He is still a dweeb but like the beard he is growing on me. Hoping he uses his picks to get what the Sabres needs. Still looks like the kid you punched in the face in grade school.
yeh i know, and she is gonna hammer him on hispanics, women, promises, financial accounting, minorities, presidential temprament etc, etc. almost predictably boring...,
Part of debating strategy but will depend on how well she counters and if she can needle him in to losing his cool and saying something really stupid. Then ask him to further explain himself show casing both his lack of Presidential temprament and his lack of knowledge.
There are many reasons to why this is a truism, but besides winning she would do this anyway to help get Dems elected to take back over Congress, part of the reason Republicans are pulling their hair out right now. The Senate is in play and now the House is a possibility depending on ground game turnout... scarin the bejeebus outta of the Rs
The general election is a different animal. You need the party organization behind you full force. Like the Bills winning the AFC championship in the early nineties, but couldnt take the next step. Its a different animal.
PS some hx on the filibuster https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster_in_the_United_States_Senate
See previous discussion. Already posted and as already stated Vesey can only sign an entry level contract. Interesting to see but worth gamble to have 6 weeks plus to have Jack work openly on him.
Agreed and he gets 8 weeks to exclusively negotiate. Seriously, trading one third round pick outta 4, this isnt football where a third rounder can step in this year.
True but the 60 vote majority for a fillibuster has been around for a long time, my guess from JEFFERSON, best info probably is "Rules of The Senate" by Lyndon Baines Johnson, may have a better answer when I can get at my pocket constitution.
Because the vote of 60 would be needed to sustain a likely Presidential Veto, I would have to assume.
Yes you need 60 votes to end a filibuster, this rule is to prevent the tyranny of the majority, part of the checks and balances set up by the framers. Id have to reread my history of its implementation and the use of a fillibuster within Senate rules.