...

I suggest non-gender specific silhouettes and earth tones.

In our modern, highly sensitive society, I propose they are renamed "The Buffalo Persons".

Depends on what his Def_xG looks like. If it's not improved, it'll be like he nets one goal all season.

Pulujarvi...based on what I'm reading here, if we were to try, I think trading KO for him straight up would be the only thing I'd like to do. Or, maybe, Sobotka. https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/future-hold-jesse-puljujarvi-edmonton-oilers/

This isn't a "highlights" video, those are all of his goals.

Please, please, let it not be that Botterill is just acquiring what he can with the hope that he can put together trade packages.

Two words: goal differential.

The problem is, the entire galaxy knows we're stacked, so we're not quite dealing from a position of strength.

At ~ $3 mil a year?

Speculative. Just like I can speculate there's a glut of bottom 6 wingers and defense, so there must be a plan to deal with that instead of being "curious" how the landscape looks.

Wingers don't need to identify with a side in the new NHL. That's part of why RK is here. The new model.

I don't mind that he's not overpaying for anything, but the Amerks are getting "depth" as if they believe the Sabres stand a chance at a deep run and are padding themselves in lieu of injuries.

If he's slated for the first line Botterill needs to be fired immediately.

Big world, small window.

I'm getting the Blase Thomas Golisano goosebumps!

Yeah, but you said "adequate defensively".

There is?

This was a waste of a third, no matter how bad a third projects to be.

Yeah. At least Botterill had a good reason to take a chance on Sheary.

Not quite a clone, but effectively as ineffective defensively.

Defensive nightmare. He's like Sheary's doppelganger.

Third line.

Any relation to this guy?

With our current D roster...you do this trade all day. There's no way this is real.

What happened to Johansson during the 2017-2018 season?