CallawaySabres Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 I am starting to think that our loser core group just makes these guys look way better than they are. There is no way the alternative can just be a coincidence every single night. There is not ONE closer on this team...not ONE (referring to forwards) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 I am starting to think that our loser core group just makes these guys look way better than they are. There is no way the alternative can just be a coincidence every single night. There is not ONE closer on this team...not ONE (referring to forwards) Darcy's happy with them, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PASabreFan Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Darcy's happy with them, though. Tyler Ennis is not a bad person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Tyler Ennis is not a bad person. None of the people here are. Makes me feel all better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunomatic Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Thats the problem with Regiers approach to building a cup winner (uh...and Darcy,that is the goal here). Regardless of the fact that these may be good people he should be willing to trade his first born child or the dalai lama if it imroved the team. He has these unhealthy attachments to his 'boys' that don't benefit this franchise at all. Someone please explain to Regeir that your children eventually have to leave the nest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 I am starting to think that our loser core group just makes these guys look way better than they are. There is no way the alternative can just be a coincidence every single night. There is not ONE closer on this team...not ONE (referring to forwards) This "closer" term needs to stay where it orginated, baseball. When I hear announcers referring to Kobe as the best closer in the NBA, I cringe. Now it's being used in reference to hockey players? Can we just stick with "clutch"? Is it that hard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 This "closer" term needs to stay where it orginated, baseball. When I hear announcers referring to Kobe as the best closer in the NBA, I cringe. Now it's being used in reference to hockey players? Can we just stick with "clutch"? Is it that hard? Who cares what it's called. We don't have one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.