Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Yes the numbers certainly bear that out. Sorry for suggesting otherwise
  3. They also need to trade rostered players to make room for the guys coming in through the trades you are suggesting.
  4. You could pair Dahlin with a scarecrow (or even Matt Tennyson) and get comparable results.
  5. Right, because Dahlin is at 70% with everybody.
  6. There’s tons of things they can do. They can trade their first round pick The things they can do fall under the category of “well, WELL, no one else does that so” ..so they don’t get considered. But the sabres RECORD is something no one else does. They should trade their first, trade Konsta H, any future asset they can in the name of competing this year: there will be a draft next year, you’ll get your 7 picks people, it’ll be ok
  7. He’s not contributing to the pair’s output Dahlin is the pair. Byram is a statistical passenger Byram isn’t good. You disagree. Thankfully he’s almost gone so we can stop rehashing this Today? It looks very bad - that’s the part I disagree with. Bad, with a side of prolific goal scorer
  8. Glad to see I’m not the only one around here stooping to using sarcasm. On that note, they probably would have been much better off just sticking with Dylan Cozens, or trading Cozens for Filip Chytil instead.
  9. Again, all of this is not the point. I knew I shouldn't have mentioned that trade for these exact reasons. But all I'm trying to say is that the return of a trade will look different as time passes. One year after that trade it looked very bad. Today? We have the most prolific goal scorer this franchise has seen in 30 years. Judging McLeod/Savoie today? It's mostly pointless (but at least it's better than a day 0 judgement).
  10. If net neutral means 70% goals for, sure. Oh right, goals for and against is the single most meaningless stat.
  11. Today
  12. It’s true, he was exposed quite severely His best talent is not actively dragging Dahlin down. Sort of like you or I would. But he has that goingfor him: he can be a net neutral when playing with a top 5 league D
  13. Yes, roughly the first 18 he had a chance to play since “recovering” from his shoulder Honestly, though if im the sabres (not you) - I’d be comfortable penciling him in for top 6 duty for 70-80 even though he’s never done it because why not? honestly a gamble here makes sense, we have some runway to work with. And he can snipe.
  14. Was Krebs ever on the Top Prospect Team? (Joking). But I think Helenius has more value than Krebs ever did. Östlund is probably similar though. I just happen to like Östlund a lot.
  15. 0-11 is what happened when Dahlin was out injured. Byram was put in Dahlin's slot and the team was essentially the expansion Caps. Also +/- is the single most useless and worthless stat in all of hockey.
  16. Agree with you, but not for this reason. It’s already a win for St. Louis, yes. But from our perspective, if we traded Thompson today for a 5th round pick and the pick becomes Ovechkin in 6 years it’s not a good trade. This is an extreme example but Tage becoming good will never make torpedoing that team just as Eichel was coming off his ELC retroactively good. It will always be bad. Did people forget what it led to with Finkle and Einhorn? We still haven’t won. It was a terrible trade
  17. That's what Florida does and they're masters at it. This is shaping up to be an all-time series. We'll see where it goes from here. Knobloch seems to have the magic touch. Talk about knowing your team.
  18. The NY Rangers 2025 1st round pick was Top 13 protected this year (was in the JT Miller trade) so doesnt that mean the NY Rangers 2026 1st automatically goes to Vancouver?
  19. Just because they're our best players doesn't mean they're worth a sack of potatoes.
  20. ::gestures wildly at everything except our two or three best players::
  21. I’m not entirely sure what 0-11 represents, but if you are trying to say Byram’s play is directly responsible for a team losing streak and has no bearing on goals scored when he’s on the ice, there’s no point talking.
  22. Selective reading sure is fun, isn’t it?
  23. No it does not. St Louis won the Cup.
  24. Bernard Docker makes Spence less relevant but I'd kick the tires.
  25. Meaningless number: +11 Meaningful number: 0-11
  26. The Sabres side of the McNabb trade tree ended (DesLauriers, Fasching) as such: D Zach Redmond played 3 games for Buffalo, 3 seasons in total for Rochester, and left for the DEL. D Brandon Hickey played parts of 2 seasons in Rochester and is still in the AHL today with Henderson. RW Mike Sislo never played for Rochester and retired in 2020. This is how McNabb ends, this is how McNabb ends, this is how McNabb ends. Not with a Redmond, nor with a Hickey. Fun fact: With the two 2nd round picks Los Angeles ALSO received, they selected Alex Lintuniemi in 2014 and Eric Cernak in 2015. Funner fact: The next pick taken after Lintuniemi was the Sabres with pick #1 of the third round: Jonas Johanson. The 4th pick of that 2014 3rd round: Brandon Hickey! But before you feel bad, don't worry about the picks the Sabres took in the 2014 draft. If they had had an additional 2nd it wouldn't have mattered because this was the draft of Lemieux, Cornel, and Karabacek. And in 2015, they took Brendan Guhle. Just lots of hits in the second those seasons.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...