nfreeman

That seems pretty GD dysfunctional. Eichel and Lehner -- together again! It's magical!

This is fair. Grubauer got 6 years x $5.9MM after splitting the #1 job for a few years, and of course Ullmark got 4 years x $5MM with no more than 37 starts in any season, but you are probably right that 6 or 7 years isn't likely for Husso. Even so, I doubt KA gives a 4-year deal to a FA goalie.

I don't think Husso is realistic. He doesn't turn 28 until February and will be one of the top UFA goalies available. He's going to want a 6- or 7-year deal. KA isn't going to give that kind of term to Husso or any other goalie for that matter. I think KA wants to see what he's got in the 3 young goalies and isn't going to commit starter money for more than 3 years to anyone.

I agree with all of this but I think the highest FLA can pick is #27, and that's only if Colorado passes them for #1 overall in the NHL standings. Since they are, in this scenario, a division winner not making the conference finals, they are in slot 27 (if CO passes them in the overall standings) or 28 (if Fla. finishes #1 overall).

This is fair, and I agree that it would make sense to trade him as part of a package for a proven, good, young RHD. I just don't think they'll move on from Bryson without a good, proven NHL defenseman to replace him.

I don't agree with this at all. At least 1 more NHL season will pass before Johnson signs. Even if the Sabres manage to keep him, he'll almost certainly need at least 1 year in the A -- so at least 2 NHL seasons will elapse before the Sabres will know whether Johnson can handle a regular NHL role. Meanwhile, Bryson is a guy who has already shown that he can do so, and will presumably improve with more experience over the next 2 seasons while we see what Johnson can do.

I too think it would be nuts to trade Krebs or Mitts unless it is part of a package for a no-BS really good young player coming back -- which seems pretty unlikely. And I say that as a longtime Mitts skeptic. He's shown enough post-RK last year and post-injury-return this year that I want to see what he looks like with a full offseason of conditioning and a full season of playing. I'm far from certain that he'll be a good NHL forward, but he might be, and there's a non-negligible chance that he'll develop into a good top-6 forward. The same is true of Krebs IMHO. He's fast, he's skilled, he has a great attitude, he seems to have good hockey IQ and he's just starting out in his career. That's not the kind of guy you trade for just a decent vet goalie or defenseman. The Sabres are finally in a position where they have a bunch of young, talented forwards. Not all of them are going to blossom into legit NHL top-6 or top-9 guys, but we don't know which are and which aren't yet, and there is no reason to rush the decisions. I also think KA feels more or less the same way, so I would be pretty surprised if either of them is traded.

Well, I think from Vegas' perspective trading for Eichel was a hockey move, not an entertainment move, although the Q factor was a nice bonus. But I think they made the trade because they thought, justifiably based on pre-injury Eichel, that they were getting a 25-year-old superstar who is under contract for a while and who had maxed out on wasting his career with a dysfunctional franchise -- and acquiring a guy like that is supposed to make your team better. The problem is that Eichel is not where he was pre-injury. I watched parts of the game last night and he doesn't look, to me anyway, anywhere near as fast or as powerful as he was pre-injury. Maybe he gets back to that level after an off-season of conditioning, and if he does then the trade will look much better for Vegas, but maybe he doesn't.

I'm quite excited and as I said in another thread if they bring in a real goalie this summer I am going to be making all kinds of silly predictions. But I think both things can be true -- the Sabres can be greatly improved AND their opponents can be less focused and/or intense than they are against, say, the top 10 teams in the NHL standings. Not to mention the fact that no one in the EC has needed to play with any desperation to make the playoffs for pretty much the entire time the Sabres have been playing well. Next fall, if the Sabres are, say, 15-8 at Thanksgiving and in 2nd place in their division, they'll get everyone's A game. I think at that point they'll be able to handle it, but I also think it will be a very different environment from what they're facing now. YMMV, of course.

I am generally unimpressed with Anson but as I have said before, I agree with him on this — the Sabres aren’t getting the opponents’ A games most nights. It’s worth noting that Carter played 10 years in the NHL and probably has a good sense about how the players feel about games like this one.

Why does Bjork keep getting starts? He’s been completely useless.

I would agree with this if he’d gotten them to the playoffs, or even close, but again — they missed the playoffs by a mile in his first year and then did worse in his 2nd year. I don’t see an incredible accomplishment or really any accomplishment at all.

80 pts is still a solid 16 or so (more this year) out of the playoffs. DDB was the best coach since Lindy until DM came along, but that’s a tallest midget award if there ever was one. DDB got canned in April 2017 and hasn’t gotten another HC job since then.

OK, so tonight we have: Seattle at Dallas — this is the big one, as Dallas is 2 points ahead of Vegas and each team has 4 games left Vancouver at Calgary — Vancouver also has 4 games left and is 2 pts behind Vegas Anaheim at LA

From the Athletic: "The Flower" played 961 games for the Habs, recording a franchise-best 1,246 points. … Lafleur was born on Sept. 20, 1951 in Thurso, Quebec and was taken with the No. 1 pick by the Canadiens in the 1971 NHL Draft. He won Cups with the Canadiens in 1973, 1976, 1977, 1978 and 1979 and won the Conn Smythe Trophy in the Canadiens’ 1977 Cup win. He led the NHL in scoring three straight seasons from 1975-76 through 1977-78 and won the Hart Trophy in 1976-77 and 1977-78. From 1974-75 through 1979-80 he scored 50 or more goals including an NHL-leading 60 in 1977-78.

I am legit looking forward to each game at this point, which is pretty amazing given how buried in the standings they are. I will continue to reserve judgment until the games and standings matter, which hasn’t been the case in the last 7 weeks. But I don’t think the team spirit and fast, exciting play they’ve been showing is a mirage either. It’s also very reasonable to be excited about Power and Quinn next season, and possibly JJP too. And if they bring in a real goalie and a solid defenseman this summer? I am going to make all kinds of outlandish predictions for next season. Go Sabres.

It was a skinny guy named Wayne.

RIP. He was a superstar and a worthy contemporary of Perreault.

We'll never know, but the real problem with the ROR trade may have been that it was simply unnecessary. The trade occurred in the summer of 2018, which was the summer after JB's 1st year as GM and Howie's 1st year as coach. That year was a disaster, as the team, which was not tanking, nevertheless finished DFL. My guess is that JB, like his successor KA, determined that the team's culture was rotten and the solution was to remove ROR. Having made that decision, JB made the best deal he could for ROR, likely subject to the crippling condition imposed by TP that the acquiror needed to pay ROR's $7.5MM bonus, because TP wasn't going to do so. But maybe removing ROR -- who was a very good 200-foot player, a legit #1C or #2C and accordingly a precious NHL commodity -- wasn't needed. Maybe the right combination of coaching and other personnel moves could've fixed the room. The same summer ROR was traded, Barry Trotz, who had just won a Cup with the Caps, became available and was immediately snapped up by the Isles, who immediately improved from Sabres-level joke franchise to solid playoff team. Meanwhile, it became clear the following year, Howie's 2nd and last year as HC, that he was in way over his head as a HC. Also that summer, JB decided to let Lehner, an RFA, leave the Sabres without offering him a contract or getting anything in trade for him. He signed with the Isles and immediately had a career year, with a .930 SV%. Meanwhile, JB signed Carter Hutton, who may have been the worst goalie in Sabres history. Maybe if JB had kept ROR, given up on Howie and brought in Trotz, a better goalie and one or 2 other good-character pieces, the Sabres could've made the same jump the Isles made. Again, we'll never know.

1) Team MVP -- TT by a nose over Dahlin 2) Rookie of the Year -- Samuelsson 3) Comeback Player of the Year -- Skinner by a nose over KO 4) Unsung Hero (player who doesn’t get enough credit) -- Jokiharju, who has enabled both Dahlin and Power to excel 5) Top Forward -- TT 6) Team Norris -- Dahlin 7) Team Vezina -- Anderson Edit 8.) Most improved player. (I knew I was forgetting something). -- TT 9) Team Selke -- Nobody has really earned this IMHO. TT and Tuch have been pretty decent on the PK, so maybe one of them? 10) Peca Leadership Award -- KO by a nose over Tuch 11) Ramsey Defensive Defenseman Award -- Samuelsson 12) Rico Best Winger Award -- Skinner

I think DM likes Joki quite a bit and that Joki is therefore a lock for the top 4.

I agree with most of this but I think the bolded is a bit off. I think JB absolutely thought Berglund would be a major contributor, both on the ice and in the locker room. He may or may not have also thought Sobotka would be a solid 3rd-liner as well. JB not bothering to determine whether Berglund, who became tradable only due to his agent butchering the administration of his NTC, would rather jump off a bridge than play for the Sabres was grossly incompetent, and one of, unfortunately, many such terrible moves by JB.

I think it was both. The culture change was necessary, and effective, but not sufficient to produce the results we've seen over the last 7 weeks until we got healthier and thus iced a better team.

But Tuch joined the lineup on Dec. 29, and the Sabres were terrible in Jan. and Feb. IMHO, they didn't start playing better until some of the injured forwards returned (or in VO's case, got healthier). That gave them 3 to 4 legit lines, instead of 2 NHL lines and 2 AHL lines.

Oh goody. More temper tantrum gibberish. Do you understand that "may or may not have been part of the problem", which is what I wrote, is not the same as "wasn't part of the problem?" Do you understand that people are going to disagree with you from time to time, and when they do so it may be simply because they disagree with you, and not just "fake slander and bad faith arguments?" I'm not sure how it's "obvious" that I wouldn't want Reino on my team when I say that he's a very good NHL forward who's having a very good season, and that at least 30 NHL GMs would take him over VO. For the record, I would rather have signed Reino to an extension last summer than traded him. As for Hammy being "literally" the only person to criticize Reino's character, here's Mike Harrington, another Sabres beat reporter who is around the team much more than we are, on Reino and how his teammates felt about him: https://auburnpub.com/sports/hockey/mike-harrington-stop-with-sabres-tank-talk-as-team-begins-rebuild/article_fdd83589-9808-545f-bb4f-c721f4011b1e.html As for his skating -- don't take my word (or the word of 90% of Sabrespace) for it -- let's see what he and his teammates have to say: https://theathletic.com/834449/2019/02/23/how-sam-reinhart-has-turned-himself-into-a-steady-points-producer/