LGR4GM Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Buffalo is reportedly worth 1.36 billion. That's 29th in the league. They also managed to generate 174-183 million in revenue last yr which is shocking considering how awful they've become and how run down the arena is. "next six lowest revenue-generating clubs — Buffalo, Utah, Ottawa, San Jose, Anaheim and Winnipeg — still made between $174 million and $183 million last season." https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6680260/2025/10/01/nhl-franchise-valuations-team-worth-sportico/ Quote
tom webster Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: Buffalo is reportedly worth 1.36 billion. That's 29th in the league. They also managed to generate 174-183 million in revenue last yr which is shocking considering how awful they've become and how run down the arena is. "next six lowest revenue-generating clubs — Buffalo, Utah, Ottawa, San Jose, Anaheim and Winnipeg — still made between $174 million and $183 million last season." https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6680260/2025/10/01/nhl-franchise-valuations-team-worth-sportico/ It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, tom webster said: It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. There is a difference between franchise values and operating in the red. Does $180MM/yr pay the bills? I don't know all the Sabres expenses. Edited 1 hour ago by PromoTheRobot 3 Quote
shrader Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Without Winnipeg, that's a whole lot of playoff drought on that lowest revenue list (I know, Ottawa). That whole thing feels like a big chicken or the egg thing on what is coming first. I'll hold off on Utah for now because who the hell knows what they have there yet. Quote
LGR4GM Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago 29 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: The is a difference between franchise values and operating in the red. Does $180MM/yr pay the bills? I don't know all the Sabres expenses. Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. 1 Quote
JohnC Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. Are the Sabres in the red or black when the revenues/costs are tabulated? Just my opinion, but if the owner had a competitive team that made the playoffs, the generated revenue would be around 50% more. Save a penny and lose a dollar. 1 Quote
Big Guava Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 58 minutes ago, tom webster said: It’s only shocking if people have believed the long held myth that these franchises lose money. Making small amounts of money by pinching every penny possible like many NHL teams do versus making crap loads of money while spending money like it's free as they do in the NFL are completely different things. Also "revenue" is not profit. Edited 1 hour ago by Big Guava 1 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 42 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Does 180 million pay all the bills for a team that only spends half that on the cap? I'd hope so. I don't know. What other expenses are there? Teams have more employees than just players. What about rent, taxes, insurance? Are you aware that a salary is only about 60% of the cost of an employee? Edited 1 hour ago by PromoTheRobot 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: I don't know. What other expenses are there? Teams have more employees than just players. Yea I'm sure Jan in accounting is really making it hard for Terry to afford her 60k a year. Also as noted up thread, Terry is saving a penny to cost himself a dollar. This team would make far more money if they made the playoffs. Edited 1 hour ago by LGR4GM Quote
tom webster Posted 38 minutes ago Report Posted 38 minutes ago Thanks to everyone that is explaining the difference between revenue and profit. You all must work for the government or an accounting firm because I can’t imagine anyone else cares about profit. You all need to look up an old WKRP episode where Doctor Johnny Fever explained the myth of profit. These guys are all making money. Very rich, very smart people are doing something normally foreign to them; they are begging for inclusion. They wouldn’t be doing that for the privilege of losing money. Quote
PASabreFan Posted 8 minutes ago Report Posted 8 minutes ago 3 hours ago, LGR4GM said: Buffalo is reportedly worth 1.36 billion. That's 29th in the league. They also managed to generate 174-183 million in revenue last yr which is shocking considering how awful they've become and how run down the arena is. "next six lowest revenue-generating clubs — Buffalo, Utah, Ottawa, San Jose, Anaheim and Winnipeg — still made between $174 million and $183 million last season." https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6680260/2025/10/01/nhl-franchise-valuations-team-worth-sportico/ I'm hung up on the word made. Made implies profit to me. I think it refers to revenues tho. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.