SDS

Just subscribe to Grammarly if it’s concerning.

He passed away several years ago.

Millbank?

All good.

Maybe I should sit outside his house and plan to beat/kill him. Would that be more in line with your masculinity Hank?

OK Dunning-Krueger. 🙄 There is an onside and there is an offside. There are no multiple sides that are off. It is unequivocally singular. It’s cringy. You hear it from dumb jocks on broadcasts because they barely got out of high school. Then the public repeats it. It’s the same exact scenario in football where they say a team has a +10 turnover ratio when it’s actually a differential. Both are grossly incorrect and repeated incessantly by dumb ex-jocks.

offside. Singular.

This probably applies to STHs that sell 100% of their games.

After every single Sabres game you come here and discount the win by saying the only reason why the Sabres won is because the other team played like garbage. Beyond tiresome.

Quite frankly, it’s beyond absurd.

He was hooked around the stomach.

The only time I wouldn’t piss on Jeremy Roenick is if he was on fire.

This is flat out wrong. Do you really want to go through the list of veterans that have brought in over the last 12 years? Craig Rivet? Brian Gianta? Kyle Okposo? Jeff Skinner? Eric Johnson? Eric Staal? Ryan O’Reilly? Marcus Johansson? Taylor Hall? And a whole slew of others I’m not even going to bother to go through.

This is not as clever as you think it is.

Are you specifically talking about the scoring chances he had?

So you post garbage. Solicit opinions about that said garbage. Get told your opinion is garbage. And then make a report that someone’s calling your opinion garbage. 🙄 And this was the nicest thing I could say about the situation.

I am part of the some people who are talking about today’s game and not about the season. so, like I said… Some people.

Some people are posting about the game. You’re posting about the season. Those are different conversations.

I guess it just depends on the definition of bad. They lost on a fluke goal bad dominated the vast majority of the game, even killing off a couple of five V3. Is that bad? I guess it’s bad because you’re not winning. The corollary to that would be Dallas was good because they won. They were not good this game.

I guess you can say it’s bad when you don’t score. It’s hard to say they were freaking bad that game IMO.

apparently, he has nothing better to do than to mock my one post every two weeks.

How long are you going to try and be funny with this?

How many years will Kevyn need to be GM before he moves from an inexperienced GM to an experienced one?

[This is an automated response] The topic title is potentially misleading. Accurate titles help the community find topics relevant to their interests and avoids reader frustration. Please change the topic title to more accurately reflect content of the original post.The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.