North Buffalo

Not unless the court deems it as an overiddingbexception to preserve another right. So no gonna be tough to reg and survive judicial muster. Background check yes but in an expedited manner.

No regulation is an infringement, but from what I remember reading those two exceptions, criminals and mental incompetents, infringements serve an overiding public interest and those convicted no longer have right or competence of full citizens.

Hey what is Kris Letangs status in Pitt, might make a nice switch with Ennis?

"Shall" is the problem from a legislative legal standpoint it is ironclad, infringed has a little more wiggle imo but not much. And crime conviction and mental illness seem to be the only things agreed okay to infringe on the right. Still gun advocated arent backing down and until people like deluca insist on a ban on all, and those equally vocal on the other side, there will be no common sense compromise achieved.

Lmao

But tank 3.0 is a long range solution:)

Nice article Neo and despite my desire at different times of my life to get rid of guns and at others thinking there is a need, I havent yet figured away judicially to actively get around the second amendment that can pass legislative action or stand judicial scrutiny.

Never mind all the illegal ones

Anyone think Tyler could get us a puck moving top 4 D in return? Shiite used "us, the Sabres

Infringement means unlawful use of, has nothing to do with ownership. Nice! Can't wait till game time starts, this last part of this thread has bordered on educating the inane:)

http://www.milweb.net/classifieds.php?type=1 Want to buy a tank.

There are people who own tanks, military doesnt sell to people often. But some old mothballed ones are in a few individual hands.

Oh I agree there needs to be a narrowing of scope of what the amendment allows, but that is the problem it can't be done by administrative or legislative fiat, bit only by amendment. Otherwise our joke of a healthcare insurance system would be regulated by feds not state legislatures, who are bought off by state incorporated but umbrella laiden insurance cos, to avoid the interstate commerce clause.

Oh it was definitely part of a clarification of states rights. The terms shall and unabridged are clear legislative terms that are considered not subject to interpretation. Will, may, can are wishy washy terms that are subject and would have allowed for more interpretation akin to what you propose. Short of a constitutional amendment i am sorry to say you are sol That being said, part of ensuring "a free state" is the preservation of the "right to bear arms" and "shall be unabridged" That part is true, the reason for the right has been eliminated, that being said the right still stands as a separate clause and there in lie the problem outdated or not.

No you misunderstand the role of gov. Even the court. The Supreme court affirmed the distinction in the two clauses, not the right, which was established by the constitution. The legislature writes the legislation, the admin writes the implementing rules and the court interprets that those rules meet the standards of the legislation and enforce those rules

Neo I couldnt agree more and it isnt so much government i fear but big business control and manipulation of of government without the the ability to counter effectively.

Goes with your overcooked Linguine.

It is not under a well regulated militia: The whole amendment reads as follows: Amendment II. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Directly quoted from the US Contitution. You can make up crap anyway you want, but is not constitutional to regulate them unless the right somehow infringes on aonther right and that right is determined to be greater than that of preserving the security of a free state. As much as I hate guns in hands of criminals. Regulate gun dealers and manufacturers and better track them fine, but not ownership.

Lol well regulated militia refers to the state, not the right to bears arms. To preserve a well regulated Militia ...., the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed can only be changed by a change to the constitution. Your twist of those words are worse than a right wing preacher stating sll non believing Christians will rot in hell.

Mandating instant check and purchase/transfer reporting of firearms would be easiest. Ammo regs are nuts since I know guys who still make and load their own. Just would not work.

DeLuca even at a firing range with brass going all over the place it would be a pain and your request is dillusional.

And not Biden doesnt have the temprament to make it work with the media, gets too po'd with them too easily instead of using them as a foil or just blaming the the other side. Takes stuff too personally.

Hmmm but not the argumement made before... something to think about. Still others straight out like home whites... what gives

I am on the color bandwagon, never understood the affinity to the home white idea... too bland whitebread, dull, washed out. Does remind me of Buffalo during the winter...

I think it is Matthews an d Puljujarvi, both can move the puck so well and get others involved, Laine seems more of a pure scorer but less of a set up guy, whereas the other two seem to be able to do both. Is Aho drafted, because he would be a nice late round second round scoring pick. Seems to have nice hands though not the size of the other three. I love Tchuck(sp) too and as stated before, there seem to be a lot of highly rated D, Sabres don't need one right away, but they do need talented depth that can develop so I think this draft may good for that later on.