K-9

Thanks for the play by play. Now I’ll have to rely on @pastajoefor updates and, frankly, I’m afraid to click on his posts in this thread.

Too bad we can’t read about 213 incidents of people being saved by a gun in the first 145 days of the year vs. 213 mass shootings in the first 145 days of the year.

Have we solved Primeau?

Get that man a donut!

Are you happier about the goal more than you’re sad about clearing the D zone?

I’d take Marner, Connor, or Barzal at number two and in that order. Then Werenski and Rantanen.

Would it surprise you to learn that the majority of gun owners are in favor of banning assault rifles and other sensible gun laws? That’s been the case for decades, too.

I’m well aware you live in Texas and that you know better than anybody just what kind of evil you’re dealing with when it comes to Abbott, Cruz, and that entire Texas tyranny. I was merely saying that the word “irrational” didn’t suffice when describing what kind of hope you’d need to think they’d do a damn thing to try to fix this uniquely American issue.

Per the bold, it’s estimated that there are 120.5 guns per 100 people in the US. In Canada it’s 34.7 guns per 100 people. I’d say we have good reason to think there’s a reasonable chance to be threatened by a gun here.

Irrational hope? More like all out crazy hope. Abbott and Co. are advocating arming teachers as the solution. Any thought of them doing anything constructive about the problem is nuts. This is a state where it’s legal to open carry an assault rifle. And you don’t even NEED a license to do it. Gotta love Texas. Make it hard for people to participate in democracy, make it easy to carry killing machines.

The Australian NFA has been a success. Creative solutions are out there. We just need the political will to implement them.

I don’t know Ink, I suspect those Monday night skivvies are full of bad mojo…among other things.

What’s the underwear color of choice tonight? A bold chartreuse perhaps?

Appert is an idiot.