darksabre

Dammit Phil.

It really never stood a chance. Eichel looked rusty. Reinhart ended up back on line 1 in the third. It's still the wrong place for him in my opinion, but I guess he needs to be there.

I really like what you did with the ceiling, that's a nice touch! That interior window is a riot. I can't believe they didn't just wall it off when they added the foyer. Kitchen looks soooo much better.

I would give Ullmark tonight and Friday. Hutton for Calgary on Wednesday. I doubt Housley does it though.

I could see him going to Pittsburgh.

I'm not sure about Risto down low. He tends to fare poorly in tight spaces. But I quite like Reinhart at the point. I would try that for sure.

?

Hollywood Squares was a great show. They should bring it back.

Tampa's graph is ridiculous

I would be fine with that. The important part of that Reinhart goal was that he shot the puck. It's like they're completely different players when they know it's 5v5.

The second PP unit started one of the PP opportunities tonight and I thought that was a good call. PP2 doesn't waste much time getting shots on net. PP1 still doesn't know what to do with the puck when they have it. It's very weird.

Losing to Tampa doesn't bother me much since we're not catching them in the standings, but it makes last night's loss a lot worse. I didn't think they played a bad game. The PP still needs work.

Like Tampa needed this game handed to them. Thanks stripes.

My feed crapped out so I missed the Eichel penalty. Did we get jobbed?

There's no way Larsson should have gotten a penalty there.

That's not really fair to Linus lol

Brutal

You rang?

Not a bad period but some of our skill guys are overhandling the puck. Sometimes a simple play is okay.

He was at the end of his shift though. Knock Sobotka for being crap at clearing the puck too.

Extremely unusual but I'll take it!

Domingue sucks lol

It's funny how bad the power play can look but then they know exactly what to do 5v5.

That's not the point at all. Maybe you're one of those people who poopoos fancy stats, but the fancy stats were right about what this team was doing during the streak: getting extremely lucky.

This is factually incorrect. The underlying metrics of the streak indicate, clear as day, that they were extremely lucky.