Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    39,644
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. How they’ll react? You said it yourself in bold Seasons beatings
  2. Certainly by no strength of my posting, but nonetheless you seem to be starting to see what I’m trying to communicate with Adams. Adams simply deserves to be fired. It’s not a commentary on whether he is the biggest issue, or whether it will make a difference it’s a commentary on the fact it would be the just result.
  3. It’s not our job to figure it out. It’s our job to accurately reflect the product that’s the most honest course of action
  4. I guess the distinction for me where “nonsense” is concerned is that: my ability to cope with it is inversely tied to how much the particular hockey opinion is infused and backed by a professional salary maybe it’s absurd, but I have a higher tolerance for Joe message board being seemingly off base than I do the guy being paid more money than I’ll probably make in my lifetime
  5. Finally someone gets it
  6. I’m the guy posting facts (2 of last 160 playoff teams spent as we have) you must be the other guy
  7. Says watching the games he has zero idea what they are doing structurally
  8. Says Adams is accumulating too many of the same player
  9. lol they said on sportsnet Pegula picked Montreal specifically because he thought they had a decent chance to win and he wanted it to look like he initiated a turning point Lmaooo Versteeg on saying that the “no reinforcements coming” talk usually ends with a bunch of players getting traded That it’s a last ditch effort
  10. Pretty salient why a historically bad team wouldn’t have a historically negative board is beyond me. I agree Think about how mad that makes you..seeing the same thing over and over and over again with no improvement. Drives you to the point of commenting incessantly on it, eh? Can’t say I blame you
  11. Heck, I knew I wasn’t wasting my time around here arguing about why dealing Jack was a mistake. Time bears all things out
  12. Meh. There’s a very compelling answer. Only 2 of the last 160 playoff teams spend bottom 10. We are spending bottom 10. Is this not the elephant of elephants? Why ignore such a compelling trend? We don’t spend enough. We are too young. Those are almost certainly the reasons If it says 98.75% likely it’ll rain and you get wet when you go outside, asking “did someone drop a bucket of water on me that I missed?”, while technically possible, seems to be a bit of a fruitless pursuit
  13. At least they respectfully hung the jersey lol
  14. Was gonna say, the Sabres are leading off every hockey talk show up here. that’s…never a good thing
  15. 🤔
  16. He might step down when Adams gets fired
  17. Like this dude needs to be fired purely on the basis of being a terrible front man. If he’s there to be the front man he should be fired for performance on a professional level to every bit of the extent I’d fire him for team building bozo the clown making it harder on his players i say this with the utmost sincerity: Go back to Carolina
  18. Beetlejuice beetlejuice Beetlejuice!
  19. We forget how young the players are, and how easily accessible social media is: they have plenty of time to be on their phones and social media and to see how much of a laughing stock we’ve been since the palm tree bit. And it was at quite a humorous level before that. This situation just looks beyond them - the league is hard enough for a young player on a good day
  20. I wouldn’t be surprised if Jack Eichel himself felt bad for Buffalo fans right now lol
  21. And all we have to do to find out is fire an unquestioned buffoon. There’s no way anyone believes it can be worse look at us right now
×
×
  • Create New...