deluca67 Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 A blockbuster deal for the Redskins. Makes them a instant contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePebble19 Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 It will certainly be interesting to see how McNabb can do with a team that has a consistant, solid running game. Probably better receivers than he had in Philly, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deluca67 Posted April 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 It will certainly be interesting to see how McNabb can do with a team that has a consistant, solid running game. Probably better receivers than he had in Philly, too. For the record, I had no interest in McNabb being a Buffalo Bill. They are such a mess and need so much everywhere I doubt he would make a difference for one year. I doubt he would extend here in Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePebble19 Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 For the record, I had no interest in McNabb being a Buffalo Bill. They are such a mess and need so much everywhere I doubt he would make a difference for one year. I doubt he would extend here in Buffalo. I would have only had interest in him if they were to reach an extension to make it worthwhile. But, just like the TO mistake/experiment, it would more than likely only last 1 year, and that does nothing for the development of any of the offense. This does a number to the mock drafts out there now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 I would have only had interest in him if they were to reach an extension to make it worthwhile. But, just like the TO mistake/experiment, it would more than likely only last 1 year, and that does nothing for the development of any of the offense. This does a number to the mock drafts out there now. It changes the whole draft situation, no doubt, but it does not make the Redskins a contender. That team has problems that transcend the quarterback position. You folks think Golisano and/or Wilson are problems? Try a day in a Redskins fan's shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Philly must have no respect for the skins to trade him there. Kinda like bledsoe to buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wjag Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Maybe Philly knows something that Washington doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strow Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 They sent him to Washington for two reason that they said 1. He will start and they wanted him to be the clear cut starter on a half way good team (oakland would be a slap in the face). 2. Only team that offered anything good for him. McSuck is terrible he can't complete a 15 yard pass. He has way too many passed that bounce even before they get to a WR. Also off topic Philly WR are much better than Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePebble19 Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Maybe Philly knows something that Washington doesn't. Its a good point...Philly has a knack for telling when a guy is "done." Not too many guys have had great careers after leaving Philly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 Philly must have no respect for the skins to trade him there. Kinda like bledsoe to buffalo. What I'm wondering is how did New England get a 1st round pick out of us? McNabb has to have higher standing in this league right now than Bledsoe did at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReneRobert Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 What I'm wondering is how did New England get a 1st round pick out of us? McNabb has to have higher standing in this league right now than Bledsoe did at that point. I think part of it is the influence of historical experience. Precisely because the Bills gave up a first for Bledsoe with mixed results fewer teams are willing to do so now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted April 5, 2010 Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 It will certainly be interesting to see how McNabb can do with a team that has a consistant, solid running game. Probably better receivers than he had in Philly, too. Definitely a better LT also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.