-
Posts
8,498 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Scottysabres
-
I'm going with the chicken bone one, anyone have a "Bettman swallows the Bone" meme?
-
Updated Todd McLellan OUT of the Running Sabres HC Position
Scottysabres replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
"It's a situation where he's a candidate to be coach" ~ The conversation in Jason Botterill's mind...... -
Updated Todd McLellan OUT of the Running Sabres HC Position
Scottysabres replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Pefula's have already proven time on contract isn't an issue. They did that with Bylsma. The franchise looking like it doesn't know what its doing? They would be hiring a coach. To much emphasis on the $ and term. It won't affect the club in the least bit on that end imo. -
As I stated, I don't believe he is there at 7. And I agree, both Zegras and Caufield are smaller. But I believe Turcotte is going 4, 5 or 6.
-
Another small bodied forward, no thanks.
-
Updated Todd McLellan OUT of the Running Sabres HC Position
Scottysabres replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Tied to him? If the contract is terminated and bought out we are no more tied to him than a bee that flew through the yard, and moved on with some pollen. As for looking like idiots, it's not our money, it's the Pegula's, it doesn't effect us one way or the other. The guy is a coach, money and term are semantics at this point, if you don't like the choice, feel he's not the right fit, fine, but don't use the contract as some sort of crutch to say it just isn't right. The contract has nothing to do with that. -
Updated Todd McLellan OUT of the Running Sabres HC Position
Scottysabres replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
I don't see why anyone would get their panties in a bunch over a coaches contract offer. It's not like it's on the salary cap. It's Pegula's money, if they wish to spend, then who is anyone to criticize them for doing so? I mean really, that's like telling one or all of their family they can't wear socks, or certain shirts or some crap. It's a contract, it's their money, if true, let them spend it. A contract can be bought out if it doesn't work and Pegula's have already proven that. Complaining about this is laughable to be honest. -
I don't think Turcotte makes it to 7, and even if he did, he is most certainly not what the Sabres need, another small bodied player. I don't even think he's on the radar to be honest. Dach most likely won't be there either. I see Cozens, Zegras, Caufield or Boldy as the realistic choices for the Sabres.
-
Guess it depends on who is there at 7. Krebs, Dach, Cozens, Turcotte. I believe one of these guys will be there.
-
ok, so who we taking at 7th lol
-
7th it is
-
What are our chances, 8.5% at 1st over all? I would chuckle if we won it.
-
So where did we land? 5, 6, 7 or 8?
-
Updated Todd McLellan OUT of the Running Sabres HC Position
Scottysabres replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
100% this -
I firmly believe trots should be our coach.
-
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
LTS, surely your not going down that road? "Perhaps I missed where the Democrats are importing illegal citizens into the country? They may not be as opposed to it, but to declare that they are the causation of it is unfounded. People have been entering this country illegally for longer than any one party has had power." If your not beyond discussing this honestly, then there is nothing more to say I reckon. If you are unwilling to admit the Democrat Party is not only encouraging illegal crossings of the border, but actually facilitate it by their very support, then, I guess we have nothing to discuss. This isn't a game to myself LTS, I would like you to understand, I've seen the results first hand. I am no more, nor less, a complete supporter of protection for us, citizens. My counter question to you is this...…………………...why is this even debatable given the KNOWN cases of lost citizens lives? Are their lives NOT WORTH the effort to protect them? If you answer in the positive for illegal immigrants in either questions, then why SHOULD I PAY taxes at all? Since my family, my self, are not, in point of fact, to receive the services payed for? More importantly, and I know, this sounds so hysterical, but why shouldn't I grab what fire arms I have and immediately head for the border to shot on sight, because the only protection myself and my family have is to do so, since the agencies I PAY FOR put in place are unable to do so SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE DEMOCRATS protect THESE MURDERERS? These are valid questions, as well as potential actions that may have to take place to prevent my loved ones from being murdered, no? Is it not a possibility? I say it is based on data. -
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
Good for you. -
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
I would love to see the families of those that lost loved ones to illegal immigrants put that tinfoil hat on your head. Ohhhhhh the facial expression would be priceless...…………..wouldn't it? Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot, your one of those...……….f^^k'em citizens. -
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
This is very true, on the 2 headed monster of Republican/Democrat scenario. The 2 party system is actually the epitome of this article. -
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
True, you can look at it as "Walling people out". Or, as any common sense citizen can look at it, it's preventing results that are catastrophic to CITIZENS families WHILE ENFORCING the policies set forth by LAW. While you see Nazi Germany? I assume that is what you see in any event, I SEE the ability to better the security of CITIZENS LIVES. And, since you said you were out, I rest my case on conversation. The DEMOCRAT PARTY, and their SUPPORTERS and ALLIES are a DIRECT THREAT TO MY LIFE, MY FAMILIES LIFE, MY LOVED ONES, FRIENDS, PEERS LIVES. You did nothing to convince me other wise, As a matter of fact, YOU REINFORCED IT. Scotty, not OUT, but fully ENGAGED. -
Donald J Trump, your thoughts on his Presidency
Scottysabres replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Oval Office (Politics)'s Topics
You'd be surprised Swamp. At least, In our inter actions I think you would. But I'm pro-single payer system. While I don't want to enslave the medical community, of which by the way, my sister is a part of, I do want to ensure our ENTIRE POPULATION, CITIZENS, are covered FOR ALL PROCEDURES. I do not agree with, nor do I subscribe to the way President Obama, and the Democrat controlled House and Senate did so. I mean, come on, you even have one of the primary architects of the Affordable Care Act on audio stating they were LYING to the CITIZENS. What do you want me to say on that alone? I'm going to say the SAME THING I SAID when CRIMINAL PRESIDENT BUSH invaded Iraq. This shouldn't be so difficult for individuals such as ourselves to communicate on such broad stroke issues, and yet, here we are. You, defending an ideology. Myself, defending the foundations of what makes this nation...………..well...………...us. There has to be common sense in this conversation, to date, anyone on this sight has brought 0, to myself. LTS does ask very good questions, but, in the end, questions don't offer solutions. I don't have them all, but some of the more, as I said above, "COMMON SENSE" solutions shouldn't even be debatable. When you look at the totality of the carnage left in the wake of promoting policies that negatively impact CITIZENS, you have to expect US CITIZENS to look at you and say...………………….WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT...……………………..that's just human nature.