Jump to content

Doohickie

Members
  • Posts

    39,122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Doohickie

  1. Possibly not. I know everyone wants a guaranteed solution, but there are no guarantees. If Luuk is a good starter this year and will be no worse next year, and Levi a below-average backup this year but is likely to improve year-over-year, the Sabres could be in a pretty good spot; possibly an Ullmark/Swayman type combination that by mid-next season will just be hitting their stride as a duo. On the other hand, what depth is there? They Sabres used 3 goalies this year, a fairly normal occurrence. Who's out No. 3 if someone gets dinged up? Last season the Sabres used 4 goalies; the prior two seasons they used 6! If no major injuries occur and Levi is even a little better, the Sabres are okay. But if Levi doesn't improve, or UPL or Levi regresses, or one suffers a longish-term injury, the Sabres need depth. They're finally getting to the point of acceptable depth on D and the forwards have at least a couple lines of top talent and forwards in the pipeline. Both those situations support making the playoffs next year. But goalie depth doesn't look good without bringing in a vet for depth, the way I see it.
  2. I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying that the fact that Kevyn and Donny are talking about next year does not imply that Kevyn won't fire Donny. Donny is still part of Kevyn's senior staff; why wouldn't he consult with him on future planning? My point is that while yes, Donny in all likelihood is back next year, this quote is not an indicator of that. It's an indicator of normal GM-HC interaction.
  3. Funny thing is, that's kind of what happened with Sammy Watkins.
  4. "Donny said 'The plan next year is...' So this means ...This means Donny is 100% back next year? Clearly him and GMKA have talked about this?" All it implies about Donny's return is that he hasn't been notified of his dismissal yet.
  5. I don't see them moving both of these guys, nor do I think they should. Based on career trajectories I think they would move Joki who's an established roster player. Bryson, on the other hand, has become a depth defenseman you're not afraid to put out there. I'd try to keep him as a 7/8 D and he'd probably be okay with that. I don't think you want to count on callups of prospects in Rochester to be your defensive depth; you want a mature player. Bryson is the second oldest Dman on the team and seems to have come of age this season.
  6. I was more upset about the Mitts trade, tbh.
  7. The only counterpoint I have is that the best ability is availability. Quinn is a gritty player and so far his body hasn't backed that up. JJP is perhaps a notch down from Quinn but he hasn't spent time on IR like Quinn has.
  8. And it seems like JJP jumps in and out of that group. Sometimes he's right up with them, sometimes not so much. I hope with the experience he's getting he can be more consistently in that group.
  9. It's definitely better when Jeff is the host, but that was a'right.
  10. That might just give Dylan his mojo back. In general, that's part of why I hope there's a coaching change: I want fresh eyes to look at this roster and see how all the pieces fit together. To be fair, Donny's doing that a bit now, but now it's too late.
  11. If Cozens was half as crafty with the puck as either Quinn or Benson that would be an amazing line.
  12. That will never happen. Honestly... I say give him all the minutes he can handle. We need to have him as a 3C or know that he's not capable. Either way, giving him minutes is the only way to know.
  13. Watching this game I have to wonder how the Caps are even in a playoff spot?
  14. Along with the early goals...😅 ...and the in between goals.
  15. OMG look how far off BOTH D are from Strome! One of them has to take that guy in front.
  16. I don't think he needs it, not in the greasy areas where he lives.
×
×
  • Create New...