qwksndmonster

So a smart way to rebuild is to put a bunch of rookies on the ice and hope they grow into a team? If your young guys aren't put in a position to succeed, then you can ruin their development. I don't want Grigorenko and Armia taking top defensive pairings next year. I know you love ripping on your boy LGR, but can't you rip on him for this when he's actually proposing a trade?

Instead of glamorizing our own players, you glamorize all the big, strong men in the league :wub: You said yourself a while back that you didn't like Hodgson as much because of the style of player he was. And now you're saying he's the next Stafford. The first way of doing it is fine, because it's your frank opinion on what get's you excited about young players. Saying he's the next Stafford, when all signs indicate he has a great work ethic, is just spewing bile.. I'll gladly "fanboi" Sabres players any day, because that's what pro sports are all about: being excited about your team and having fun watching them.

Their old blues stuff was so under produced and visceral. Just simply awesome. Their gradient of music style seems to start at blues and slowly move towards rock. Kind of how the Chili Peppers went from funk to alternative. But I like the Black Keys' new stuff a lot better than I ever liked the Chili Peppers' new stuff.

Yup. I would gladly pay that money not only so the youngins can grow but so the Sabres will have more talent as well. As TW and GC have said, we wont be anywhere near the cap.

If Grigorenko's playing with the Sabres, it better be with Vanek and Ennis on his wings. Anything else is a waste of time.

Fixed.

:beer:

We're in disagreement, that's fine, I get that, but you're wrong and I hate you.

Your forgot Ehrhoff. Just slip him in where Myers is and assume we trade Myers for a bag of pucks (just a joke),

You still need top line guys to take the best defensive matchups so that the youngins aren't forced into that role.

I definitely haven't seen enough of Enroth to justify making him the starter, but I do have high hopes for him. And I want to resign Vanek.

:( Can't even get losing right. At least all the rest of our games are against playoff teams (and WPG who always beats us and will be fighting for the 8th seed most likely).

Vanek has deceptive speed. That means he uses it once or twice every week.

I think his value is more of an unknown quantity. Nobody remembers seeing him make any plays, good or bad. Stafford for Malkin.

Sekera.

Scott surprised me this year. He's a solid 4th liner, a troll, and the icing is that he's a great fighter.

Yay, more garbage points. Nice play by Flynn and Porter on the third goal.

Neither did I. Nice move.

See how much Patty Wah's hurtful words hurted him.

you're*

I think it's an odd choice because the song is so much about the build up rather than just an awesome chorus.

My source (made up stuff from my brain) tells me that he'll be in Roch.

I think they win 2 or more games, but they may be in a Carolina-esque free fall and lose out.

:unsure: You're worried about the message the lyrics to our goal song send?

I'm negative all the time and we suck now, so that means I'm always right.