...

Since when? I thought NHL.tv blocked out your local sports provider, which in our case would be MSG.

You better turn them in! Write MSG an email, let 'em know they've let the vile FuboTV get away with it for too long.

Anyone who says the fight scenes in John Wick 3 are too long and boring are totally missing the point...among other things.

IP-based if I'm not mistaken. I seem to recall reading on their site that you can't get local content if you're out of your local area. I would check their site, though, to verify.

It went up as of July. They have made it more stable for whatever that is worth.

I think Direct TV has a streaming option but it's expensive.

FuboTV

I don't understand. This is called "Rise of Skywalker", overtly implying an ascension. I think what happens here is the Skywalkers finally bring "balance to the Force". Anakin finally fulfills the prophecy though his bloodline.

I think that baptism-by-fire is a tried-and-true method. The counterproductive part is that their confidence could take a hit, and then that needs its own rehabilitation. I also would suspect that they might learn coping strategies rather than proper productive and efficient game-processing strategies that would need to be fixed as well. There has to be some sort of computer-aided mental training they could do to augment the in-game cognitive development, alongside classroom stuff and video training (the latter of which, obviously, we know they do already).

I think Tage and Mitts both bring up an interesting part of being a NHL player that seems to get lost in the discussion of the physical game and stats and such. I think both of these guys need cognitive development - both need to "process the game" better. How do they develop these guys cognitively other than by making them play in games? Are there specialists in this area? I'm not talking about sports-psychologists, but rather people who specialize in mental training?

I'm not doubting we can move 40k cars into downtown...or "downtown". The question is where do the cars go once they get there, and where do all of the people who drive them disappear to?

First you have to define what "good" is.

I think calling this a "debate" is perhaps too generous.

Oh, I see, we want flexibility in the parameters, do we? How far out would you like the boundaries drawn? Delaware Park to the Broadway Market?

We're getting there.

I lived and worked downtown for a long time. Anyway, I did some quick maths. Your average parking spot is 8' x 18'. X 40k = 5,760,000' The boundaries for "downtown" are roughly 3150' x 6600' = 20,790,000' That means 27.7% of "downtown" needs to be reserved for parking. Probably more, actually, because of vehicles that come and go during the course of business. Can we round up to an even 30% of all space downtown is solely for parking? Sure.

We were talking about downtown.

So, I was writing a response to this when it occurred to me that we all might have varying definitions of what "downtown Buffalo" is. I'd like to submit this Google Map (IOW, not mine) definition of "downtown Buffalo". However, I completely agree with these boundaries and, in fact, have always considered this the "downtown" area.

Oh please. So your assumptions are "support"?

That's the spirit!

Should I submit?

It is if you believe 40k cars need parking spots downtown. Downtown Buffalo, that is.

You wrote words here, I don't comprehend them. It's like staring at a Rorschach blot.

This is the late summer news? Better off talking about the number of cars needing parking spots in downtown Buffalo.

You said people. Tangent: PEOPLE. Let's stare at that work for a minute and see if it makes sense after that. Even now, when I look at the word, it makes no sense. Maybe. 40k cars is a lot of cars.