All Activity

He gets 30min in Seattle. Idc that much is they give him pk and pp time in Rochester. He needs about 22-25min a night

If you zoom way out to look at his record overall in sports, Pegula isn’t cheap, he just over-reacted to COVID and draws lines over arbitrary things. I also think his reputation for interference is over-wrought. It’s more about capriciousness again, combined with hiring poor managers, who have also been unskilled at managing their boss. In 14 years he’s yet to fire someone for failing to ice a good team, despite never icing a good team. His biggest flaw is he’s never been about winning.

I disagree with this. He made some nice plays that give me hope for the future with him. But he lost way too many 50/50 board battles for me to say he belonged in the HNL now.

This issue is a judgment call. However, I see it differently. What happens if he plays well in the AHL? From the little that I have seen playing with a higher level of talent, it doesn't appear to have hurt him. In fact, I would argue otherwise, that it has and will accelerate his development. Is he an exception to the rule regarding the handling young prospects? I think so yet understand why others don't in this particular case.

The question is, would he be better served getting 20 minutes in Seattle? Or 16 in Rochester?

No, not retired.

I guess Greenway also. I just don't think he is too hard to replace. The drop-off from greenway to whoever replaces him, IMO, isn't all that significant.

Sometimes explanations are simpler than one might expect. The problem isn't so much about the amount of money he spent as it is in the decisions being made. The owner came in gangbusters thinking that throwing money around would give his team instant credibility. What he learned is spending money foolishly, no matter what the amount is, is simply wasting money. The owner has made a number of bad decisions, especially in staffing. And to compound the problem, this self-made billionaire is a stubborn man who was inclined to double down rather than alter course. The reality is that this franchise is structured the way he wanted it and is staffed the way he wanted it. Ineptitude is ineptitude. He has sabotaged himself. Has he learned from his mistakes? Maybe so. I'm not really sure because this fellow with the off big boat doesn't talk much.

Didn’t see the game, but do want to point out that Georgiev is not a big goalie. He’s 6-1 178 compared to Levi at 6-0 192. Luukkonen and Leinonen are the bigs in the system.

Definitely not what you want to see, even if you put it into perspective.

For the first 45 minutes the Sabres were in total control, as in Pittsburgh could create absolutely nothing. And then that happened. Again the goalie and the PK didn’t get it done, but that went deeper. Id shrug and say it’s just preseason fuel for the real season, but the inability to close was their primary characteristic last year and what they needed most to address. Troubling.

He is a June Birthday and just turned 18 and has played total of 43 games in North America. The primary reason he come over to Seattle was his lack of playing time in the Czech League. I agree with @dudacek about Leone.

Okay - so I see that the essential concern is: We (many?) want him at 26+ minutes per game playing in all situations. Will he get that in Roch? Maybe, maybe not. I’d guess: Most certainly not. Good convo here:

I just don't think these things are determined in pre-season games. I agree that some data is used from the games. I believe pre-season matters, just not a lot. It's more relative IMO. They know what the lines will be to start the season, minus a minor tweak or two or injury. The lines get established and often change for various reasons, for even the excellent teams. The system is also established in practice, film room and throughout the season. Hard work mindset, well that's a tough one and I can't imagine pre-season games are a large factor.

Looks like he’s good enough, and physically ready. He needs to be playing significant minutes and situations, not watching Metsa and Komarov. I’m trepidatious, but I trust Leone more than anyone else on staff.

Lyon is a key, no doubt. Norris was very good with Ottawa, he just needs to stay healthy. You need 2 scoring lines. Tuch helps us get that. With Peterka gone they needs others to step up and produce more goals (Quinn, Benson, Kulich) while still maintaining the contributions from McLoed and Zucker.

Your position makes a lot of sense. However, I think that playing with older and better players, even as a lower pairing player, would be better preparation for him. I also think that the better training facilities and traveling accommodations will better serve him.

31-37% of our starting roster has changed.

Ok. Thanks.

Even if UPL was healthy I see Lyon as the better (safer) option in net. I hope Norris can stay healthy. He can put the puck in the net. A first line with Tage and Norris should be productive. My preference would be to include Tuch on that first line but it appears that Ruff sees it differently.

Chad D says it’d be bad to go from AHL to WHL. Myself, I have no clue.

No he was a European Transfer to the Seattle so the NHL CHL Rules do not apply to him

He is 18 and drafted from the WHL juniors. Is his time in Rochester limited? It must be.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they just have him practice with the team for the week and then send him back to Seattle.