of 15, Wrist Shot from the Right Circle has a Sh% of say 10%. That is every wrister from that spot on the ice across the league. You then take the decimal for that (0.1) and over the course of a game, you add that up. So if there are 10 wrist shots taken from the right circle, that would be 10x0.1 and get you 1 goal. If your goalie saves all those shots, they would have 1 goal saved above expected because we expected 1 goal out of those 10 shots. Basically you are replacing a players sh% with a % that is (Type of Shot + Location) and then using the decimal point to cumulatively count up the value of those shots. League wide shots on average shots are usually worth like 0.1 goals per shot taken (roughly) so over the course of a game where a team shoots 30 times, you end up with 3 goals on average. If your goalie allows fewer than 3 goals, that gets subtracted so they saved say 1goal above expected. I am using simple math here because usually you see an GSAx at like 3.27 or something like that. Hope that helps. Just think of Shot Type + Location as a player and apply sh% to that, then add that up over the course of a game. There are more complicated GSAx formulas but they all basically have this underlying them. Some take into account individual players taking the shot or shot speed, or pre shot movement etc... but they still look at Location and Shot Type.

No he didn't. This thread is based on nothing. Literally nothing.

There's a Czechia and Slovakia Sabres fan group that has been here for a week and the Sabres have done a bunch of stuff with/for them. They've been very fun at games if anyone has seen them.

UPL

Ftr, the dumbest thing I've said here was that Zemgus was as good as ROR, and I was very very wrong. Shootout to @TrueBlueGED our long lost friend for being right.

I would agree that he hasn't been very good. I just think he's still giving you more than Bryson but maybe not. Bryson hasn't played so he could surprise us.

Sorry MVP I lied. Hadn't seen this post from Johninminn yet. I had my cat, Alfonso, read it to me.

Well I can't read so, idk what you want from me.

Zemgus, loving it.

No, I have never read any of my own posts. Didn't know one could do that. Thank you for your wisdom and bravery.

This is the dumbest ***** post I've ever read on this board.

I was trying to figure out if hell froze over with how cold and snowy it's been, but the Sabres still don't go to the slot so... nope.

Or Cozens is injured and Mitts is already the teams 2nd line if not 1st line center... Or what you said.

Thumb? Think you mean boot. Stop, you are absolutely talking politics. NBC shouldn't have edited the clip the way they did. We can all move on.

Yup, totally stupid at this point.

Hearing Rick hurt a little. I remember where I was and who I was with when the goal was scored.